Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun:106:106878.
doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2024.106878. Epub 2024 Apr 18.

Investigating the impact of ultrasound-assisted cellulase pretreatment on the nutrients, phytic acid, and phenolics bioaccessibility in sprouted brown rice

Affiliations

Investigating the impact of ultrasound-assisted cellulase pretreatment on the nutrients, phytic acid, and phenolics bioaccessibility in sprouted brown rice

Ren Li et al. Ultrason Sonochem. 2024 Jun.

Abstract

This study aimed to elucidate the impact of ultrasound-assisted cellulase (UC) pretreatment on nutrients, phytic acid, and the bioavailability of phenolics during brown rice sprouting. It sought to unveil the underlying mechanisms by quantifying the activity of key enzymes implicated in these processes. The sprouted brown rice (SBR) surface structure was harmed by the UC pretreatment, which also increased the amount of γ-oryzanol and antioxidant activity in the SBR. Concurrently, the UC pretreatment boosted the activity of phytase, glutamate decarboxylase, succinate semialdehyde dehydrogenase, Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) transaminase, chalcone isomerase, and phenylalanine ammonia lyase, thereby decreasing the phytic acid content and increasing the GABA, flavonoid, and phenolic content in SBR. In addition, UC-pretreated SBR showed increased phenolic release and bioaccessibility during in vitro digestion when compared to the treated group. These findings might offer theoretical direction for using SBR to maximize value.

Keywords: Nutrient composition; Phenolic bioaccessibility; Phytic acid; Sprouted brown rice; Ultrasound-assisted cellulase.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Microstructure of UC treated brown rice and untreated brown rice during sprouting. A-E: Microstructure of untreated brown rice at 0, 12, 24,36, 48 h during sprouting. F-J: Microstructure of UC treated brown rice at 0, 12, 24,36, 48 h during sprouting.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The GABA content and key enzyme activity in SBR with and without UC pretreatment for different sprouting hours. A: GABA, B: Glutamate decarboxylase, C: GABA transaminase, D: Succinate semialdehyde dehydrogenase. UC: SBR with UC pretreatment, CG: Control group, SBR without UC pretreatment. p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**) and p < 0.001 (***) were considered statistically significant, highly significant, and extremely significant between UC and CG at the same sprouting time, respectively. Different letters at the top of the columns indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). DW: dry basis weight.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The phytic acid and γ-oryzanol content, and phytase activity in SBR with and without UC pretreatment for different sprouting hours. A: Phytic acid, B: Phytic acid, C-G: Cycloartenyl ferulate, 24-methylenecycloartanyl ferulate, Campesterylferulate, Sitosteryl ferulate, Total γ-oryzanol. UC: SBR with UC pretreatment, CG: Control group, SBR without UC pretreatment. p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**) and p < 0.001 (***) were considered statistically significant, highly significant, and extremely significant between UC and CG at the same sprouting time, respectively. Different letters at the top of the columns indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). DW: dry basis weight.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The phenolic and flavonoid content, and key enzyme activity in SBR with and without UC pretreatment for different sprouting hours. A-C: Free, bound, and total phenolic, D: Phenylalanine ammonia lyase, E-G: Free, bound, and total flavonoid, H: Chalcone isomerase. UC: SBR with UC pretreatment, CG: Control group, SBR without UC pretreatment. p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**) and p < 0.001 (***) were considered statistically significant, highly significant, and extremely significant between UC and CG at the same sprouting time, respectively. Different letters at the top of the columns indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). DW: dry basis weight.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
The amount of release of phenolic and bioaccessibility of SBR during in vitro digestion. A: Release of phenolic in untreated SBR, B: Release of phenolic in SBR with UC pretreatment, C: Bioaccessibility of phenolic in gastric digestion, D: Bioaccessibility of phenols in intestinal digestion. UC: SBR with UC pretreatment, CG: Control group, SBR without UC pretreatment. p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**) and p < 0.001 (***) were considered statistically significant, highly significant, and extremely significant between UC and CG at the same sprouting time, respectively. Different letters at the top of the columns indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). DW: dry basis weight.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. John C.B., Stephen M.B., Piebiep G. Health-promoting germinated rice and value-added foods: a comprehensive and systematic review of germination effects on brown rice. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. 2023;63:11570–11603. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2022.2094887. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chinma C.E., Adedeji O.E., Jolayemi O.S., Ezeocha V.C., Ilowefah M.A., Rosell C.M., Adebo J.A., Wilkin J.D., Adebo O.A. Impact of germination on the techno-functional properties, nutritional composition, and health-promoting compounds of brown rice and its products: A review. J. Food Sci. 2024;89:8–32. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.16832. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Li R., Feng Y.L., Zhang H.J., Liu J., Wang J. Recent advances in fabricating, characterizing, and applying food-derived fibers using microfluidic spinning technology. Food Hydrocoll. 2023;144 doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2023.108947. - DOI
    1. Kathuria D., Hamid P., Chavan A.K., Jaiswal A., Thaku A.K., Dhiman A. Comprehensive review on sprouted seeds bioactives, the impact of novel processing techniques and health benefits. Food Rev. Int. 2024;40:370–398. doi: 10.1080/87559129.2023.2169453. - DOI
    1. Sun Y., Mehmood A., Battino M., Xiao J.B., Chen X.M. Enrichment of gamma-aminobutyric acid in foods: From conventional methods to innovative technologies. Food Rev. Int. 2022;162 doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111801. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources