Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 29;14(20):14126-14138.
doi: 10.1039/d4ra01777c. eCollection 2024 Apr 25.

Characterization and antitumor effect of doxorubicin-loaded Fe3O4-Au nanocomposite synthesized by electron beam evaporation for magnetic nanotheranostics

Affiliations

Characterization and antitumor effect of doxorubicin-loaded Fe3O4-Au nanocomposite synthesized by electron beam evaporation for magnetic nanotheranostics

Valerii B Orel et al. RSC Adv. .

Abstract

Magnetic nanocomposites (MNC) are promising theranostic platforms with tunable physicochemical properties allowing for remote drug delivery and multimodal imaging. Here, we developed doxorubicin-loaded Fe3O4-Au MNC (DOX-MNC) using electron beam physical vapor deposition (EB-PVD) in combination with magneto-mechanochemical synthesis to assess their antitumor effect on Walker-256 carcinosarcoma under the influence of a constant magnetic (CMF) and electromagnetic field (EMF) by comparing tumor growth kinetics, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and electron spin resonance (ESR) spectra. Transmission (TEM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) confirmed the formation of spherical magnetite nanoparticles with a discontinuous gold coating that did not significantly affect the ferromagnetic properties of MNC, as measured by vibrating-sample magnetometry (VSM). Tumor-bearing animals were divided into the control (no treatment), conventional doxorubicin (DOX), DOX-MNC and DOX-MNC + CMF + EMF groups. DOX-MNC + CMF + EMF resulted in 14% and 16% inhibition of tumor growth kinetics as compared with DOX and DOX-MNC, respectively. MRI visualization showed more substantial tumor necrotic changes after the combined treatment. Quantitative analysis of T2-weighted (T2W) images revealed the lowest value of skewness and a significant increase in tumor intensity in response to DOX-MNC + CMF + EMF as compared with the control (1.4 times), DOX (1.6 times) and DOX-MNC (1.8 times) groups. In addition, the lowest level of nitric oxide determined by ESR was found in DOX-MNC + CMF + EMF tumors, which was close to that of the muscle tissue in the contralateral limb. We propose that the reason for the relationship between the observed changes in MRI and ESR is the hyperfine interaction of nuclear and electron spins in mitochondria, as a source of free radical production. Therefore, these results point to the use of EB-PVD and magneto-mechanochemically synthesized Fe3O4-Au MNC loaded with DOX as a potential candidate for cancer magnetic nanotheranostic applications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Schematic representation of Fe3O4–Au MNC synthesis via EB-PVD: (A) iron and sodium chloride are vaporized by an electron beam, then the vapors condense on a cooled substrate, forming iron nanoparticles embedded in NaCl matrix; (B) following oxidation the nanoparticles are coated with gold evaporated from a reactor.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. TEM image (A) and electron pattern (B) of Fe3O4 nanoparticles synthesized using EB-PVD.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. SEM images with increasing magnification from (A) and (B) of Fe3O4–Au MNC: EB-PVD formed island structures of gold (bright spots) on the surface of magnetite nanoparticles (dark spots).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. TEM, FFT images and size distributions of Fe3O4–Au MNC before (A, A′, C and E) and after DOX loading (B, B′, D and F): TEM images with increasing magnification from A to A′ and B to B′; FFT images (C and D): yellow marks correspond to the contributions of gold and red marks correspond to the contributions of Fe3O4; size (nm) distributions (E and F) of Au and Fe3O4 nanoparticles comprising MNC.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Hydrodynamic size (D) of Fe3O4–Au MNC in aqueous solution.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. Magnetic hysteresis loop measured for Fe3O4–Au MNC at room temperature.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7. Growth kinetics of Walker-256 carcinosarcoma: (1) – control (no treatment); (2) – DOX; (3) – DOX-MNC; (4) – DOX-MNC + CMF + EMF.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8. Changes in body weight of Walker-256 carcinosarcoma-bearing animals relative to their weight before implantation. *Significant difference from control, p < 0.05; &significant difference from DOX, p < 0.05; §significant difference from DOX-MNC, p < 0.05.
Fig. 9
Fig. 9. Representative T2W coronal whole-body MRI scans of Walker-256 carcinosarcoma-bearing rats acquired at 18 days after tumor implantation: control (A), DOX (B), DOX-MNC (C), DOX-MNC + CMF + EMF (D). Red circles (1) indicate the tumor ROI; green circles (2) denote the muscle ROI in the contralateral limb; yellow circles outline the background ROI (3).
Fig. 10
Fig. 10. Image histograms of tumor ROIs on T2W MRI scans: control (A); DOX (B); DOX-MNC (C); DOX-MNC + CMF + EMF (D).
Fig. 11
Fig. 11. Electron spin resonance spectra of Walker-256 carcinosarcoma 18 days after implantation: (1) – control (no treatment); (2) – DOX; (3) – DOX-MNC; (4) – DOX-MNC + CMF + EMF; T = 77 K.
Fig. 12
Fig. 12. Redox state in Walker-256 carcinosarcoma 18 days after implantation: *significant difference from control, p < 0.05; &significant difference from DOX, p < 0.05; §significant difference from DOX-MNC, p < 0.05; #significant difference from DOX-MNC + CMF + EMF, p < 0.05.

Similar articles

References

    1. Gobbo O. L. Sjaastad K. Radomski M. W. Volkov Y. Prina-Mello A. Magnetic nanoparticles in cancer theranostics. Theranostics. 2015;5:1249–1263. doi: 10.7150/thno.11544. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gorobets S. V. Gorobets O. Yu. Kovalova S. O. Bioinformatic analysis of the genetic mechanism of biomineralization of biogenic magnetic nanoparticles in bacteria capable of tumor-specific accumulation. Innovative Biosyst. Bioeng. 2022;6:48–55. doi: 10.20535/ibb.2022.6.2.260183. - DOI
    1. Dadfar S. M. Roemhild K. Drude N. I. Von Stillfried S. Knüchel R. Kiessling F. Lammers T. Iron oxide nanoparticles: Diagnostic, therapeutic and theranostic applications. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2019;138:302–325. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2019.01.005. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Soetaert F. Korangath P. Serantes D. Fiering S. Ivkov R. Cancer therapy with iron oxide nanoparticles: Agents of thermal and immune therapies. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2020;163–164:65–83. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2020.06.025. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gan W. W. Chan L. W. Li W. Wong T. W. Critical clinical gaps in cancer precision nanomedicine development. J. Controlled Release. 2022;345:811–818. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.03.055. - DOI - PubMed