Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 18;16(8):1139.
doi: 10.3390/polym16081139.

Highly Efficient and Eco-Friendly Thermal-Neutron-Shielding Materials Based on Recycled High-Density Polyethylene and Gadolinium Oxide Composites

Affiliations

Highly Efficient and Eco-Friendly Thermal-Neutron-Shielding Materials Based on Recycled High-Density Polyethylene and Gadolinium Oxide Composites

Donruedee Toyen et al. Polymers (Basel). .

Abstract

Due to the increasing demands for improved radiation safety and the growing concerns regarding the excessive use of plastics, this work aimed to develop effective and eco-friendly thermal-neutron-shielding materials based on recycled high-density polyethylene (r-HDPE) composites containing varying surface-treated gadolinium oxide (Gd2O3) contents (0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 wt%). The results indicate that the overall thermal-neutron-shielding properties of the r-HDPE composites were enhanced with the addition of Gd2O3, as evidenced by large reductions in I/I0, HVL, and TVL, as well as the substantial increases in ∑t and ∑t/ρ of the composites. Furthermore, the results reveal that the values for tensile properties initially increased up to 5-15 wt% of Gd2O3 and then gradually decreased at higher contents. In addition, the results show that the addition of Gd2O3 particles generally increased the density (ρ), the remaining ash at 600 °C, and the degree of crystallinity (%XC) of the composites. This work also determined the effects of gamma irradiation on relevant properties of the composites. The findings indicate that following gamma aging, the tensile modulus slightly increased, while the tensile strength, elongation at break, and hardness (Shore D) showed no significant (p < 0.05) differences, except for the sample containing 5 wt% of Gd2O3, which exhibited a noticeable reduction in elongation at break. Furthermore, by comparing the neutron-shielding and mechanical properties of the developed r-HDPE composites with common borated polyethylene (PE) containing 5 wt% and 15 wt% of boron, the results clearly indicate the superior shielding and tensile properties in the r-HDPE composites, implying the great potential of r-HDPE composites to replace virgin plastics as effective and more eco-friendly shielding materials.

Keywords: attenuation; gamma aging; mechanical properties; neutrons; rare-earth oxide; recycled materials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could appear to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Optical and (b) micrograph images of Gd2O3 particles and (c) distribution of Gd2O3 particle sizes.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Scope of work showing (a) Part I, optimization procedure for surface treatment of Gd2O3 particles using silane coupling agent (KBE903), and (b) Part II, preparation and investigation of properties for Gd2O3/r-HDPE composites with varying Gd2O3 contents.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Functional groups determined using FTIR of (a) silane coupling agent (KBE903) and non-treated Gd2O3 particles and (b) treated Gd2O3 particles with varying KBE903 contents (5, 10, 15, and 20 g/100 g Gd2O3).
Figure 4
Figure 4
SEM-EDX mapping showing the distribution of Gd elements in the 20 wt% Gd2O3/r-HDPE composites, with varying silane (KBE903) contents of (a) 5 g, (b) 10 g, (c) 15 g, and (d) 20 g per 100 g of Gd2O3. Dotted circles indicate areas with Gd agglomeration.
Figure 5
Figure 5
SEM images showing fractured surfaces of 20 wt% Gd2O3/r-HDPE composites with varying KBE903 contents of (a) 0, (b) 5 g, and (c) 20 g per 100 g of Gd2O3.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Thermal stability of Gd2O3/r-HDPE composites with varying Gd2O3 contents (0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 wt%), determined through TGA, with (a) correlations between remaining weight of r-HDPE composites and temperature and (b) correlations between derivative weight of r-HDPE composites and temperature.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Thermal stability of Gd2O3, determined through TGA. The dotted circle indicates the remaining weight (%) of Gd2O3 particles at 600 °C.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Neutron transmission ratios of (a) non-aged Gd2O3/r-HDPE composites and (b) gamma-aged Gd2O3/r-HDPE composites, with varying Gd2O3 contents and sample thicknesses, where error bars indicate ± standard deviation.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Thermal-neutron-shielding properties, consisting of (a) total macroscopic cross section (∑t), (b) mass attenuation coefficient (∑t/ρ), (c) half-value layer (HVL), and (d) tenth value layer (TVL) of non-aged Gd2O3/r-HDPE composites (solid lines) and gamma-aged Gd2O3/r-HDPE composites (dotted lines), where error bars indicate ± standard deviation.
Figure 10
Figure 10
SEM-EDX mapping of Gd distribution in Gd2O3/r-HDPE composites with varying Gd2O3 contents of (a) 5 wt%, (b) 10 wt%, (c), 15 wt%, and (d) 20 wt%. Dotted circles indicate areas with visible Gd agglomeration.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Mechanical properties, consisting of (a) tensile modulus, (b) tensile strength, (c) elongation at break, and (d) hardness (Shore D) of non-aged Gd2O3/r-HDPE composites (solid lines) and gamma-aged Gd2O3/r-HDPE composites (dotted lines), where error bars indicate ± standard deviation.
Figure 12
Figure 12
SEM images showing morphologies and particle distributions in (a) a pristine r-HDPE, and Gd2O3/r-HDPE composites with varying Gd2O3 contents of (b) 5 wt%, (c) 10 wt%, (d), 15 wt%, and (e) 20 wt%. Dotted circles indicate areas with visible particle agglomeration.

Similar articles

References

    1. Kardjilov N., Manke I., Hilger A., Strobl M., Banhart J. Neutron imaging in materials science. Mater. Today. 2011;14:248–256. doi: 10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70139-0. - DOI
    1. Kardjilov N., Manke I., Woracek R., Hilger A., Banhart J. Advances in neutron imaging. Mater. Today. 2018;21:652–672. doi: 10.1016/j.mattod.2018.03.001. - DOI
    1. Moss R.L. Critical review, with an optimistic outlook, on Boron Neutron Capture Therapy (BNCT) Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2014;88:2–11. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2013.11.109. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ohta M., Kwon S., Sato S., Ochiai K., Suzuki H. Investigation of Mo-99 radioisotope production by d-Li neutron source. Nucl. Mater. Energy. 2018;15:261–266. doi: 10.1016/j.nme.2018.05.017. - DOI
    1. Meier W.R., Abbott R., Beach R., Blink J., Caird J., Erlandson A., Farmer J., Halsey W., Ladran T., Latkowski J., et al. Systems modeling for the Laser Fusion-Fission Energy (LIFE) power plant. Fusion Sci. Technol. 2009;56:647–651. doi: 10.13182/FST18-P2.32. - DOI