Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Apr 10;12(4):403.
doi: 10.3390/vaccines12040403.

Inclusion of Anti-Tick Vaccines into an Integrated Tick Management Program in Mexico: A Public Policy Challenge

Affiliations
Review

Inclusion of Anti-Tick Vaccines into an Integrated Tick Management Program in Mexico: A Public Policy Challenge

Rodrigo Rosario-Cruz et al. Vaccines (Basel). .

Abstract

Acaricides are the most widely used method to control the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus. However, its use increases production costs, contaminates food and the environment, and directly affects animal and human health. The intensive use of chemical control has resulted in the selection of genes associated with resistance to acaricides, and consumers are increasingly less tolerant of food contamination. This scenario has increased the interest of different research groups around the world for anti-tick vaccine development, in order to reduce the environmental impact, the presence of residues in food, and the harmful effects on animal and human health. There is enough evidence that vaccination with tick antigens induces protection against tick infestations, reducing tick populations and acaricide treatments. Despite the need for an anti-tick vaccine in Mexico, vaccination against ticks has been limited to one vaccine that is used in some regions. The aim of this review is to contribute to the discussion on tick control issues and provide a reference for readers interested in the importance of using anti-tick vaccines encouraging concerted action on the part of Mexican animal health authorities, livestock organizations, cattle producers, and academics. Therefore, it is suggested that an anti-tick vaccine should be included as a part of an integrated tick management program in Mexico.

Keywords: Rhipicephalus microplus; tick control; tick vaccines; ticks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this manuscript.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The frequent use of acaricides to control ticks acts as a selection pressure directly on their genome, which implies the selection of genes associated with resistance to acaricides in the progeny of ticks. This process will invariably lead to the gradual emergence of resistance to acaricides in the short term. (Artwork by Fernando Rosario Dominguez).
Figure 2
Figure 2
The One Health paradigm is a tripartite initiative by the World Health Organization (WHO), the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), and the World Organization for Animal Health (WOAH), recognizing the interconnection and interdependence of human, animal, and environmental health, within the concept of one single health. (Artwork by Fernando Rosario Dominguez).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cattle tick control is an issue that must be addressed in an integrated manner, so that public policies will have a scientific basis, leading to intelligent solutions and research actions focused on the control of TTBDs and the promotion of animal health, food safety, and environmental protection. (Artwork by Fernando Rosario Dominguez).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Reverse vaccinology has evolved from the use of single-gene recombinant vaccines to multi-epitope chimeric vaccines (a vaccinomic approach); however, the vaccine’s mode of action to control ticks after tick feeding remains the same in both cases. CTL, cytotoxic T lymphocytes; HTL, helper T lymphocytes; IFN, interferon; IL, interleukin. (Artwork by Fernando Rosario Dominguez).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lee R., Opdebeeck J.P. Arthropod vaccines. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 1999;13:209–226. doi: 10.1016/S0891-5520(05)70051-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. de la Fuente J., Estrada-Pena A., Venzal J.M., Kocan K.M., Sonenshine D.E. Overview: Ticks as vectors of pathogens that cause disease in humans and animals. Front. Biosc. 2008;13:6938–6946. doi: 10.2741/3200. - DOI - PubMed
    1. FAO . Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security. FAO; Rome, Italy: 2016. [(accessed on 20 March 2024)]. The state of food and agriculture. Available online: http://www.fao.org/3/i6030e/i6030e.pdf.
    1. Parola P., Raoult D. Ticks and tick borne bacterial diseases in humans: An emerging infectious threat. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2001;32:897–928. doi: 10.1086/319347. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Furman D.P., Loomis E.C. University of California Publications, Bulletin of the California Insect Survey. Volume 25. University of California Press; Berkeley, CA, USA: 1984. The Ticks of California (Acari: Ixodidae) pp. 1–35.

LinkOut - more resources