Intensive care utilisation after elective surgery in Australia and New Zealand: A point prevalence study
- PMID: 38690185
- PMCID: PMC11056426
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ccrj.2023.10.010
Intensive care utilisation after elective surgery in Australia and New Zealand: A point prevalence study
Abstract
Objective: We aimed to describe the characteristics, outcomes and resource utilisation of patients being cared for in an ICU after undergoing elective surgery in Australia and New Zealand (ANZ).
Methods: This was a point prevalence study involving 51 adult ICUs in ANZ in June 2021. Patients met inclusion criteria if they were being treated in a participating ICU on he study dates. Patients were categorised according to whether they had undergone elective surgery, admitted directly from theatre or unplanned from the ward. Descriptive and comparative analysis was performed according to the source of ICU admission. Resource utilisation was measured by Length of stay, organ support and occupied bed days.
Results: 712 patients met inclusion criteria, with 172 (24%) have undergone elective surgery. Of these, 136 (19%) were admitted directly to the ICU and 36 (5.1%) were an unplanned admission from the ward. Elective surgical patients occupied 15.8% of the total ICU patient bed days, of which 44.3% were following unplanned admissions. Elective surgical patients who were an unplanned admission from the ward, compared to those admitted directly from theatre, had a higher severity of illness (AP2 17 vs 13, p<0.01), require respiratory or vasopressor support (75% vs 44%, p<0.01) and hospital mortality (16.7% vs 2.2%, p < 0.01).
Conclusions: ICU resource utilisation of patients who have undergone elective surgery is substantial. Those patients admitted directly from theatre have good outcomes and low resource utilisation. Patient admitted unplanned from the ward, although fewer, were sicker, more resource intensive and had significantly worse outcomes.
Keywords: Critical care; Failure to rescue; Intensive Care Medicine; Post operative intensive care; Resource utilisation.
Crown Copyright © 2023 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of College of Intensive Care Medicine of Australia and New Zealand.
Figures
References
-
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare . 2016. Admitted patient care 2014-2015.
-
- Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society. ANZICS Centre for outcome and resource evaluation and Monash University SPRINT-SARI Australia combined report on COVID-19 admissions to Australian and New Zealand ICUs. [Melbourne].
-
- Gillies M.A., Sander M., Shaw A., Wijeysundera D.N., Myburgh J., Aldecoa C., et al. Current research priorities in perioperative intensive care medicine [Internet] Intensive Care Med. Springer Verlag. 2017 [cited 2020 Sep 21];43:1173–1186. www.isrctn.com Available from: - PubMed
-
- Kahan B.C., Koulenti D., Arvaniti K., Beavis V., Campbell D., Chan M., et al. Critical care admission following elective surgery was not associated with survival benefit: prospective analysis of data from 27 countries. Intensive Care Med. 2017 Jul 1;43(7):971–979. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
