Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Apr 30;19(4):e0302046.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302046. eCollection 2024.

Predictive value of the Ranson and BISAP scoring systems for the severity and prognosis of acute pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Predictive value of the Ranson and BISAP scoring systems for the severity and prognosis of acute pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Jianpeng Zhu et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: To systematically assess and compare the predictive value of the Ranson and Bedside Index of Severity in Acute Pancreatitis (BISAP) scoring systems for the severity and prognosis of acute pancreatitis (AP).

Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were systematically searched until February 15, 2023. Outcomes in this analysis included severity and prognosis [mortality, organ failure, pancreatic necrosis, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission]. The revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool was used to evaluate the quality of diagnostic accuracy studies. The threshold effect was evaluated for each outcome. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve (AUC) as well as 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. The DeLong test was used for AUC comparisons. For the outcome evaluated by over 9 studies, publication bias was assessed using the Deeks' funnel plot asymmetry test.

Results: Totally 17 studies of 5476 AP patients were included. For severity, the pooled sensitivity of the Ranson and BISAP was 0.95 (95%CI: 0.87, 0.98) and 0.67 (95%CI: 0.27, 0.92); the pooled specificity of the Ranson and BISAP was 0.74 (0.52, 0.88) and 0.95 (95%CI: 0.85, 0.98); the pooled AUC of the Ranson and BISAP was 0.95 (95%CI: 0.93, 0.97) and 0.94 (95%CI: 0.92, 0.96) (P = 0.480). For mortality, the pooled sensitivity of the Ranson and BISAP was 0.89 (95%CI: 0.73, 0.96) and 0.77 (95%CI: 0.58, 0.89); the pooled specificity of the Ranson and BISAP was 0.79 (95%CI: 0.68, 0.87) and 0.90 (95%CI: 0.86, 0.93); the pooled AUC of the Ranson and BISAP was 0.91 (95%CI: 0.88, 0.93) and 0.92 (95%CI: 0.90, 0.94) (P = 0.480). For organ failure, the pooled sensitivity of the Ranson and BISAP was 0.84 (95%CI: 0.76, 0.90) and 0.78 (95%CI: 0.60, 0.90); the pooled specificity of the Ranson and BISAP was 0.84 (95%CI: 0.63, 0.94) and 0.90 (95%CI: 0.72, 0.97); the pooled AUC of the Ranson and BISAP was 0.86 (95%CI: 0.82, 0.88) and 0.90 (95%CI: 0.87, 0.93) (P = 0.110). For pancreatic necrosis, the pooled sensitivity of the Ranson and BISAP was 0.63 (95%CI: 0.35, 0.84) and 0.63 (95%CI: 0.23, 0.90); the pooled specificity of the Ranson and BISAP was 0.90 (95%CI: 0.77, 0.96) and 0.93 (95%CI: 0.89, 0.96); the pooled AUC of the Ranson and BISAP was 0.87 (95%CI: 0.84, 0.90) and 0.93 (95%CI: 0.91, 0.95) (P = 0.001). For ICU admission, the pooled sensitivity of the Ranson and BISAP was 0.86 (95%CI: 0.77, 0.92) and 0.63 (95%CI: 0.52, 0.73); the pooled specificity of the Ranson and BISAP was 0.58 (95%CI: 0.55, 0.61) and 0.84 (95%CI: 0.81, 0.86); the pooled AUC of the Ranson and BISAP was 0.92 (95%CI: 0.81, 1.00) and 0.86 (95%CI: 0.67, 1.00) (P = 0.592).

Conclusion: The Ranson score was an applicable tool for predicting severity and prognosis of AP patients with reliable diagnostic accuracy in resource and time-limited settings. Future large-scale studies are needed to verify the findings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Selection process of qualified studies.
Fig 2
Fig 2. SROC curve of the (a) Ranson and (b) BISAP for predicting severity in AP.
SROC, Summary receiver operating characteristic; BISAP, Bedside Index of Severity in Acute Pancreatitis; AP, acute pancreatitis.
Fig 3
Fig 3. SROC curve of the (a) Ranson and (b) BISAP for predicting mortality in AP.
SROC, Summary receiver operating characteristic; BISAP, Bedside Index of Severity in Acute Pancreatitis; AP, acute pancreatitis.
Fig 4
Fig 4. SROC curve of the (a) Ranson and (b) BISAP for predicting organ failure in AP.
SROC, Summary receiver operating characteristic; BISAP, Bedside Index of Severity in Acute Pancreatitis; AP, acute pancreatitis.
Fig 5
Fig 5. SROC curve of the (a) Ranson and (b) BISAP for predicting pancreatic necrosis in AP.
SROC, Summary receiver operating characteristic; BISAP, Bedside Index of Severity in Acute Pancreatitis; AP, acute pancreatitis.
Fig 6
Fig 6. SROC curve of the (a) Ranson and (b) BISAP for predicting ICU admission in AP.
SROC, Summary receiver operating characteristic; BISAP, Bedside Index of Severity in Acute Pancreatitis; ICU, intensive care unit; AP, acute pancreatitis.

References

    1. van Dijk SM, Hallensleben NDL, van Santvoort HC, Fockens P, van Goor H, Bruno MJ, et al.. Acute pancreatitis: recent advances through randomised trials. Gut. 2017;66(11):2024–32. Epub 2017/08/26. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313595 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee PJ, Papachristou GI. New insights into acute pancreatitis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;16(8):479–96. Epub 2019/05/30. doi: 10.1038/s41575-019-0158-2 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gardner TB. Acute Pancreatitis. Ann Intern Med. 2021;174(2):Itc17–itc32. Epub 2021/02/09. doi: 10.7326/AITC202102160 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mederos MA, Reber HA, Girgis MD. Acute Pancreatitis: A Review. Jama. 2021;325(4):382–90. Epub 2021/01/27. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.20317 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, Gooszen HG, Johnson CD, Sarr MG, et al.. Classification of acute pancreatitis—2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut. 2013;62(1):102–11. Epub 2012/10/27. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779 . - DOI - PubMed

Publication types