Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jul;35(7):1363-1373.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05783-7. Epub 2024 May 1.

Vaginal Hysterectomy and Pelvic Organ Prolapse: History and Recent Developments

Renaud de Tayrac  1 , Michel Cosson  2
Affiliations
Review

Vaginal Hysterectomy and Pelvic Organ Prolapse: History and Recent Developments

Renaud de Tayrac et al. Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Jul.

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: Vaginal hysterectomy (VH) was described as far back as 120 CE. However, it was not till the mid-1900s when reconstructive procedures were introduced to mitigate the risk of, or treat, pelvic organ prolapse in relation to VH. Furthermore, routine hysterectomy, particularly VH, has long been advocated in prolapse surgery. However, this indication is now questionable.

Methods: Literature review to provide an overview of current evidence and experts' opinion regarding the relationship between VH and pelvic organ prolapse. The review presents a historical perspective on the role of VH in the management of pelvic organ prolapse, the current debate on the usefulness of the procedure in this context, a practical guide on operative techniques used during VH and the impact of recent surgical developments on its use.

Results: Vaginal hysterectomy is a well-established technique that is still superior to laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign gynecological disease, although more surgically challenging. However, it is possible that some contemporary techniques, such as vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery, may overcome some of these challenges, and hence increase the number of hysterectomies performed via the vaginal route. Although patients should be counselled about uterine-sparing reconstructive surgery, vaginal hysterectomy continues to be a major surgical procedure in reconstructive pelvic floor surgery.

Conclusions: Therefore, it is prudent to continue to train residents in vaginal surgical skills to ensure that they continue to provide safe, cost-effective, and comprehensive patient care.

Keywords: Oophorectomy; Pelvic organ prolapse; Pelvic reconstructive surgery; Salpingectomy; Vaginal hysterectomy; vNOTES.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Sutton C. Hysterectomy: a historical perspective. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;11(1):1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3552(97)80047-8 . - DOI
    1. Marquini GV, de Oliveira LM, Martins SB, et al. Historical perspective of vaginal hysterectomy: the resilience of art and evidence-based medicine in the age of technology. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022;307:1377–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06607-z . - DOI - PubMed
    1. McCall ML. Posterior culdeplasty: surgical correction of enterocele during vaginal hysterectomy; a preliminary report. Obstet Gynecol 1957;10(6):595–602. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006250-195712000-00001 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Richter K. The surgical treatment of the prolapsed vaginal fundus after uterine extirpation. A contribution on Amreich’s the sacrotuberal vaginal fixation. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1967;27:941–54. - PubMed
    1. Randall CL, Nichols DH. Surgical treatment of vaginal inversion. Obstet Gynecol. 1971;38:327–32. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources