Assessing the utility of osteoporosis self-assessment tool for Asians in patients undergoing hip surgery
- PMID: 38690542
- PMCID: PMC11056419
- DOI: 10.1016/j.afos.2024.01.003
Assessing the utility of osteoporosis self-assessment tool for Asians in patients undergoing hip surgery
Abstract
Objectives: Diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis are instrumental in obtaining good outcomes of hip surgery. Measuring bone mineral density (BMD) using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the gold standard for diagnosing osteoporosis. However, due to limited access to DXA, there is a need for a screening tool to identify patients at a higher risk of osteoporosis. We analyzed the potential utility of the Osteoporosis Self-assessment Tool for Asians (OSTA) as a screening tool for osteoporosis.
Methods: A total of 1378 female patients who underwent hip surgery at 8 institutions were analyzed. For each patient, the BMD of the proximal femoral region was measured by DXA (DXA-BMD), and the correlation with OSTA score (as a continuous variable) was assessed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to assess the ability of OSTA score to predict osteoporosis. Lastly, the OSTA score was truncated to yield an integer (OSTA index) to clarify the percentage of patients with osteoporosis for each index.
Results: DXA-BMD showed a strong correlation with OSTA (r = 0.683; P < 0.001). On ROC curve analysis, the optimal OSTA score cut-off value of -5.4 was associated with 73.8% sensitivity and 80.9% specificity for diagnosis of osteoporosis (area under the curve: 0.842). A decrease in the OSTA index by 1 unit was associated with a 7.3% increase in the probability of osteoporosis.
Conclusions: OSTA is a potentially useful tool for screening osteoporosis in patients undergoing hip surgery. Our findings may help identify high-risk patients who require further investigation using DXA.
Keywords: Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; Hip surgery; Osteopenia; Osteosarcopenia; Screening.
© 2024 The Korean Society of Osteoporosis. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Yoshimura N., Muraki S., Oka H., Mabuchi A., En-Yo Y., Yoshida M., et al. Prevalence of knee osteoarthritis, lumbar spondylosis, and osteoporosis in Japanese men and women: the research on osteoarthritis/osteoporosis against disability study. J Bone Miner Metabol. 2009;27:620–628. - PubMed
-
- Soen S., Fukunaga M., Sugimoto T., Sone T., Fujiwara S., Endo N., et al. Diagnostic criteria for primary osteoporosis: year 2012 revision. J Bone Miner Metabol. 2013;31:247–257. - PubMed
-
- Kanis J.A., Cooper C., Rizzoli R., Reginster J.Y. On behalf of the scientific advisory board of the European society for clinical and economic aspects of osteoporosis (ESCEO) and the committees of scientific advisors and national Societies of the international osteoporosis foundation (IOF). European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int. 2019;30:3–44. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Cadarette S.M., Jaglal S.B., Murray T.M. Validation of the simple calculated osteoporosis risk estimation (SCORE) for patient selection for bone densitometry. Osteoporos Int. 1999;10:85–90. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
