Comparison of the perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal versus retraperitoneal partial nephrectomy for posterior-lateral renal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 38683492
- DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01963-1
Comparison of the perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal versus retraperitoneal partial nephrectomy for posterior-lateral renal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
The study aims to assess the available literature and compare the perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for posterior-lateral renal tumors using transperitoneal (TP) and retroperitoneal (RP) approaches. Systematically searched the Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases for literature. Eligible studies were those that compared TP-RAPN and RP-RAPN for posterior-lateral renal tumors. The data from the included studies were analyzed and summarized using Review Manager 5.3, which involved comparing baseline patient and tumor characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes, and oncological outcomes. The analysis included five studies meeting the inclusion criteria, with a total of 1440 patients (814 undergoing RP-RAPN and 626 undergoing TP-RAPN). Both groups showed no significant differences in age, gender, BMI, R.E.N.A.L. score, and tumor size. Notably, compared to TP-RAPN, the RP-RAPN group demonstrated shorter operative time (OT) (MD: 17.25, P = 0.01), length of hospital stay (LOS) (MD: 0.37, P < 0.01), and lower estimated blood loss (EBL) (MD: 15.29, P < 0.01). However, no significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of warm ischemia time (WIT) (MD: -0.34, P = 0.69), overall complications (RR: 1.25, P = 0.09), major complications (the Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ 3) (RR: 0.97, P = 0.93), and positive surgical margin (PSM) (RR: 1.06, P = 0.87). The systematic review and meta-analysis suggests RP-RAPN may be more advantageous for posterior-lateral renal tumors in terms of OT, EBL, and LOS, but no significant differences were found in WIT, overall complications, major complications, and PSM. Both surgical approaches are safe, but a definitive advantage remains uncertain.
Keywords: Kidney neoplasms; Patient Outcome Assessment; Posterior-lateral tumors; Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy; Robotic Surgical Procedures.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies Reporting Perioperative Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy.J Endourol. 2017 Sep;31(9):893-909. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0351. Epub 2017 Mar 29. J Endourol. 2017. PMID: 27305835
-
Comparisons of surgical outcomes between transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches in robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for lateral renal tumors: a propensity score-matched comparative analysis.J Robot Surg. 2021 Feb;15(1):99-104. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01086-3. Epub 2020 May 1. J Robot Surg. 2021. PMID: 32358741
-
Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Int J Surg. 2016 Jun;30:109-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.04.023. Epub 2016 Apr 20. Int J Surg. 2016. PMID: 27107660
-
Trans-peritoneal vs. retroperitoneal robotic assisted partial nephrectomy in posterior renal tumours: need for a risk-stratified patient individualised approach. A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Robot Surg. 2020 Feb;14(1):1-9. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-00973-8. Epub 2019 May 14. J Robot Surg. 2020. PMID: 31089965
-
Comparison of Therapeutic Effects Among Different Surgical Approaches in Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Endourol. 2021 May;35(5):623-632. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0432. Epub 2020 Nov 12. J Endourol. 2021. PMID: 33076702
Cited by
-
Comparison of the effects of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Nov;40(10):2202-2207. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.10.10613. Pak J Med Sci. 2024. PMID: 39554681 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, Jemal A (2023) Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 73(1):17–48. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21763 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Schaeffer EM, Srinivas S, Adra N et al (2023) Prostate cancer, version 4.2023, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 21(10):1067–1096. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2023.0050 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Carbonara U, Simone G, Minervini A et al (2021) Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy for “very small” (<2 cm) renal mass: results of a multicenter contemporary cohort. Eur Urol Focus 7(5):1115–1120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2020.10.001 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ghani KR, Porter J, Menon M, Rogers C (2014) Robotic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy: a step-by-step guide. BJU Int 114(2):311–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12709 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Fan X, Xu K, Lin T et al (2013) Comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJU Int 111(4):611–621. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11598.x - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous