Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Mar 29;14(4):365.
doi: 10.3390/jpm14040365.

Damage Control Interventional Radiology in Liver Trauma: A Comprehensive Review

Affiliations
Review

Damage Control Interventional Radiology in Liver Trauma: A Comprehensive Review

Fabio Corvino et al. J Pers Med. .

Abstract

The liver is the second most common solid organ injured in blunt and penetrating abdominal trauma. Non-operative management (NOM) has become the standard of care for liver injuries in stable patients, where transarterial embolization (TAE) represents the main treatment, increasing success rates and avoiding invasive surgical procedures. In hemodynamically (HD) unstable patients, operative management (OM) is the standard of care. To date, there are no consensus guidelines about the endovascular treatment of patients with HD instability or in ones that responded to initial infusion therapy. A review of the literature was performed for published papers addressing the outcome of using TAE as the primary treatment for HD unstable/transient responder trauma liver patients with hemorrhagic vascular lesions, both as a single treatment and in combination with surgical treatment, focusing additionally on the different definitions used in the literature of unstable and transient responder patients. Our review demonstrated a good outcome in HD unstable/transient responder liver trauma patients treated with TAE but there still remains much debate about the definition of unstable and transient responder patients.

Keywords: damage control interventional radiology; hemodynamic instability; liver trauma; transarterial embolization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram for systematic research and selection of studies included in the review.

References

    1. Loggers S.A.I., Koedam T.W.A., Giannakopoulos G.F., Vandewalle E., Erwteman M., Zuidema W.P. Definition of hemodynamic stability in blunt trauma patients: A systematic review and assessment amongst Dutch trauma team members. Eur. J. Trauma Emerg. Surg. 2017;43:823–833. doi: 10.1007/s00068-016-0744-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Matsushima K., Piccinini A., Schellenberg M., Cheng V., Heindel P., Strumwasser A., Benjamin E., Inaba K., Demetriades D. Effect of door-to-angioembolization time on mortality in pelvic fracture: Every hour of delay counts. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018;84:685–692. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001803. - DOI - PubMed
    1. American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma Resources for Optimal Care of the Injured Patient. 2022. [(accessed on 2 November 2022)]. Available online: https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/trauma/quality/verification-review...
    1. Mathew J.K., Fitzgerald M.C. Damage Control Interventional Radiology (DCIR): Evolving Value of Interventional Radiology in Trauma. Cardiovasc. Interv. Radiol. 2022;45:1757–1758. doi: 10.1007/s00270-022-03241-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Clements W., Koukounaras J., Joseph T. Reply to “Damage Control Interventional Radiology (DCIR): Evolving Value of In-terventional Radiology in Trauma”. Cardiovasc. Interv. Radiol. 2022;45:1759–1761. doi: 10.1007/s00270-022-03275-z. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources