Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 24;115(2):e2024012.
doi: 10.23749/mdl.v115i2.15609.

Exposure Assessment and Monitoring of Antiblastic Drugs Preparation in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review

Affiliations

Exposure Assessment and Monitoring of Antiblastic Drugs Preparation in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review

Francesca Borghi et al. Med Lav. .

Abstract

Several antiblastic drugs (ADs) are classified as carcinogenic, mutagenic, and/or toxic for reproduction. Despite established guidelines and safe handling technologies, ADs contamination of the work environments could occur in healthcare settings, leading to potential exposure of healthcare staff. This systematic review aims to investigate the main techniques and practices for assessing ADs occupational exposure in healthcare settings. The reviewed studies unveil that workplace contamination by ADs appears to be a still-topical problem in healthcare settings. These issues are linked to difficulties in guaranteeing: (i) the adherence to standardized protocols when dealing with ADs, (ii) the effective use of personal protective equipment by operators involved in the administration or management of ADs, (iii) a comprehensive training of the healthcare personnel, and (iv) a thorough health surveillance of exposed workers. A "multi-parametric" approach emerges as a desirable strategy for exposure assessment. In parallel, exposure assessment should coincide with the introduction of novel technologies aimed at minimizing exposure (i.e., risk management). Assessment must consider various departments and health operators susceptible to ADs contamination, with a focus extended beyond worst-case scenarios, also considering activities like surface cleaning and logistical tasks related to ADs management. A comprehensive approach in ADs risk assessment enables the evaluation of distinct substance behaviors and subsequent exposure routes, affording a more holistic understanding of potential risks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flowchart of the literature research.

References

    1. Jana S, Chakraborty D. Chemical Risk in Hospitals: An Overview of Monitoring Strategies and International Regulatory Practical Concerns. International Journal of Innovative Research in Engineering. 2023:562–70.
    1. European Commission. Second Edition. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2023. Guidance for the safe management of hazardous medicinal products at work.
    1. Bernabeu-Martínez MÁ, Sánchez-Tormo J, García-Salom P, Sanz-Valero J, Wanden-Berghe C. Perception of risk of exposure in the management of hazardous drugs in home hospitalization and hospital units. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0253909. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mahboob M, Rahman MF, Rekhadevi P V, et al. Monitoring of oxidative stress in nurses occupationally exposed to antineoplastic drugs. Toxicol Int. 2012;19:20–4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Asefa S, Aga F, Dinegde NG, Demie TG. Knowledge and Practices on the Safe Handling of Cytotoxic Drugs Among Oncology Nurses Working at Tertiary Teaching Hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2021;13:71–80. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types