Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Apr 9;16(8):1104.
doi: 10.3390/nu16081104.

Nutrition for European Elite Fencers: A Practical Tool for Coaches and Athletes

Affiliations
Review

Nutrition for European Elite Fencers: A Practical Tool for Coaches and Athletes

Marta Lomazzi. Nutrients. .

Abstract

The aim of this narrative review is to create a comprehensive, innovative, and pragmatic resource to guide elite fencers and coaches in making strategic nutritional choices to enhance performance and facilitate recovery. The literature review identified only 12 articles specifically addressing the topic of nutrition for fencers. Thus, the recommendations provided in this review derive also from articles dealing with similar sports, such as martial arts, and from investigations with European elite fencers and their coaches. For elite fencers, it is suggested to consume daily 7-11 g/kg of body weight (BW) of carbohydrates and 1.5-2 g/kg of BW of proteins and allocate 25% to 30% of the total energy intake to essential fats, with a specific focus on omega-3 fatty acids. The timing of meals, ideally within one hour after exertion, plays a pivotal role in restoring glycogen reserves and preventing injuries. The intake of leucine, creatine, omega-3, collagen, and vitamins C and D is proposed as a strategy for injury recovery. It is worth acknowledging that even when personalized plans are provided, implementation can be challenging, especially during competitions and training camps.

Keywords: fencing; injury recovery; performance; sports’ nutrition; supplements.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Turner A., James N., Dimitriou L., Greenhalgh A., Moody J., Fulcher D., Mias E., Kilduff L. Determinants of olympic fencing performance and implications for strength and conditioning training. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2014;28:3001–3011. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000478. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Milia R., Roberto S., Pinna M., Palazzolo G., Sanna I., Omeri M., Piredda S., Migliaccio G., Concu A., Crisafulli A. Physiological responses and energy expenditure during competitive fencing. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 2014;39:324–328. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2013-0221. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Roi G.S., Bianchedi D. The science of fencing: Implications for performance and injury prevention. Sports Med. 2008;38:465–481. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200838060-00003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. EFC-CEE Competition EU. 2023. [(accessed on 12 September 2023)]. Available online: https://www.eurofencing.info/competitions/championships.
    1. FIE Competitions International. 2023. [(accessed on 12 September 2023)]. Available online: https://fie.org/competitions.

LinkOut - more resources