Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 17:33:100733.
doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100733. eCollection 2024 May.

Post-COVID-19 respiratory sequelae two years after hospitalization: an ambidirectional study

Affiliations

Post-COVID-19 respiratory sequelae two years after hospitalization: an ambidirectional study

Carlos Roberto Ribeiro Carvalho et al. Lancet Reg Health Am. .

Abstract

Background: COVID-19 lung sequelae can impact the course of patient lives. We investigated the evolution of pulmonary abnormalities in post-COVID-19 patients 18-24 months after hospital discharge.

Methods: A cohort of COVID-19 patients admitted to the Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP in São Paulo, Brazil, between March and August of 2020, were followed-up 6-12 months after hospital discharge. A subset of patients with pulmonary involvement and chest computed tomography (CT) scans were eligible to participate in this second follow-up (18-24 months). Data was analyzed in an ambidirectional manner, including retrospective data from the hospitalization, and from the first follow-up (6-12 months after discharge), and compared with the prospective data collected in this new follow-up.

Findings: From 348 patients eligible, 237 (68%) participated in this follow-up. Among participants, 139 (58%) patients presented ground-glass opacities and reticulations, and 80 (33%) presented fibrotic-like lesions (traction bronchiectasis and architectural distortion). Five (2%) patients improved compared to the 6-12-month assessment, but 20 (25%) of 80 presented worsening of lung abnormalities. For those with relevant assessments on both occasions, comparing the CT findings between this follow-up with the previous assessment, there was an increase in patients with architectural distortion (43 [21%] of 204 vs 57 [28%] of 204, p = 0.0093), as well as in traction bronchiectasis (55 [27%] of 204 vs 69 [34%] of 204, p = 0.0043). Patients presented a persistent functional impairment with demonstrated restrictive pattern in both follow-ups (87 [42%] of 207 vs 91 [44%] of 207, p = 0.76), as well as for the reduced diffusion capacity (88 [42%] of 208 vs 87 [42%] of 208, p = 1.0). Length of hospitalization (OR 1.04 [1.01-1.07], p = 0.0040), invasive mechanical ventilation (OR 3.11 [1.3-7.5] p = 0.011), patient's age (OR 1.03 [1.01-1.06] p = 0.0074 were consistent predictors for development of fibrotic-like lung lesions in post-COVID-19 patients.

Interpretation: Post-COVID-19 lung sequelae can persist and progress after hospital discharge, suggesting airways involvement and formation of new fibrotic-like lesions, mainly in patients who were in intensive care unit (ICU).

Funding: São Paulo Research Foundation (22/01769-5) and Instituto Todos pela Saúde (C1721).

Keywords: Ambidirectional cohort; COVID-19; Fibrosis; Lung CT; PASC; Pulmonary function; Small airways disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow-chart for selecting participating patients in the 2nd follow-up (FUP). CT (computed tomography), CXR (chest X-ray), FVC (forced vital capacity), LLN (lower limit of normal), mMRC (modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Score).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Summarized flow-chart for the 1st and the 2nd follow-up (FUP), including the number of participants and the exams performed in each phase. CXR (Chest X-Ray), CT (Computed tomography), mMRC (modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Score), CRP (C-Reactive Protein), PFTs (Pulmonary Function Tests).

References

    1. Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C., Palacios-Ceña D., Gómez-Mayordomo V., et al. Prevalence of post-COVID-19 symptoms in hospitalized and non-hospitalized COVID-19 survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Intern Med. 2021;92:55–70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2021.06.009. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nalbandian A., Sehgal K., Gupta A., et al. Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome. Nat Med. 2021;27:601–615. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01283-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ballouz T., Menges D., Anagnostopoulos A., et al. Recovery and symptom trajectories up to two years after SARS-CoV-2 infection: population based, longitudinal cohort study. BMJ. 2023;381:e074425–e074438. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-074425. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Parotto M., Gyöngyösi M., Howe K., et al. Post-acute sequelae of COVID-19: understanding and addressing the burden of multisystem manifestations. Lancet Respir Med. 2023;11:739–754. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00239-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Huang Y., Tan C., Wu J., et al. Impact of coronavirus disease 2019 on pulmonary function in early convalescence phase. Respir Res. 2020;21:163. doi: 10.1186/s12931-020-01429-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources