Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 26;15(1):3552.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-47799-z.

CAR affinity modulates the sensitivity of CAR-T cells to PD-1/PD-L1-mediated inhibition

Affiliations

CAR affinity modulates the sensitivity of CAR-T cells to PD-1/PD-L1-mediated inhibition

Irene Andreu-Saumell et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy for solid tumors faces significant hurdles, including T-cell inhibition mediated by the PD-1/PD-L1 axis. The effects of disrupting this pathway on T-cells are being actively explored and controversial outcomes have been reported. Here, we hypothesize that CAR-antigen affinity may be a key factor modulating T-cell susceptibility towards the PD-1/PD-L1 axis. We systematically interrogate CAR-T cells targeting HER2 with either low (LA) or high affinity (HA) in various preclinical models. Our results reveal an increased sensitivity of LA CAR-T cells to PD-L1-mediated inhibition when compared to their HA counterparts by using in vitro models of tumor cell lines and supported lipid bilayers modified to display varying PD-L1 densities. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout (KO) of PD-1 enhances LA CAR-T cell cytokine secretion and polyfunctionality in vitro and antitumor effect in vivo and results in the downregulation of gene signatures related to T-cell exhaustion. By contrast, HA CAR-T cell features remain unaffected following PD-1 KO. This behavior holds true for CD28 and ICOS but not 4-1BB co-stimulated CAR-T cells, which are less sensitive to PD-L1 inhibition albeit targeting the antigen with LA. Our findings may inform CAR-T therapies involving disruption of PD-1/PD-L1 pathway tailored in particular for effective treatment of solid tumors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

S.G. is an inventor on patents related to CAR-T cell therapy, filed by the University of Pennsylvania and licensed to Novartis and Tmunity, and has received commercial research funding from Gilead. A.R-G. is an inventor on patents related to CAR-T cell therapy, filed by the University of Pennsylvania. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. PD-1 KO restores LA HER2-28Z CAR-T cell function in vitro but does not affect HA HER2-28Z CAR-Ts.
a Expression and quantification of PD-L1 molecules in SKOV3 cells expressing variable PD-L1 densities and compared to wild type (WT) cells alone or co-cultured with CAR-T cells for 48 h as assessed by flow cytometry. b Immunohistochemical staining of PD-L1 in SKOV3 PD-L1 KO, Low, High, and WT tumors treated with control T-cells or CAR-T cells at day 20–70 post-implantation in mice. Representative images from n = 2 tumors per group are shown. Scale bar, 200 µm. c Schematic overview of CAR constructs used with their corresponding affinity values. HER2-28Z CAR-T cells with LA or HA and with or without PD-1 genome editing were generated from 9 to 13 healthy donors. CAR (d) and PD-1 (e) expression were quantified by flow cytometry and the efficiency of PD-1 knock-out (f) was quantified by using ICE tool (Synthego). LA (g, i) or HA (h, j) HER2-28Z CAR-T cells were co-cultured with indicated SKOV3 cells for 24 h. The PD-1/PD-L1 axis was inhibited by knocking out PD-1 (g, h) or by addition of blocking antibodies (i, j). IFN-γ production was analyzed by ELISA (n = 3–5). Data is represented as absolute levels (left panel) or as fold change versus mock (right panel). k LA (left panel) or HA (right panel) FRβ−28Z CAR-T cells were co-cultured with SKOV3 expressing FRβ and indicated PD-L1 densities. IFN-γ production was quantified by ELISA (n = 4). l T-cell proliferation of LA (left panel) or HA (right panel) HER2-28Z CAR-T cells following co-culture with HCC1954. Fold change of absolute T-cell numbers at day 6 versus day 0 is represented (n = 4). Data in (dl) are pooled from independent experiments where each dot represents CAR-T cells generated from a different donor (n) and represented as mean ± SD (in df) or mean ± SEM (in gl). p values by a two-tailed paired T test (e, g, h for absolute levels graphs, k, l), one-way ANOVA (g, h for fold change graphs) or two-tailed one sample T test (i) are indicated. Source data and exact n values for each group in (dj) are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. PD-1 KO restores LA HER2-28Z CAR-T cell function in vivo but does not affect HA HER2-28Z CAR T-cells.
a Tumor measurements of NSG mice bearing SKOV3 tumors expressing indicated PD-L1 densities and treated with 3–4 × 106 control T-cells, mock or PD-1 KO LA HER2-28Z CAR+-T cells (n = 8 for SKOV3 PD-L1 KO and PD-L1 High; n = 8, 13 or 12 for control, mock and PD-1 KO groups, respectively, for SKOV3 PD-L1 Low). b, c NSG mice bearing SKOV3 PD-L1 High tumors were treated with 3 × 106 control T-cells (n = 5), mock (n = 7), mock + anti PD-L1 antibody (n = 7) or PD-1 KO (n = 8) LA HER2-28Z CAR+-T cells. b Tumor measurements and (c) percentage of tumor growth indicated as the change in tumor volume on day 20 versus baseline is shown. d Tumor measurements of NSG mice bearing SKOV3 tumors expressing indicated PD-L1 densities and treated with 3–4 × 106 control T-cells, mock or PD-1 KO HA HER2-28Z CAR+-T cells (n = 8, 13 and 12 for control, mock and PD-1 KO groups, respectively, for SKOV3 PD-L1 KO; n = 8 for SKOV3 PD-L1 High). Tumor measurements of NSG mice bearing SKOV3 wild type tumors treated with 3 × 106 control T-cells, mock or PD-1 KO HER2−28Z CAR+-T cells of (e) LA (n = 8 for control and n = 10 for mock and PD-1 KO groups) or (f) HA (n = 8 for all groups). g Tumor measurements of NSG mice bearing HCC1954 tumors treated with 3 × 106 control T-cells (n = 9), mock (n = 10) or PD-1-KO (n = 10) LA HER2-28Z CAR+-T cells. Data in (a, b) and (dg) are represented as mean tumor volume ±SEM and n indicates tumors per group. p values by (c) one-way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc test or (a, b, dg) two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple testing correction are indicated. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. HA HER2-28Z CAR-T cells are more resistant to inhibition by increasing amounts of PD-L1 in a protein-functionalized planar glass SLB system.
a Schematic representation of an SLB featuring fluorescently labeled proteins (HER2 and PD-L1) and ICAM-1. Created with Biorender.com. b IFN-γ production by HER2-28Z mock and PD-1-KO LA (left panel) or HA (right panel) CAR-T cells after 24 h of co-culture with SLBs containing increasing concentrations of PD-L1. HER2-28Z mock and PD-1-KO (c) LA or (d) HA CAR-T cells were co-cultured for 24 h with SLBs containing either HER2 alone (2 ng) or HER2 along with PD-L1 (200 ng). IFN-γ secretion as measured by ELISA is represented as absolute levels (left panel) or fold change of the HER2 + PD-L1 condition compared to HER2 alone (right panel). Data in (b) is representative of two different donors and in (c, d) is shown as mean of two different donors (n = 2). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Differential transcriptomic response of HA and LA HER2-28Z CAR-T cells to PD-1 KO.
Transcriptomic analysis of mock and PD-1 KO LA or HA HER2-28Z CAR-T cells was performed after stimulation with SKOV3 WT tumor cells for 48 h. a Volcano plots of differential expression between mock and PD-1 KO in LA (left panel) or HA (right panel) HER2-28Z CAR-T cells. Red dots represent genes upregulated in PD-1 KO vs mock, blue dots represent genes downregulated genes in PD-1 KO vs mock and black dots represent genes not differentially expressed. Differentially expressed genes are annotated. The horizontal line is at an adjusted p value of 0.05. b Heat map of differential expression between mock and PD-1 KO in LA (left panel) or HA (right panel) HER2−28Z CAR-T cells. c Gene Ontology (GO) Biological process of differentially expressed genes between PD-1 KO and mock LA HER2-28Z CAR-T cells. Data in (ac) is represented as mean of n = 3 donors. In (a, b) p value thresholds (p < 0.05) were derived from Rosalind and adjusted using the Benjamini–Hochberg method. In (c) p value thresholds (p < 0.05) were derived from Enrichr by a Fisher exact test and adjusted using the Benjamini–Hochberg method. All tests were two-sided. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Polyfunctional profiling of PD-1 KO LA and HA HER2-28Z CAR-T cells.
Single-Cell Adaptive Immune panel (Isoplexis) of mock and PD-1 KO LA and HA HER2-28Z CAR-T cells after co-culture with SKOV3 tumor cells for 24 h (E:T = 1:3). Three-dimensional t-SNE plots of (a) LA and (b) HA mock (blue) and PD-1 KO (orange) HER2-28Z CAR-T cells by differentiating them based on their cytokine functional differences. Frequencies of polyfunctional cells of mock and PD-1 KO (c) LA and (d) HA HER2-28Z CAR-T cells. Polyfunctionality Strength Index (PSI) of mock and PD-1 KO (e) LA and (f) HA HER2-28Z CAR-T cells. Fold-change values for PD-1 KO versus mock are indicated. g Representative flow cytometry plots of intracellular cytokine staining for TNF-α and IFN-γ in mock and PD-1 KO LA and HA HER2−28Z CAR-T cells after co-culture with SKOV3 tumor cells for 24 hours (E:T = 1:3) (gated on live/CD45+). h Frequencies of IFN-γ+TNF-α+ T-cells represented as absolute numbers and fold change of PD-1 KO versus mock are shown. In (af), data is shown as mean from n = 2 donors. In (h), data is pooled from four independent experiments where each dot represents CAR-T cells generated from a different donor (n = 5), and is represented as mean ± SEM. p values by a two-tailed paired T test for absolute numbers or by two-tailed one-sample T test for fold-change graphs are indicated. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. HA HER2-28Z CAR-T cells demonstrate reactivity against a panel of primary healthy cells while LA CAR-T cells do not.
Mock or PD-1 KO HER2-28Z CAR-T cells of LA or HA were co-cultured with a panel of human primary cells. a, b CD107-α degranulation marker was measured after 6 h of co-culture (E:T = 1:1). a Representative flow cytometry plots and (b) percentage of cells producing CD107-α (gated on live/CD45+) are shown. c IFN-γ production by HER2-28Z CAR-T cells after 24 h of co-culture (E:T = 3:1) as quantified by ELISA. Data in (b, c) are plotted as mean ± SEM (n = 3 donors). p values by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple testing correction are indicated. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7. Role of target antigen and CAR expression in determining sensitivity to PD-L1.
IFN-γ production by mock or PD-1-KO (a) LA or (b) HA HER2-28Z CAR-T cells after 72 h of co-culture with SLBs containing either HER2 alone (50 ng) or increasing concentrations of HER2 along with PD-L1 (200 ng) as measured by ELISA. Data from one donor is represented as absolute levels (left panel) or fold change of IFN-γ by PD-1 KO versus mock HER2-28Z CAR-T cells (right panel). IFN-γ production by mock or PD-1-KO LA (left panel) or HA (right panel) HER2-28Z CAR-T cells after 24 h of co-culture with (c) MDA-MB-468 PD-L1 high HER2 high or (d) MDA-MB-468 PD-L1 high HER2 low (E:T = 3:1) as measured by ELISA. e Representative flow cytometry plots and frequencies of IFN-γ+TNF-α+ T-cells (gated on live/CD45+) of intracellular cytokine staining for TNF-α and IFN-γ in mock and PD-1 KO LA and HA HER2-28Z CAR-T cells after co-culture with MDA-MB-468 PD-L1 high HER2 high (f) or MDA-MB-468 PD-L1 high HER2 low (g) tumor cells for 24 h (E:T = 1:3). h Schematic representation of criteria to discriminate between Low CAR and High CAR-T cell products. Created with Adobe Illustrator. IFN-γ production by mock or PD-1-KO (i) LA or (j) HA HER2-28Z CAR-T cells with either Low (n = 7 donors for LA and n = 4 for HA) or High (n = 3 donors) CAR frequencies after 24 h of co-culture with SKOV3 PD-L1 High tumor cells (E:T = 3:1). Data in (c, d, f, g) is represented as mean ± SEM (n = 3 donors) and p values by a two-tailed paired T-test are indicated. Data in (i) and (j) is pooled from nine and five independent experiments, respectively, where each dot represents CAR-T cells generated from different donors (n) and represented as mean ± SEM for absolute levels (left panel) and fold change of PD-1 KO versus mock (right panel). p values by a two-tailed paired T test (for absolute levels) or a two-tailed one-sample T-test (for fold change) are indicated. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8. Influence of scFv and co-stimulatory domains in PD-1/PD-L1-mediated inhibition of CAR-T cells.
a Schematic overview of CAR constructs used with their corresponding affinity values. b Tumor measurements of NSG mice bearing SKOV3 tumors treated with 5 × 106 control T-cells, mock or PD-1 KO LA HER2-ICOSZ CAR+-T cells (n = 10, left panel) or with 3 × 106 control T-cells, mock or PD-1 KO HA HER2-ICOSZ CAR+-T cells (n = 7 for control and n = 8 for mock and PD-1 KO, right panel). c Quantification of IFN-γ and IL-2 production by PD-1 KO or mock LA HER2-BBZ CAR-T cells, alone or in combination with anti PD-1 or anti PD-L1 antibodies, after 24 h of co-culture with SKOV3 tumor cells (E:T = 3:1) as measured by ELISA (n = 3 for all groups except for mock+anti PD-L1 with n = 1). d Tumor measurements of NSG mice bearing SKOV3 tumors treated with 3 × 106 control-T cells (n = 8), mock (n = 8) or PD-1 KO (n = 10) LA HER2-BBZ CAR+-T cells. e Quantification of IFN-γ and IL-2 production by PD-1 KO or mock Meso−28Z CAR-T cells, alone or in combination with anti PD-1 or anti PD-L1 antibodies, after 24 h of co-culture with CAPAN2 tumor cells (E:T = 3:1) as measured by ELISA (n = 3). f Tumor measurements of NSG mice bearing CAPAN2 tumors and treated with 2 × 106 control T cells, mock or PD-1 KO Meso-28Z CAR+-T cells (n = 12). Data in (b, d, f) are represented as mean tumor volume ± SEM and n indicates tumors per group. Data in (c, e) are represented as mean ± SEM of absolute levels (left panel) or fold change of indicated groups as compared to mock CAR-T cells (right panel). Data is pooled from independent experiments where each dot indicates a different donor for CAR-T generation (n). p values by two-way ANOVA with Sidak multiple testing correction (b), two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple testing correction (f), one-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test (e, absolute levels) or one-sample T-test (e, fold change) are indicated. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

References

    1. June CH, Sadelain M. Chimeric antigen receptor therapy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018;379:64–73. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1706169. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Del Bufalo F, et al. GD2-CART01 for relapsed or refractory high-risk neuroblastoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2023;388:1284–1295. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2210859. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Majzner RG, et al. GD2-CAR T cell therapy for H3K27M-mutated diffuse midline gliomas. Nature. 2022;603:934–941. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04489-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Qi C, et al. Claudin18.2-specific CAR T cells in gastrointestinal cancers: phase 1 trial interim results. Nat. Med. 2022;28:1189–1198. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01800-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rodriguez-Garcia A, et al. CAR-T cells hit the tumor microenvironment: strategies to overcome tumor escape. Front. Immunol. 2020;11:1109. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01109. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms