Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 27;14(1):9675.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60062-1.

Horizontal mapping of time-related words in first and second language

Affiliations

Horizontal mapping of time-related words in first and second language

Anastasia Malyshevskaya et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

The existence of a consistent horizontal spatial-conceptual mapping for words denoting time is a well-established phenomenon. For example, words related to the past or future (e.g., yesterday/tomorrow) facilitate respective leftward/rightward attentional shifts and responses, suggesting the visual-spatial grounding of temporal semantics, at least in the native language (L1). To examine whether similar horizontal bias also accompanies access to time-related words in a second language (L2), we tested 53 Russian-English (Experiment 1) and 48 German-English (Experiment 2) bilinguals, who classified randomly presented L1 and L2 time-related words as past- or future-related using left or right response keys. The predicted spatial congruency effect was registered in all tested languages and, furthermore, was positively associated with higher L2 proficiency in Experiment 2. Our findings (1) support the notion of horizontal spatial-conceptual mapping in diverse L1s, (2) demonstrate the existence of a similar spatial bias when processing temporal words in L2, and (3) show that the strength of time-space association in L2 may depend on individual L2 proficiency.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Example L2 stimulus and experimental trial sequence.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distributions of L2 proficiency across the participant samples in Experiments 1 and Experiment 2. Note: X-axes represent scores obtained from Cambridge General English Test.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Experiment 2. Differences in congruency depending on L2 proficiency. Note: Interaction between L2 Proficiency (low/high) and Congruency (congruent / incongruent). Mean RTs in ms. Error bars represent standard errors.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Estes Z, Barsalou LW. A Comprehensive meta-analysis of spatial interference from linguistic cues: Beyond Petrova et al. (2018) Psychol. Sci. 2018;29:1558–1564. doi: 10.1177/0956797618794131. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fischer MH, Shaki S. Spatial associations in numerical cognition—from single digits to arithmetic. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 2014;67:1461–1483. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.927515. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Macnamara A, Keage HAD, Loetscher T. Mapping of non-numerical domains on space: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Exp. Brain Res. 2018;236:335–346. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-5154-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kumcu A, Thompson RL. Remembering spatial words: Sensorimotor simulation affects verbal recognition memory. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 2022;75:1694–1710. doi: 10.1177/17470218211059011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Richardson DC, Spivey MJ, Barsalou LW, McRae K. Spatial representations activated during real-time comprehension of verbs. Cogn. Sci. 2003;27:767–780.