Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Apr 29:63:230-239.
doi: 10.2340/1651-226X.2024.24204.

The effect of psychosocial interventions for sexual health in patients with pelvic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Samuel Ask  1 , Kristina Schildmeijer  2 , Viktor Kaldo  3 , Amanda Hellström  2
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

The effect of psychosocial interventions for sexual health in patients with pelvic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Samuel Ask et al. Acta Oncol. .

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to explore and evaluate the effect of psychosocial interventions in improving sexual health outcomes among post-treatment patients with pelvic cancer.

Methods: Inclusion and exclusion criteria were pelvic cancer survivors; psychosocial interventions; studies with a control group and measures of sexual health. Five databases were searched for literature along with an inspection of the included studies' reference lists to extend the search. Risk of bias was assessed with the RoB2 tool. Standardised mean difference (SMD) with a random effects model was used to determine the effect size of psychosocial interventions for sexual health in patients with pelvic cancers.

Results: Thirteen studies were included, with a total number of 1,541 participants. There was a large heterogeneity regarding the type of psychosocial intervention used with the source found in a leave one out analysis. Six studies showed statistically significant improvements in sexual health, while three showed positive but non-significant effects. The summary effect size estimate was small SMD = 0.24 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.05 to 0.42, p = 0.01).

Discussion: There is limited research on psychosocial interventions for sexual health in pelvic cancer patients. There are also limitations in the different pelvic cancer diagnoses examined. Commonly, the included articles examined physical function rather than the whole sexual health spectrum. The small effect sizes may in part be due to evaluation of psychosocial interventions by measuring physical dysfunction. Future research should broaden sexual health assessment tools and expand investigations to more cancer types.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of included studies.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot showing the observed outcomes and the estimate of the random effects model.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Funnel plot.
Figure 4
Figure 4
GOSH plot highlighting influence of study 8.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization . Cancer prevention and control in the context of an integrated approach [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016. [cited 2023 Sep 08]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/EB140/B140_31-en.pdf
    1. WHO. World Health Organization . Global health estimates: leading causes of death 2022 [cited 2023 Sep 08]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/EB140/B140_31-en.pdf
    1. Allemani C, Matsuda T, Di Carlo V, Harewood R, Matz M, Nikšić M, et al. . Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000–14 (CONCORD-3): analysis of individual records for 37 513 025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries. Lancet. 2018;391(10125):1023–1075. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33326-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Odeo S, Degu A. Factors affecting health-related quality of life among prostate cancer patients: a systematic review. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2020;26(8):1997–2010. 10.1177/1078155220959414 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Roussin M, Lowe J, Hamilton A, Martin L. Factors of sexual quality of life in gynaecological cancers: a systematic literature review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021;304(3):791–805. 10.1007/s00404-021-06056-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources