Continuous Positive Airway Pressure-Assisted Breathing With Supine Tangential Left Breast Radiation Therapy When Deep Inspiration Breath-Hold Radiation Therapy Was Ineffective or Unsuitable: Clinical Implications for an Affordable Heart-Sparing Breast Radiation Therapy to Reduce the Health Care Disparities in Low-Resource Settings
- PMID: 38681888
- PMCID: PMC11043812
- DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101472
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure-Assisted Breathing With Supine Tangential Left Breast Radiation Therapy When Deep Inspiration Breath-Hold Radiation Therapy Was Ineffective or Unsuitable: Clinical Implications for an Affordable Heart-Sparing Breast Radiation Therapy to Reduce the Health Care Disparities in Low-Resource Settings
Abstract
Purpose: To report continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)-assisted breathing with supine tangential left breast radiation therapy (CPAP-RT) when deep inspiration breath-hold RT (DIBH-RT) was ineffective or unsuitable.
Methods and materials: Ten patients with left breast cancer underwent computed tomography simulation scan (CT-sim) under DIBH followed by CPAP-assisted breathing (15 cm H2O) to create CPAP-RT plans in authors' institute. Reasons for CPAP-RT include inability to reproduce DIBH (n = 5), DIBH-RT plan exceeded dose limits to the heart (n = 2), and unable to proceed with planned DIBH-RT due to mechanical issues (n = 3). Radiation target volumes and organs at risk were contoured according to published atlas data. For dosimetric comparison, supine tangential fields for breast only RT (Breast-RT) and wide-tangential fields for breast + internal mammary nodal RT (Breast + IMN-RT) were used with prescription of 40 Gy in 15 fractions on each patients' CT-sim with free-breathing (FB), DIBH, and CPAP-assisted breathing, respectively.
Results: Planning target volume (PTV) coverage was acceptable and comparable in all RT plans. Compared with FB, both DIBH and CPAP-assisted breathing inflated the thorax and increased left lung volume on average by 46% and 51%, respectively (FB: 1230 vs DIBH: 1802 vs CPAP-assisted breathing:1860 cc, P < .01), and increased the shortest distance between PTVeval-Breast to the heart by 5.6 ± 3.0 and 11.9 ± 3.6 mm (P < .01) and to LAD by 4.9 ± 2.9 and 10.8 ± 4.3 mm, respectively (P < .01). Compared with FB, both DIBH and CPAP significantly reduced radiation dose to the heart and LAD. A mean dose to the heart (HeartDmean) was FB: 2.3 ± 0.9, DIBH: 1.2 ± 0.7, and CPAP: 0.9 ± 0.4 Gy in Breast-RT (P < .01); FB: 3.2 ± 1.7, DIBH: 1.7 ± 0.8, and CPAP: 1.3 ± 0.5 Gy in Breast + IMN-RT (P < .01). LADDmean was FB: 11 ± 4.5, DIBH: 5.4 ± 3.2, and CPAP: 2.4 ± 0.9 Gy in Breast-RT (P < .01); FB: 15.5 ± 7.8, DIBH: 7.4 ± 4.1, and CPAP: 3.5 ± 1.4 Gy in Breast + IMN-RT (P < .01). A maximum dose to LAD (LADDmax) was FB: 35.8 ± 8.7, DIBH: 22.4 ± 15.4, and CPAP: 7.8 ± 5.3 Gy in Breast-RT (P < .01); FB: 38.7 ± 5.0, DIBH: 25.3 ± 15.2, and CPAP: 10.2 ± 6.8 Gy in Breast + IMN-RT (P < .01). All patients successfully completed CPAP-RT.
Conclusions: CPAP-RT provides efficient and practical heart and LAD sparing RT using simple supine tangential fields for Breast-RT or wide-tangential fields for Breast + IMN-RT when DIBH-RT was ineffective or unsuitable. With its easy accessibility and low infrastructural requirement, CPAP-RT can provide affordable heart-sparing left breast RT to reduce the health care disparities in low-resource settings.
© 2024 The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Continuous positive airway pressure with deep inspiration breath hold in left-sided breast radiation therapy.Med Dosim. 2021 Summer;46(2):127-131. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2020.09.006. Epub 2020 Oct 2. Med Dosim. 2021. PMID: 33020023
-
Practical Heart Sparing Breast Cancer Radiation Therapy Using Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) in Resource-Limited Radiation Oncology Clinics.Am J Clin Oncol. 2019 Oct;42(10):797-801. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000597. Am J Clin Oncol. 2019. PMID: 31503062
-
Dosimetric Comparison of CPAP and DIBH for Left-sided Breast Cancer Radiation Therapy.Adv Radiat Oncol. 2024 Feb 17;9(6):101478. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101478. eCollection 2024 Jun. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38681894 Free PMC article.
-
A Systematic Review of Deep Inspiration Breath Hold and Free Breathing in Proton Beam Therapy Plans for Breast Cancer Radiotherapy.Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2025 Apr;40:103782. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2025.103782. Epub 2025 Feb 1. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2025. PMID: 39999640
-
Comparison of Techniques for Involved-Site Radiation Therapy in Patients With Lower Mediastinal Lymphoma.Pract Radiat Oncol. 2019 Nov;9(6):426-434. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2019.05.009. Epub 2019 May 22. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2019. PMID: 31128302 Review.
References
-
- Chino JP, Marks LB. Prone positioning causes the heart to be displaced anteriorly within the thorax: Implications for breast cancer treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;70:916–920. - PubMed
-
- Gielda BT, Strauss JB, Marsh JC, Turian JV, Griem KL. A dosimetric comparison between the supine and prone positions for three-field intact breast radiotherapy. Am J Clin Oncol. 2011;34:223–230. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources