Whole blood versus balanced resuscitation in massive hemorrhage: Six of one or half dozen of the other?
- PMID: 38685202
- DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004366
Whole blood versus balanced resuscitation in massive hemorrhage: Six of one or half dozen of the other?
Abstract
Background: Whole blood (WB) resuscitation is increasingly used at trauma centers. Prior studies investigating outcomes in WB versus component-only (CO) resuscitation have been limited by small cohorts, low volumes of WB resuscitation, and unbalanced CO resuscitation. This study aimed to address these limitations using data from a high-volume Level I trauma center, which adopted a WB-first resuscitation paradigm in 2018. We hypothesized that the resuscitation method, WB or balanced CO, would have no impact on patient mortality.
Methods: A single-center, retrospective cohort study of adults presenting as a trauma activation from July 2016 through July 2021 was performed. Receipt of three or more units of WB or packed red blood cells (RBC) within the first hour of resuscitation was required for inclusion. Patients were grouped into WB versus CO resuscitation and important clinical outcomes were compared. Mortality was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank testing, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling.
Results: There were 180 patients in the WB group and 170 patients in the CO group. Of the 180 WB patients, 110 (61%) received only WB during the first 24 hours. The WB group received a median of 5.0 units (interquartile range, 4.0-8.0) of WB and CO group received a median of 6.0 units (interquartile range, 4.0-11.8) of RBCs during the first 24 hours of resuscitation. In the CO group, median RBC/plasma and RBC/platelet ratios approximated 1:1:1. Groups were similar in clinicopathologic characteristics including age, Injury Severity Score, mechanism of injury, and requirement for hemorrhage control interventions (WB 55% vs. CO 59%, p = 0.60). Unadjusted survival was equivalent at 24 hours ( p = 0.52) and 30 days ( p = 0.70) between both groups on Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank testing. On multivariable Cox regression, WB resuscitation was not independently associated with improved survival after accounting for age, Injury Severity Score, mechanism of injury, and receipt of hemorrhage control procedure (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.61-1.19, p = 0.34).
Conclusion: Balanced CO resuscitation is associated with similar mortality outcomes to that of WB based resuscitation.
Level of evidence: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.
Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
References
-
- Kauvar DS, Lefering R, Wade CE. Impact of hemorrhage on trauma outcome: an overview of epidemiology, clinical presentations, and therapeutic considerations. J Trauma . 2006;60:S3–S11.
-
- Cannon JW, Khan MA, Raja A, Cohen M, Como JJ, Cotton BA, et al. Damage control resuscitation in patients with severe traumatic hemorrhage. A practice management guideline from the eastern Association for the Surgery of trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg . 2017;82:605–617.
-
- Pidcoke HF, Spinella PC, Ramasubramanian AK, Strandenes G, Hervig T, Ness PM, et al. Refrigerated platelets for the treatment of acute bleeding: a review of the literature and reexamination of current standards. Shock . 2014;41:51–53.
-
- Brill JB, Tang B, Hatton G, Mueck KM, McCoy CC, Kao LS, et al. Impact of incorporating whole blood into hemorrhagic shock resuscitation: analysis of 1,377 consecutive trauma patients receiving emergency-release uncrossmatched blood products. J Am Coll Surg . 2022;234:408–418.
-
- Shea SM, Staudt AM, Thomas KA, Schuerer D, Mielke JE, Folkerts D, et al. The use of low-titer group O whole blood is independently associated with improved survival compared to component therapy in adults with severe traumatic hemorrhage. Transfusion . 2022;60:S2–S9.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials