Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug:163:209383.
doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209383. Epub 2024 Apr 24.

Evaluating preferences for medication formulation and treatment model among people who use opioids non-medically: A web-based cross-sectional study

Affiliations

Evaluating preferences for medication formulation and treatment model among people who use opioids non-medically: A web-based cross-sectional study

Elizabeth C Saunders et al. J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2024 Aug.

Abstract

Introduction: Over the past decade, treatment for opioid use disorder has expanded to include long-acting injectable and implantable formulations of medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD), and integrated treatment models systematically addressing both behavioral and physical health. Patient preference for these treatment options has been underexplored. Gathering data on OUD treatment preferences is critical to guide the development of patient-centered treatment for OUD. This cross-sectional study assessed preferences for long-acting MOUD and integrated treatment using an online survey.

Methods: An online Qualtrics survey assessed preferences for MOUD formulation and integrated treatment models. The study recruited participants (n = 851) in October and November 2019 through advertisements or posts on Facebook, Google AdWords, Reddit, and Amazon Mechanical Turk (mTurk). Eligible participants scored a two or higher on the opioid pain reliever or heroin scales of the Tobacco, Alcohol Prescription Medication and other Substance Use (TAPS) Tool. Structured survey items obtained patient preference for MOUD formulation and treatment model. Using stated preference methods, the study assessed preference via comparison of preferred options for MOUD and treatment model.

Results: In the past year, 824 (96.8 %) participants reported non-prescribed use of opioid pain relievers (mean TAPS score = 2.72, SD = 0.46) and 552 (64.9 %) reported heroin or fentanyl use (mean TAPS score = 2.73, SD = 0.51). Seventy-four percent of participants (n = 631) reported currently or previously receiving OUD treatment, with 407 (48.4 %) receiving MOUD. When asked about preferences for type of MOUD formulation, 452 (53.1 %) preferred a daily oral formulation, 115 (13.5 %) preferred an implant, 114 (13.4 %) preferred a monthly injection and 95 (11.2 %) preferred a weekly injection. Approximately 8.8 % (n = 75) would not consider MOUD regardless of formulation. The majority of participants (65.2 %, n = 555) preferred receiving treatment in a specialized substance use treatment program distinct from their medical care, compared with receiving care in an integrated model (n = 296, 34.8 %).

Conclusions: Though most participants expressed willingness to try long-acting MOUD formulations, the majority preferred short-acting formulations. Likewise, the majority preferred non-integrated treatment in specialty substance use settings. Reasons for these preferences provide insight on developing effective educational tools for patients and suggesting targets for intervention to develop a more acceptable treatment system.

Keywords: Integrated treatment; Medication for opioid use disorder; Patient preference; Treatment models; Web-based recruitment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest Co-author was an Editorial Assistant for the Journal of Substance Use and Addiction Treatment (formerly the Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment) from 2013 to 2015 (ECS). If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Similar articles

References

    1. Abraham AJ, Adams GB, Bradford AC, & Bradford WD (2019). County-level access to opioid use disorder medications in medicare Part D (2010-2015). Health Serv Res, 54(2), 390–398. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13113 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). (2008). Integration of mental health/substance abuse and primary care: Evidence report/techology 173. Retrieved from Washington, DC:
    1. Albayaty M, Linden M, Olsson H, Johnsson M, Strandgarden K, & Tiberg F (2017). Pharmacokinetic evaluation of once-weekly and once-monthly buprenorphine subcutaneous injection depots (CAM2038) versus intravenous and sublingual buprenorphine in healthy volunteers under naltrexone blockade: An open-label phase 1 study. Adv Ther, 34(2), 560–575. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0472-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Allen B, Nolan ML, & Paone D (2019). Underutilization of medications to treat opioid use disorder: What role does stigma play? Substance Abuse 1–7. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2019.1640833 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alsan M, Wanamaker M, & Hardeman RR (2020). The Tuskegee study of untreated syphilis: A case study in peripheral trauma with implications for health professionals. J Gen Intern Med, 35(1), 322–325. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05309-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Substances