Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 15;12(4):866.
doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12040866.

Possible Causal Association between Type 2 Diabetes and Glycaemic Traits in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomisation Study

Affiliations

Possible Causal Association between Type 2 Diabetes and Glycaemic Traits in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomisation Study

Je Hyun Seo et al. Biomedicines. .

Abstract

Existing literature suggests a controversial relationship between type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) and glaucoma. This study aimed to examine the potential causal connection between T2D and glycaemic traits (fasting glucose [FG] and glycated haemoglobin [HbA1c] levels) as exposures to primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) in multi-ethnic populations. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with exposure to T2D, FG, and HbA1c were selected as instrumental variables with significance (p < 5.0 × 10-8) from the genome-wide association study (GWAS)-based meta-analysis data available from the BioBank Japan and the UK Biobank (UKB). The GWAS for POAG was obtained from the meta-analyses of Genetic Epidemiology Research in Adult Health and Aging and the UKB. A two-sample Mendelian randomisation (MR) study was performed to assess the causal estimates using the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method, and MR-Pleiotropy Residual Sum and Outlier test (MR-PRESSO). Significant causal associations of T2D (odds ratio [OR] = 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [1.00-1.10], p = 0.031 in IVW; OR = 1.06, 95% CI = [1.01-1.11], p = 0.017 in MR-PRESSO) and FG levels (OR = 1.19, 95% CI = [1.02-1.38], p = 0.026 in IVW; OR = 1.17, 95% CI = [1.01-1.35], p = 0.041 in MR-PRESSO) with POAG were observed, but not in HbA1c (all p > 0.05). The potential causal relationship between T2D or FG and POAG highlights its role in the prevention of POAG. Further investigation is necessary to authenticate these findings.

Keywords: fasting glucose; mendelian randomisation; primary open-angle glaucoma; single-nucleotide polymorphisms; type 2 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Diagram of two-sample Mendelian randomisation analysis. Abbreviation: HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin; SNP, Single nucleotide polymorphism.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot of causal associations of T2D on glaucoma. Abbreviations: T2D, type 2 diabetes; IVW, inverse-variance weighted; SIMEX, Simulation Extrapolation; MR–PRESSO, MR- pleiotropy residual sum and outlier test; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Scatter plots of MR tests assessing the effect of T2D on glaucoma. Abbreviations: T2D, type 2 diabetes; IVW, inverse-variance weighted; SIMEX, Simulation Extrapolation; MR, Mendelian randomisation. Light blue, light green, dark blue, and dark green regression lines represent the IVW, MR–Egger (SIMEX), MR–Egger, and weighted median estimate, respectively.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plot of causal associations of FG and HbA1c on glaucoma. Abbreviations: FG, fasting glucose; IVW, inverse-variance weighted; SIMEX, Simulation Extrapolation; MR–PRESSO, MR-pleiotropy residual sum and outlier test; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval, HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Scatter plots of MR tests assessing the effect of FG and HbA1c on glaucoma. Abbreviations: FG, fasting glucose; IVW, inverse-variance weighted; SIMEX, Simulation Extrapolation; HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin; MR, Mendelian randomisation. Light blue, light green, dark blue, and dark green regression lines represent the IVW, MR–Egger (SIMEX), MR–Egger, and weighted median estimate, respectively.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Quigley H.A. Glaucoma. Lancet. 2011;377:1367–1377. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61423-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tham Y.C., Li X., Wong T.Y., Quigley H.A., Aung T., Cheng C.Y. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2014;121:2081–2090. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jonas J.B., Aung T., Bourne R.R., Bron A.M., Ritch R., Panda-Jonas S. Glaucoma. Lancet. 2017;390:2183–2193. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31469-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bonomi L., Marchini G., Marraffa M., Bernardi P., Morbio R., Varotto A. Vascular risk factors for primary open angle glaucoma: The Egna-Neumarkt Study. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:1287–1293. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(00)00138-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yanagi M., Kawasaki R., Wang J.J., Wong T.Y., Crowston J., Kiuchi Y. Vascular risk factors in glaucoma: A review. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2011;39:252–258. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2010.02455.x. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources