Status of the midwifery workforce and childbirth services and the impact of midwife staffing on birth outcomes in China: a multicentre cross-sectional study
- PMID: 38692722
- PMCID: PMC11086407
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082527
Status of the midwifery workforce and childbirth services and the impact of midwife staffing on birth outcomes in China: a multicentre cross-sectional study
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the status of the midwifery workforce and childbirth services in China and to identify the association between midwife staffing and childbirth outcomes.
Design: A descriptive, multicentre cross-sectional survey.
Setting: Maternity hospitals from the eastern, central and western regions of China.
Participants: Stratified sampling of maternity hospitals between 1 July and 31 December 2021.The sample hospitals received a package of questionnaires, and the head midwives from the participating hospitals were invited to fill in the questionnaires.
Results: A total of 180 hospitals were selected and investigated, staffed with 4159 midwives, 412 obstetric nurses and 1007 obstetricians at the labour and delivery units. The average efficiency index of annual midwifery services was 272 deliveries per midwife. In the sample hospitals, 44.9% of women had a caesarean delivery and 21.4% had an episiotomy. Improved midwife staffing was associated with reduced rates of instrumental vaginal delivery (adjusted β -0.032, 95% CI -0.115 to -0.012, p<0.05) and episiotomy (adjusted β -0.171, 95% CI -0.190 to -0.056, p<0.001).
Conclusion: The rates of childbirth interventions including the overall caesarean section in China and the episiotomy rate, especially in the central region, remain relatively high. Improved midwife staffing was associated with reduced rates of instrumental vaginal delivery and episiotomy, indicating that further investments in the midwifery workforce could produce better childbirth outcomes.
Keywords: Health Services; Health Workforce; Nursing Care.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Similar articles
-
Assessment of the implementation of the model of integrated and humanised midwifery health services in Chile.Midwifery. 2016 Apr;35:53-61. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.01.018. Epub 2016 Feb 8. Midwifery. 2016. PMID: 27060401
-
Effect of planned place of birth on obstetric interventions and maternal outcomes among low-risk women: a cohort study in the Netherlands.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Oct 28;16(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1130-6. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016. PMID: 27793112 Free PMC article.
-
Midwife-led care and obstetrician-led care for low-risk pregnancies: A cost comparison.Birth. 2020 Mar;47(1):57-66. doi: 10.1111/birt.12464. Epub 2019 Nov 3. Birth. 2020. PMID: 31680337
-
Midwifery and nurse staffing of inpatient maternity services - A systematic scoping review of associations with outcomes and quality of care.Midwifery. 2021 Dec;103:103118. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2021.103118. Epub 2021 Aug 14. Midwifery. 2021. PMID: 34428733
-
Birth outcomes for women planning Vaginal Birth after Caesarean (VBAC) in midwifery led settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Midwifery. 2024 Dec;139:104168. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2024.104168. Epub 2024 Aug 31. Midwifery. 2024. PMID: 39243594
References
-
- Guilbert J-J. The world health report 2006: working together for health. In: Education for health: change in learning & practice. 19. 2006: 385–7. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical