Selecting the appropriate patients for coronary artery bypass grafting in ischemic cardiomyopathy-importance of myocardial viability
- PMID: 38681722
- PMCID: PMC11045715
- DOI: 10.1007/s12055-023-01671-9
Selecting the appropriate patients for coronary artery bypass grafting in ischemic cardiomyopathy-importance of myocardial viability
Abstract
Patients who undergo coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery in ischemic cardiomyopathy have a survival advantage over medical therapy at 10 years. The survival advantage of CABG over medical therapy is due to its ability to reduce future myocardial infarction, and by conferring electrical stability. The presence of myocardial viability does not provide a differential survival advantage for CABG over medical therapy. Presence of angina and inducible ischemia are also less predictive of outcome. Moreover, CABG is associated with significant early mortality. Hence, careful patient selection is more important for reducing the early mortality and improving the long-term outcome than relying on results of myocardial viability. Younger patients with good exercise tolerance benefit the most, while patients who are frail and patients with renal dysfunction and dysfunctional right ventricle seem to have very high operative mortality. Elderly patients, because of poor life expectancy, do not benefit from CABG, but the age cutoff is not clear. Patients also need to have revascularizable targets, but this decision is often based on experience of the surgical team and heart team discussion. These recommendations are irrespective of the myocardial viability tests. Optimal medical treatment remains the cornerstone for management of ischemic cardiomyopathy.
Keywords: CABG; Coronary artery bypass grafting; Ischemic cardiomyopathy; Left ventricular dysfunction; STICH trial.
© Indian Association of Cardiovascular-Thoracic Surgeons 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interestThe authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Hypotheses, rationale, design, and methods for prognostic evaluation of a randomized comparison between patients with coronary artery disease associated with ischemic cardiomyopathy who undergo medical or surgical treatment: MASS-VI (HF).Trials. 2020 Apr 16;21(1):337. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04270-w. Trials. 2020. PMID: 32299458 Free PMC article.
-
Myocardial Viability and Long-Term Outcomes in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.N Engl J Med. 2019 Aug 22;381(8):739-748. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1807365. N Engl J Med. 2019. PMID: 31433921 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Influence of Baseline Characteristics, Operative Conduct, and Postoperative Course on 30-Day Outcomes of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Among Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction: Results From the Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) Trial.Circulation. 2015 Aug 25;132(8):720-30. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014932. Circulation. 2015. PMID: 26304663 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Myocardial Revascularization in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: For Whom and How.J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Mar 21;12(6):e026943. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.026943. Epub 2023 Mar 9. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023. PMID: 36892041 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Outcomes of Percutaneous Revascularization in Severe Ischemic Left Ventricular Dysfunction.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2024 May;26(5):435-442. doi: 10.1007/s11886-024-02045-2. Epub 2024 Apr 20. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2024. PMID: 38642298 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Uretsky BF, Thygesen K, Armstrong PW, Cleland JG, Horowitz JD, Massie BM, et al. Acute coronary findings at autopsy in heart failure patients with sudden death: results from the Assessment of Treatment with Lisinopril and Survival (ATLAS) trial. Circulation. 2000;102:611–616. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.102.6.611. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources