Physician engagement in reproductive health advocacy: findings from a mixed methods evaluation of a leadership and advocacy program
- PMID: 38689263
- PMCID: PMC11061897
- DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-05410-5
Physician engagement in reproductive health advocacy: findings from a mixed methods evaluation of a leadership and advocacy program
Abstract
Background: Medical curricula include advocacy competencies, but how much physicians engage in advocacy and what enables this engagement is not well characterized. The authors assessed facilitators and barriers to advocacy identified by physician alumni of a reproductive health advocacy training program.
Methods: The authors present secondary results from a mixed methods program evaluation from 2018 to 2020, using alumni data from a cross-sectional survey (n = 231) and in-depth interviews (IDIs, n = 36). The survey measured engagement in policy, media, professional organization, and medical education advocacy and the value placed on the community fostered by the program (eight questions, Cronbach's alpha = 0.81). The authors estimated the association of community value score with advocacy engagement using multivariable Poisson regression to estimate prevalence ratios and analyzed IDI data inductively.
Results: Over one third of alumni were highly engaged in legislative policy (n = 90, 39%), professional organizations (n = 98, 42%), or medical education (n = 89, 39%), with fewer highly active in media-based advocacy (n = 54, 23%) in the year prior to the survey. Survey and IDI data demonstrated that passion, sense of urgency, confidence in skills, and the program's emphasis on different forms of advocacy facilitated engagement in advocacy, while insufficient time, safety concerns, and sense of effort redundancies were barriers. The program community was also an important facilitator, especially for "out loud" efforts and for those working in environments perceived as hostile to abortion care (e.g., alumni in hostile environments with high community value scores were 1.8 times [95% CI 1.3, 2.6] as likely to report medium/high levels of media advocacy compared to those with low scores after adjusting for age, gender, and clinical specialty).
Conclusion: Physician advocacy training curricula should include both skills- and community-building and identify a full range of forms of advocacy. Community-building is especially important for physician advocacy for reproductive health services such as abortion care.
Keywords: Abortion; Advocacy; Physician training; Reproductive health.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Physician perspectives of abortion advocacy: findings from a mixed-methods study.BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2023 Jan;49(1):7-11. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2021-201394. Epub 2022 Apr 8. BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2023. PMID: 35396323 Free PMC article.
-
The use of social media for reproductive health advocacy among physicians: a content analysis of tweets by physicians engaged in reproductive health care.J Commun Healthc. 2024 Oct;17(3):285-291. doi: 10.1080/17538068.2024.2360825. Epub 2024 Jun 10. J Commun Healthc. 2024. PMID: 38856660
-
Postgraduate Experiences With an Advanced Reproductive Health and Abortion Training and Leadership Program.Fam Med. 2017 Oct;49(9):706-713. Fam Med. 2017. PMID: 29045988
-
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun. Campbell Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38873396 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Engaging Leadership Competencies Through Population Health Policy Advocacy: A Review of the Evidence.Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2022 Nov;23(4):259-271. doi: 10.1177/15271544221112893. Epub 2022 Jul 18. Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2022. PMID: 35844157 Review.
Cited by
-
Is the Future Green? Assessing Environmental Health Confidence in Internal Medicine Residents.J Grad Med Educ. 2024 Dec;16(6 Suppl):99-103. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-24-00081.1. Epub 2024 Dec 13. J Grad Med Educ. 2024. PMID: 39677903 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Edcuation. ACGME Common Program Requirements (Residency). Common Program Requirements. Published July 1, 2022. Accessed January 11. 2023. https://www.acgme.org/globalassets/pfassets/programrequirements/cprresid....
-
- 19-60455 - Jackson Women’s Health Orgn, et Al v. Thomas Dobbs, et Al.(United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 2020). https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-ca5-19-60455/USCOURTS-ca5-1....
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources