Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis: Is Surgery Still an Option?
- PMID: 38685993
- PMCID: PMC11056630
Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis: Is Surgery Still an Option?
Abstract
Background: The prevailing trend for the treatment of lateral epicondylitis (LE) is nonsurgical. Although many providers consider LE surgery controversial, others consider surgical intervention in patients with recalcitrant symptoms. The purpose of this study is to analyze epidemiological changes in LE surgery over a 9-year period prior to the coronavirus pandemic in 2019.
Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of the Texas health care database from 2010 to 2018 was performed. We analyzed all procedures performed for LE during the set time period using Current Procedure Terminology (CPT) codes. Statistical analyses included procedures performed, patient demographics, zone of residence, and insurance designation.
Results: There were a total of 12802 records of LE with 1 or more associated surgical procedures. Lateral epicondylar debridement (with/without tendon repair) was the most common procedure recorded, followed by arthroscopic procedures and tendon lengthening. Overall incidence remained low and did not significantly change during the studied period; however, surgical case volumes were significantly higher in metropolitan areas and increased at a faster rate when compared with those of more rural regions. Commercial insurance was the most prevailing form of payment. The incidence was significantly higher in the age group between 45 and 64 years old and most commonly performed in Caucasian females.
Conclusions: The benefit of surgery for the treatment of LE has yet to be completely elucidated; however, surgical intervention continues to be offered. Although the incidence of surgery for the treatment of LE remained low over the study period, the volume of cases in metropolitan areas increased at a fast rate between 2010 and 2018. The results of this study found that surgery is still a treatment option in some patients despite the controversy.
Level of evidence: Economic/Decision Analysis, Level IV.
Keywords: Incidence; Lateral Epicondylitis; Surgery; Tennis Elbow.
© 2024 HMP Global. All Rights Reserved. Any views and opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and/or participants and do not necessarily reflect the views, policy, or position of ePlasty or HMP Global, their employees, and affiliates.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosures: The authors disclose no financial or other conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Boyer MI, Hastings H 2nd. Lateral tennis elbow: “Is there any science out there?”. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999;8(5):481-491. doi:10.1016/s1058-2746(99)90081-2 10.1016/S1058-2746(99)90081-2 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Sanders TL Jr, Maradit Kremers H, Bryan AJ, Ransom JE, Smith J, Morrey BF. The epidemiology and health care burden of tennis elbow: a population-based study. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(5):1066-1071. doi:10.1177/0363546514568087 10.1177/0363546514568087 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Degen RM, Conti MS, Camp CL, Altchek DW, Dines JS, Werner BC. Epidemiology and disease burden of lateral epicondylitis in the USA: analysis of 85,318 patients. HSS J. 2018;14(1):9-14. doi:10.1007/s11420-017-9559-3 10.1007/s11420-017-9559-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Gregory BP, Wysocki RW, Cohen MS. Controversies in surgical management of recalcitrant enthesopathy of the extensor carpi radialis brevis. J Hand Surg Am. 2016;41(8):856-859. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.06.010 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.06.010 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Knutsen EJ, Calfee RP, Chen RE, Goldfarb CA, Park KW, Osei DA. Factors associated with failure of nonoperative treatment in lateral epicondylitis. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(9):2133-2137. doi:10.1177/0363546515590220 10.1177/0363546515590220 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources