Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 1;13(5):201-213.
doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.135.BJR-2023-0281.R1.

Prognostic factors associated with failure of total elbow arthroplasty

Zaid Hamoodi  1   2 , Celina K Gehringer  1 , Lucy M Bull  3 , Tom Hughes  4   5 , Lianne Kearsley-Fleet  1 , Jamie C Sergeant  1   6 , Adam C Watts  2
Affiliations

Prognostic factors associated with failure of total elbow arthroplasty

Zaid Hamoodi et al. Bone Joint Res. .

Abstract

Aims: The aims of this study were to identify and evaluate the current literature examining the prognostic factors which are associated with failure of total elbow arthroplasty (TEA).

Methods: Electronic literature searches were conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane. All studies reporting prognostic estimates for factors associated with the revision of a primary TEA were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the Quality In Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool, and the quality of evidence was assessed using the modified Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) framework. Due to low quality of the evidence and the heterogeneous nature of the studies, a narrative synthesis was used.

Results: A total of 19 studies met the inclusion criteria, investigating 28 possible prognostic factors. Most QUIPS domains (84%) were rated as moderate to high risk of bias. The quality of the evidence was low or very low for all prognostic factors. In low-quality evidence, prognostic factors with consistent associations with failure of TEA in more than one study were: the sequelae of trauma leading to TEA, either independently or combined with acute trauma, and male sex. Several other studies investigating sex reported no association. The evidence for other factors was of very low quality and mostly involved exploratory studies.

Conclusion: The current evidence investigating the prognostic factors associated with failure of TEA is of low or very low quality, and studies generally have a moderate to high risk of bias. Prognostic factors are subject to uncertainty, should be interpreted with caution, and are of little clinical value. Higher-quality evidence is required to determine robust prognostic factors for failure of TEA.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Z. Hamoodi reports a grant for a joint research fellowship in which this study was undertaken, from the National Joint Registry and The Royal College of Surgeons of England, as well as a grant from the John Charnley Trust. Z. Hamoodi and J. C. Sergeant report that this study was supported by the Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis (grant 21755). A. C. Watts has a consultancy agreement with Stryker Ltd, as well as grants or contracts from NIHR and TRB Chemedica, consulting fees from Medartis, and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Stryker and Arthrex, all of which are unrelated to this study. A. C. Watts is also Secretary Elect of the British Elbow and Shoulder Society, a board member of The Bone & Joint Journal, and editorial committee member of the National Joint Registry. The remaining authors have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flowchart outlining the selection of studies.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Assessment of the risk of bias.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The association between the diagnoses of trauma sequelae (compared to inflammatory arthritis) and total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) failure requiring revision. The overall effect estimate is not reported due to low quality of the evidence and the heterogeneous nature of the studies. CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; IA, inflammatory arthritis; RR, risk ratio; TS, trauma sequelae.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The association between male sex and failure of total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) requiring revision in multivariable analyses. The overall effect estimate is not reported due to low quality of the evidence and the heterogeneous nature of the studies. CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; OR, odds ratio; RR, risk ratio.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Macken AA, Prkic A, Kodde IF, Lans J, Chen NC, Eygendaal D. Global trends in indications for total elbow arthroplasty: a systematic review of national registries. EFORT Open Rev. 2020;5(4):215–220. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190036. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Evans JP, Evans JT, Mohammad HR, et al. How long does an elbow replacement last? A systematic review and meta-analysis of case-series and national registry reports with more than 10 years of follow-up. Acta Orthop. 2022;93:495–502. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2022.2753. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Krenek L, Farng E, Zingmond D, SooHoo NF. Complication and revision rates following total elbow arthroplasty. J Hand Surg Am. 2011;36(1):68–73. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.09.036. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Little CP, Graham AJ, Carr AJ. Total elbow arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature in the English language until the end of 2003. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87-B(4):437–444. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B4.15692. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Welsink CL, Lambers KTA, van Deurzen DFP, Eygendaal D, van den Bekerom MPJ. Total elbow arthroplasty: a systematic review. JBJS Rev. 2017;5(7):e4. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.16.00089. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types