Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 4;12(6):e0431223.
doi: 10.1128/spectrum.04312-23. Epub 2024 Apr 30.

Genome sequence-based species classification of Enterobacter cloacae complex: a study among clinical isolates

Affiliations

Genome sequence-based species classification of Enterobacter cloacae complex: a study among clinical isolates

Xuemei Qiu et al. Microbiol Spectr. .

Abstract

Accurate species-level identification of Enterobacter cloacae complex (ECC) is crucial for related research. The classification of ECC is based on strain-to-strain phylogenetic congruence, as well as genomic features including average nucleotide identity (ANI) and digitalized DNA-DNA hybridization (dDDH). ANI and dDDH derived from whole-genome sequencing have emerged as a reliable metric for assessing genetic relatedness between genomes and are increasingly recognized as a standard for species delimitation. Up to now, there are two different classification methods for ECC. The first one categorizes E. hormaechei, a species within ECC, into five subspecies (E. hormaechei subsp. steigerwaltii, subsp. oharae, subsp. xiangfangensis, subsp. hoffmannii, and subsp. hormaechei). The second classifies E. hormaechei as three species: E. hormaechei, "E. xiangfangensis," "E. hoffmanii." While the former is well-accepted in the academic area, the latter may have a greater ability to distinguish different species of ECC. To assess the suitability of these identification criteria for clinical ECC isolates, we conducted a comprehensive analysis involving phylogenetic analysis, ANI and dDDH value alignment, virulence gene identification, and capsule typing on 256 clinical ECC strains isolated from the bloodstream. Our findings indicated that the method of categorizing E. hormaechei into five subspecies has better correlation and consistency with the molecular characteristics of clinical ECC isolates, as evidenced by phylogenetic analysis, virulence genes, and capsule typing. Therefore, the subspecies-based classification method appears more suitable for taxonomic assignments of clinical ECC isolates.

Importance: Standardizing taxonomy of the Enterobacter cloacae complex (ECC) is necessary for data integration across diverse studies. The study utilized whole-genome data to accurately identify 256 clinical ECC isolated from bloodstream infections using average nucleotide identity (ANI), digitalized DNA-DNA hybridization (dDDH), and phylogenetic analysis. Through comprehensive assessments including phylogenetic analysis, ANI and dDDH comparisons, virulence gene, and capsule typing of the 256 clinical isolates, it was concluded that the classification method based on subspecies exhibited better correlation and consistency with the molecular characteristics of clinical ECC isolates. In summary, this research contributes to the precise identification of clinical ECC at the species level and expands our understanding of ECC.

Keywords: DNA-DNA hybridization; Enterobacter cloacae complex; average nucleotide identity; whole-genome sequencing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Species identification, STs, capsule typing, and virulence genes detection of E. hormaechei. The species/subspecies and clades are drawn in concentric circles. ST, multi-locus sequence typing. New STs identified in this study are indicated in red font. NL, capsule typing of Enterobacter. Black and white squares represent the presence and absence of siderophores-related genes, respectively. The genomic distance has shown based on SNPs.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mezzatesta ML, Gona F, Stefani S. 2012. Enterobacter cloacae complex: clinical impact and emerging antibiotic resistance. Future Microbiol 7:887–902. doi:10.2217/fmb.12.61 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Annavajhala MK, Gomez-Simmonds A, Uhlemann AC. 2019. Multidrug-resistant Enterobacter cloacae complex emerging as a global, diversifying threat. Front Microbiol 10:44. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.00044 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Xu T, Xue CX, Huang J, Wu J, Chen R, Zhou K. 2022. Emergence of an epidemic hypervirulent clone of Enterobacter hormaechei coproducing mcr-9 and carbapenemases. Lancet Microbe 3:e474–e475. doi:10.1016/S2666-5247(22)00122-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Georgiades K, Raoult D. 2010. Defining pathogenic bacterial species in the genomic era. Front Microbiol 1:151. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2010.00151 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P, Tiedje JM. 2007. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57:81–91. doi:10.1099/ijs.0.64483-0 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources