Evaluating preferences for medication formulation and treatment model among people who use opioids non-medically: A web-based cross-sectional study
- PMID: 38670531
- PMCID: PMC11180569
- DOI: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209383
Evaluating preferences for medication formulation and treatment model among people who use opioids non-medically: A web-based cross-sectional study
Abstract
Introduction: Over the past decade, treatment for opioid use disorder has expanded to include long-acting injectable and implantable formulations of medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD), and integrated treatment models systematically addressing both behavioral and physical health. Patient preference for these treatment options has been underexplored. Gathering data on OUD treatment preferences is critical to guide the development of patient-centered treatment for OUD. This cross-sectional study assessed preferences for long-acting MOUD and integrated treatment using an online survey.
Methods: An online Qualtrics survey assessed preferences for MOUD formulation and integrated treatment models. The study recruited participants (n = 851) in October and November 2019 through advertisements or posts on Facebook, Google AdWords, Reddit, and Amazon Mechanical Turk (mTurk). Eligible participants scored a two or higher on the opioid pain reliever or heroin scales of the Tobacco, Alcohol Prescription Medication and other Substance Use (TAPS) Tool. Structured survey items obtained patient preference for MOUD formulation and treatment model. Using stated preference methods, the study assessed preference via comparison of preferred options for MOUD and treatment model.
Results: In the past year, 824 (96.8 %) participants reported non-prescribed use of opioid pain relievers (mean TAPS score = 2.72, SD = 0.46) and 552 (64.9 %) reported heroin or fentanyl use (mean TAPS score = 2.73, SD = 0.51). Seventy-four percent of participants (n = 631) reported currently or previously receiving OUD treatment, with 407 (48.4 %) receiving MOUD. When asked about preferences for type of MOUD formulation, 452 (53.1 %) preferred a daily oral formulation, 115 (13.5 %) preferred an implant, 114 (13.4 %) preferred a monthly injection and 95 (11.2 %) preferred a weekly injection. Approximately 8.8 % (n = 75) would not consider MOUD regardless of formulation. The majority of participants (65.2 %, n = 555) preferred receiving treatment in a specialized substance use treatment program distinct from their medical care, compared with receiving care in an integrated model (n = 296, 34.8 %).
Conclusions: Though most participants expressed willingness to try long-acting MOUD formulations, the majority preferred short-acting formulations. Likewise, the majority preferred non-integrated treatment in specialty substance use settings. Reasons for these preferences provide insight on developing effective educational tools for patients and suggesting targets for intervention to develop a more acceptable treatment system.
Keywords: Integrated treatment; Medication for opioid use disorder; Patient preference; Treatment models; Web-based recruitment.
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest Co-author was an Editorial Assistant for the Journal of Substance Use and Addiction Treatment (formerly the Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment) from 2013 to 2015 (ECS). If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Barriers and facilitators to use of buprenorphine in state-licensed specialty substance use treatment programs: A survey of program leadership.J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2024 Jul;162:209351. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209351. Epub 2024 Mar 17. J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2024. PMID: 38499248 Free PMC article.
-
"All I want is the best for my brother": interest in a Community Reinforcement and Family Training (CRAFT)-based group intervention among concerned significant others of individuals on office-based medications for opioid use disorder.BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 31;25(1):748. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-07132-4. BMC Psychiatry. 2025. PMID: 40745287 Free PMC article.
-
Patient and provider medication preferences affect treatment outcomes among adolescents and young adults with opioid use disorder.J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2024 Jul;162:209334. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209334. Epub 2024 Mar 24. J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2024. PMID: 38531508 Free PMC article.
-
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3. Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 39593159 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of methamphetamine/amphetamine use on receipt and outcomes of medications for opioid use disorder: a systematic review.Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2021 Oct 11;16(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s13722-021-00266-2. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2021. PMID: 34635170 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). (2008). Integration of mental health/substance abuse and primary care: Evidence report/techology 173. Retrieved from Washington, DC:
-
- Albayaty M, Linden M, Olsson H, Johnsson M, Strandgarden K, & Tiberg F (2017). Pharmacokinetic evaluation of once-weekly and once-monthly buprenorphine subcutaneous injection depots (CAM2038) versus intravenous and sublingual buprenorphine in healthy volunteers under naltrexone blockade: An open-label phase 1 study. Adv Ther, 34(2), 560–575. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0472-9 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous