Towards ICD 10: the attitudes of Australian and New Zealand psychiatrists
- PMID: 3869008
- DOI: 10.1080/00048678509158850
Towards ICD 10: the attitudes of Australian and New Zealand psychiatrists
Abstract
About 15% of practising psychiatrists in Australia and New Zealand responded to a brief postal questionnaire. This sample appears reasonably representative of the various groups within the profession and of the geographical distribution of the clinicians. Ninety-one per cent of the respondents thought it was important to have a reliable classification; 83% thought that ICD 10 should incorporate specific diagnostic criteria; and 78% were of the view that ICD 10 should have a multiaxial system. Overall, DSM-III is used twice as often as ICD 9, and only 12% of psychiatrists do not use DSM-III at all. A very small minority (6%) use some other classification system. The results of this survey are discussed against the background of the intended introduction of ICD 10 in about 1990. Preliminary preparations for it are already in progress.
Similar articles
-
New Zealand psychiatrists views on global features of ICD-10 and DSM-IV.Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2007 Feb;41(2):157-65. doi: 10.1080/00048670601109931. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2007. PMID: 17464694
-
[Toward the new classification of mental disorders--Polish psychiatrists' opinions about project of ICD-11].Psychiatr Pol. 2011 Nov-Dec;45(6):785-98. Psychiatr Pol. 2011. PMID: 22335123 Polish.
-
International surveys on the use of ICD-10 and related diagnostic systems.Psychopathology. 2002 Mar-Jun;35(2-3):72-5. doi: 10.1159/000065122. Psychopathology. 2002. PMID: 12145487
-
[The importance of classifications in psychiatry].Encephale. 1995 Dec;21 Spec No 5:3-7. Encephale. 1995. PMID: 8582303 Review. French.
-
[Classification of mental disorders--a conceptual framework for the ICD-11].Psychiatr Pol. 2011 Nov-Dec;45(6):941-50. Psychiatr Pol. 2011. PMID: 22335136 Review. Polish.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical