Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May;38(5):e15312.
doi: 10.1111/ctr.15312.

Recipient donor sex combinations in solid organ transplantation and impact on clinical outcome: A scoping review

Christian Tibor Josef Magyar  1 , Charlene Pierrine Gretener  1 , Patricia Baldi  1 , Federico Storni  1 , Corina Kim-Fuchs  1 , Daniel Candinas  1 , Annalisa Berzigotti  1 , Matthias Knecht  1 , Guido Beldi  1 , Cédric Hirzel  2 , Daniel Sidler  3 , David Reineke  4 , Vanessa Banz  1
Affiliations
Free article

Recipient donor sex combinations in solid organ transplantation and impact on clinical outcome: A scoping review

Christian Tibor Josef Magyar et al. Clin Transplant. 2024 May.
Free article

Abstract

Introduction: Solid organ transplantation (SOT) is a lifesaving treatment for end-stage organ failure. Although many factors affect the success of organ transplantation, recipient and donor sex are important biological factors influencing transplant outcome. However, the impact of the four possible recipient and donor sex combinations (RDSC) on transplant outcome remains largely unclear.

Methods: A scoping review was carried out focusing on studies examining the association between RDSC and outcomes (mortality, graft rejection, and infection) after heart, lung, liver, and kidney transplantation. All studies up to February 2023 were included.

Results: Multiple studies published between 1998 and 2022 show that RDSC is an important factor affecting the outcome after organ transplantation. Male recipients of SOT have a higher risk of mortality and graft failure than female recipients. Differences regarding the causes of death are observed. Female recipients on the other hand are more susceptible to infections after SOT.

Conclusion: Differences in underlying illnesses as well as age, immunosuppressive therapy and underlying biological mechanisms among male and female SOT recipients affect the post-transplant outcome. However, the precise mechanisms influencing the interaction between RDSC and post-transplant outcome remain largely unclear. A better understanding of how to identify and modulate these factors may improve outcome, which is particularly important in light of the worldwide organ shortage. An analysis for differences of etiology and causes of graft loss or mortality, respectively, is warranted across the RDSC groups.

Practitioner points: Recipient and donor sex combinations affect outcome after solid organ transplantation. While female recipients are more susceptible to infections after solid organ transplantation, they have higher overall survival following SOT, with causes of death differing from male recipients. Sex-differences should be taken into account in the post-transplant management.

Keywords: donor‐recipient matching; graft dysfunction; infection; mortality; recipient donor sex combination (RDSC); solid organ transplantation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

  • Recipient-Donor Sex Constellation in Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma-An ELTR Study.
    Magyar CTJ, Arteaga NF, Germani G, Karam VH, Adam R, Romagnoli R, De Simone P, Robin F, Cherqui D, Boscà A, Mazzaferro V, Fundora Y, Heneghan M, Llado L, Lesurtel M, Cescon M, Mirza D, Cavelti A, Christen L, Storni F, Kim-Fuchs C, Lachenmayer A, Beldi G, Candinas D, Radu IP, Schwacha-Eipper B, Berzigotti A, Banz V; European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association (ELITA). Magyar CTJ, et al. Liver Int. 2025 Jan;45(1):e16178. doi: 10.1111/liv.16178. Epub 2024 Nov 20. Liver Int. 2025. PMID: 39564600 Free PMC article.

References

REFERENCES

    1. Tejada S, Martinez‐Reviejo R, Nogueira TA, et al. The effect of sex inequality on solid organ transplantation: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Eur J Intern Med. 2023:109:58‐67.
    1. Reddy KD, Oliver BGG. Sexual dimorphism in chronic respiratory diseases. Cell Biosci. 2023;13(1):1‐16.
    1. Lefebvre P, Staels B. Hepatic sexual dimorphism — implications for non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2021;17(11):662‐670.
    1. Klein SL, Jedlicka A, Pekosz A. The Xs and Y of immune responses to viral vaccines. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010;10(5):338‐349.
    1. Engler RJM, Nelson MR, Klote MM, et al. Half‐ vs full‐dose trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (2004‐2005): age, dose, and sex effects on immune responses. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(22):2405‐2414.

Publication types