Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 1;11(4):418.
doi: 10.3390/children11040418.

Preformed Elastodontic Appliances: Awareness and Attitude of Orthodontists and General Dental Practitioners

Davide Cannatà  1 , Marzio Galdi  1 , Stefano Martina  1 , Roberto Rongo  2 , Vincenzo D'Antò  2 , Rosa Valletta  2 , Rosaria Bucci  2
Affiliations

Preformed Elastodontic Appliances: Awareness and Attitude of Orthodontists and General Dental Practitioners

Davide Cannatà et al. Children (Basel). .

Abstract

Background: Preformed elastodontic appliances (EAs) have been described as safe, cost-effective, and easy-to-use devices for interceptive orthodontic treatment in growing patients. This study aimed to assess the knowledge and the attitude of dentists toward the use of EAs and to compare the behaviors of orthodontists (Os) with those of general dental practitioners (GDPs).

Methods: An anonymous survey was distributed among dentists through social media. Twenty-two items were divided as follows: characteristics of respondents; general knowledge about EAs; section for EA-users; and section for EA non-users. Chi-squared tests were used to analyze differences in responses between groups.

Results: Participants included 226 Os and 168 GDPs. The majority in both groups reported having adequate knowledge about EAs and utilizing them in their practice. GDPs usually use EAs to treat children during the early phase of growth, while Os also use EAs to address orthodontic problems in different stages of dentition, experiencing a chair time reduction compared with traditional appliances. Regarding EA non-users, GDPs seem not to find an application among their patients, whereas Os reported not having enough patient compliance during treatment.

Conclusions: Although treatment with EAs is common among all dentists, differences exist between Os and GDPs in the awareness and application, as well as in the reasons provided for not using EAs.

Keywords: elastodontic appliances; general dental practitioners; growing patients; interceptive dentistry; myofunctional appliances; orthodontics; pediatric dentistry.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison between Os and GDPs in terms of the reason for not utilizing EAs.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mostafiz W. Fundamentals of Interceptive Orthodontics: Optimizing Dentofacial Growth and Development. Compend. Contin. Educ. Dent. 2019;40:149–154. quiz 155. - PubMed
    1. Arvystas M.G. The Rationale for Early Orthodontic Treatment. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 1998;113:15–18. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70271-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wong M.L., Awang C.F., Ng L.K., Norlian D., Burhanudin R.D., Gere M.J. Role of Interceptive Orthodontics in Early Mixed Dentition. Singap. Dent. J. 2004;26:10–14. - PubMed
    1. Wishney M., Darendeliler M.A., Dalci O. Myofunctional Therapy and Prefabricated Functional Appliances: An Overview of the History and Evidence. Aust. Dent. J. 2019;64:135–144. doi: 10.1111/adj.12690. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ronsivalle V., Quinzi V., La Rosa S., Leonardi R., Lo Giudice A. Comparative Analysis of Skeletal Changes, Occlusal Changes, and Palatal Morphology in Children with Mild Class III Malocclusion Treated with Elastodontic Appliances and Bimaxillary Plates. Children. 2023;10:1219. doi: 10.3390/children10071219. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources