Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Apr 11;16(8):1063.
doi: 10.3390/polym16081063.

Biopolymeric Nanocomposites for CO2 Capture

Affiliations
Review

Biopolymeric Nanocomposites for CO2 Capture

Rosalia Maria Cigala et al. Polymers (Basel). .

Abstract

Carbon dioxide (CO2) impacts the greenhouse effect significantly and results in global warming, prompting urgent attention to climate change concerns. In response, CO2 capture has emerged as a crucial process to capture carbon produced in industrial and power processes before its release into the atmosphere. The main aim of CO2 capture is to mitigate the emissions of greenhouse gas and reduce the anthropogenic impact on climate change. Biopolymer nanocomposites offer a promising avenue for CO2 capture due to their renewable nature. These composites consist of biopolymers derived from biological sources and nanofillers like nanoparticles and nanotubes, enhancing the properties of the composite. Various biopolymers like chitosan, cellulose, carrageenan, and others, possessing unique functional groups, can interact with CO2 molecules. Nanofillers are incorporated to improve mechanical, thermal, and sorption properties, with materials such as graphene, carbon nanotubes, and metallic nanoparticles enhancing surface area and porosity. The CO2 capture mechanism within biopolymer nanocomposites involves physical absorption, chemisorption, and physisorption, driven by functional groups like amino and hydroxyl groups in the biopolymer matrix. The integration of nanofillers further boosts CO2 adsorption capacity by increasing surface area and porosity. Numerous advanced materials, including biopolymeric derivatives like cellulose, alginate, and chitosan, are developed for CO2 capture technology, offering accessibility and cost-effectiveness. This semi-systematic literature review focuses on recent studies involving biopolymer-based materials for CO2 capture, providing an overview of composite materials enriched with nanomaterials, specifically based on cellulose, alginate, chitosan, and carrageenan; the choice of these biopolymers is dictated by the lack of a literature perspective focused on a currently relevant topic such as these biorenewable resources in the framework of carbon capture. The production and efficacy of biopolymer-based adsorbents and membranes are examined, shedding light on potential trends in global CO2 capture technology enhancement.

Keywords: CO2 capture; adsorption capacity; biopolymer; carbon dioxide; nanocomposite materials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic illustration of CO2 capture and conversion methodology and utilization [11].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Advanced materials for CO2 capture post-combustion methods.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Gas adsorption on microporous biopolymer.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Flowchart of the cellulose synthesis process [49].
Figure 5
Figure 5
Schematic reaction between amine groups and CO2 and the influence of humidity content.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Flowchart of sodium alginate synthesis via two typical processes: calcium salt precipitation (blue boxes) or acidification (orange boxes).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Flow diagram of chitosan synthesis and possible hydrolysis in the corresponding oligomers or monomers [93].
Figure 8
Figure 8
Immobilization techniques: (a) adsorption, (b) surface covalent bonding, (c) encapsulation within a polymer, and (d) cross-linking.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Flowchart for the extraction of gel and refined carrageenan from seaweeds [110].

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Raza S., Orooji Y., Ghasali E., Hayat A., Karimi-Maleh H., Lin H. Engineering Approaches for CO2 Converting to Biomass Coupled with Nanobiomaterials as Biomediated towards Circular Bioeconomy. J. CO2 Util. 2023;67:102295. doi: 10.1016/j.jcou.2022.102295. - DOI
    1. Ghanbari T., Abnisa F., Wan Daud W.M.A. A Review on Production of Metal Organic Frameworks (MOF) for CO2 Adsorption. Sci. Total Environ. 2020;707:135090. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135090. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cheung O., Hedin N. Zeolites and Related Sorbents with Narrow Pores for CO2 Separation from Flue Gas. RSC Adv. 2014;4:14480–14494. doi: 10.1039/C3RA48052F. - DOI
    1. Villari V., Mazzaglia A., Trapani M., Castriciano M.A., de Luca G., Romeo A., Scolaro L.M., Micali N. Optical Enhancement and Structural Properties of a Hybrid Organic−Inorganic Ternary Nanocomposite. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2011;115:5435–5439. doi: 10.1021/jp110966h. - DOI
    1. Li Y., Jia P., Xu J., Wu Y., Jiang H., Li Z. The Aminosilane Functionalization of Cellulose Nanofibrils and the Mechanical and CO2 Adsorption Characteristics of Their Aerogel. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2020;59:2874–2882. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b04253. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources