Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 16;13(8):2295.
doi: 10.3390/jcm13082295.

Validation of the Novel Web-Based Application HUMTELEMED for a Comprehensive Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk Based on the 2021 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines

Affiliations

Validation of the Novel Web-Based Application HUMTELEMED for a Comprehensive Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk Based on the 2021 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines

Matteo Landolfo et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Background and aims: SCORE2/SCORE2-OP cardiovascular risk (CVR) charts and online calculators do not apply to patients with comorbidities, target organ damage, or atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, for whom the assessment relies on the conventional consultation of the 2021 ESC guidelines (qualitative approach). To simplify the CVR evaluation, we developed an integrated multi-language and free-to-use web application. This study assessed the agreement between the conventional method versus our web app. Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out on 1306 consecutive patients aged 40+ years referred to our center for the diagnosis and management of hypertension and dyslipidemia. Two double-blind operators performed the CVR assessment and classified each patient into low-moderate-, high-, and very-high-risk categories by using the conventional method (SCORE2/SCORE2-OP charts and consultation of the 2021 ESC guidelines) and the web app. The Kappa statistics were used to compare the two methods. Results: The mean age was 60.3 ± 11.9 years, with male prevalence (51.4%). Patients in primary prevention were 77.0%. According to the SCORE2/SCORE2-OP charts and 2021 ESC guideline consultation, the CVR was low-moderate in 18.6% (n° 243), high in 36.8% (n° 480), and very high in 44.6% (n° 583). According to the web app, individual CVR was low-moderate in 19.5% (n° 255), high in 35.4% (n° 462), and very high in 45.1% (n° 589). The two methods strongly agreed (Kappa = 0.960, p < 0.001), with a 97.5% concordance. Conclusions: our application has excellent reliability in a broad "real life" population and may help non-expert users and busy clinicians to assess individual CVR appropriately, representing a free-to-use, simple, time-sparing and widely available alternative to the conventional CVR evaluation using SCORE2/SCORE2-OP and 2021 ESC guideline charts.

Keywords: SCORE2; SCORE2-OP; cardiovascular risk; dyslipidemia; humtelemed; hypertension.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. SCORE2 Working Group. ESC Cardiovascular Risk Collaboration SCORE2 risk prediction algorithms: New models to estimate 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease in Europe. Eur. Heart J. 2021;42:2439–2454. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab309. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. SCORE2-OP Working Group. ESC Cardiovascular Risk Collaboration SCORE2-OP risk prediction algorithms: Estimating incident cardiovascular event risk in older persons in four geographical risk regions. Eur. Heart J. 2021;42:2455–2467. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab312. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Visseren F.L.J., Mach F., Smulders Y.M., Carballo D., Koskinas K.C., Bäck M., Benetos A., Biffi A., Boavida J.-M., Capodanno D., et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur. Heart J. 2021;42:3227–3337. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab484. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Martins J., Steyn N., Rossouw H.M., Pillay T.S. Best practice for LDL-cholesterol: When and how to calculate. J. Clin. Pathol. 2023;76:145–152. doi: 10.1136/jcp-2022-208480. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Spannella F., Giulietti F., Fedecostante M., Ricci M., Balietti P., Cocci G., Landi L., Bonfigli A.R., Boemi M., Espinosa E., et al. Interarm blood pressure differences predict target organ damage in type 2 diabetes. J. Clin. Hypertens. 2017;19:472–478. doi: 10.1111/jch.12963. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources