Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 May;30(5):e17276.
doi: 10.1111/gcb.17276.

The biological controls of soil carbon accumulation following wildfire and harvest in boreal forests: A review

Michael J Gundale  1 , E Petter Axelsson  2 , Vincent Buness  1 , Timon Callebaut  3 , Thomas H DeLuca  4 , Stefan F Hupperts  1 , Theresa S Ibáñez  2 , Daniel B Metcalfe  3 , Marie-Charlotte Nilsson  1 , Matthias Peichl  1 , Clydecia M Spitzer  1 , Zsofia R Stangl  1 , Joachim Strengbom  5 , Maja K Sundqvist  1 , David A Wardle  3 , Björn D Lindahl  6
Affiliations
Review

The biological controls of soil carbon accumulation following wildfire and harvest in boreal forests: A review

Michael J Gundale et al. Glob Chang Biol. 2024 May.

Abstract

Boreal forests are frequently subjected to disturbances, including wildfire and clear-cutting. While these disturbances can cause soil carbon (C) losses, the long-term accumulation dynamics of soil C stocks during subsequent stand development is controlled by biological processes related to the balance of net primary production (NPP) and outputs via heterotrophic respiration and leaching, many of which remain poorly understood. We review the biological processes suggested to influence soil C accumulation in boreal forests. Our review indicates that median C accumulation rates following wildfire and clear-cutting are similar (0.15 and 0.20 Mg ha-1 year-1, respectively), however, variation between studies is extremely high. Further, while many individual studies show linear increases in soil C stocks through time after disturbance, there are indications that C stock recovery is fastest early to mid-succession (e.g. 15-80 years) and then slows as forests mature (e.g. >100 years). We indicate that the rapid build-up of soil C in younger stands appears not only driven by higher plant production, but also by a high rate of mycorrhizal hyphal production, and mycorrhizal suppression of saprotrophs. As stands mature, the balance between reductions in plant and mycorrhizal production, increasing plant litter recalcitrance, and ectomycorrhizal decomposers and saprotrophs have been highlighted as key controls on soil C accumulation rates. While some of these controls appear well understood (e.g. temporal patterns in NPP, changes in aboveground litter quality), many others remain research frontiers. Notably, very little data exists describing and comparing successional patterns of root production, mycorrhizal functional traits, mycorrhizal-saprotroph interactions, or C outputs via heterotrophic respiration and dissolved organic C following different disturbances. We argue that these less frequently described controls require attention, as they will be key not only for understanding ecosystem C balances, but also for representing these dynamics more accurately in soil organic C and Earth system models.

Keywords: decomposition; disturbance; forest succession; heterotrophic respiration; humus; mycorrhizae; organic horizon; soil carbon.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES
    1. Aerts, R., & Chapin, F. S. (2000). The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: A re‐evaluation of processes and patterns. In A. H. Fitter & D. G. Raffaelli (Eds.), Advances in ecological research (Vol. 30, pp. 1–67). Elsevier.
    1. Agerer, R. (2001). Exploration types of ectomycorrhizae—A proposal to classify ectomycorrhizal mycelial systems according to their patterns of differentiation and putative ecological importance. Mycorrhiza, 11, 107–114.
    1. Ågren, G. I., Axelsson, B., Flower‐Ellis, J. G. K., Linder, S., Persson, H., Staaf, H., & Troeng, E. (1980). Annual Carbon Budget for a Young Scots Pine. Ecological Bulletins, 32, 307–313.
    1. Amiro, B. D., Chen, J. M., & Liu, J. (2000). Net primary productivity following forest fire for Canadian ecoregions. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 30, 939–947.
    1. Amiro, B. D., MacPherson, J. I., Desjardins, R. L., Chen, J. M., & Liu, J. (2003). Post‐fire carbon dioxide fluxes in the western Canadian boreal forest: Evidence from towers, aircraft and remote sensing. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 115, 91–107.
Data Sources
    1. Alban, D. H. (1982). Effects of nutrient accumulation by Aspen, spruce, and pine on soil properties. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 46, 853–861.
    1. Alriksson, A. E., & Hillevi, M. (1998). Variations in mineral nutrient and C distribution in the soil and vegetation compartments of five temperate tree species in NE Sweden. Forest Ecology and Management, 108, 261–273.
    1. Andrieux, B., Beguin, J., Bergeron, Y., Grondin, P., & Paré, D. (2018). Drivers of postfire soil organic carbon accumulation in the boreal forest. Global Change Biology, 24, 4797–4815.
    1. Bill, K. E., Dieleman, C. M., Baltzer, J. L., Degré‐Timmons, G., Mack, M. C., Day, N. J., Cumming, S. G., Walker, X. J., & Turetsky, M. R. (2023). Post‐fire recovery of soil organic layer carbon in Canadian boreal forests. Ecosystems, 26, 1623–1639.
    1. Bjarnadottir, B. (2009). Carbon stocks and fluxes in a young Siberian larch (Larix sibirica) plantation in Iceland. Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science, University of Lund.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources