Measuring the effectiveness of online search ads on blood donor recruitment and donation
- PMID: 38693096
- DOI: 10.1111/trf.17850
Measuring the effectiveness of online search ads on blood donor recruitment and donation
Abstract
Background: Acutely highlighted during the COVID-19 pandemic, the tenuousness of the blood supply continues to be a lynchpin of the most important medical procedures. Online advertisements have become a mainstay in donor recruitment. We set out to determine the effectiveness of online search ads and variations thereof on blood donations with an emphasis on first-time donors.
Study design and methods: From September 01, 2022 through March 31, 2023, we performed a campaign comparison experiment through a major search-ads platform with two distinct messages: one altruistic ("Altruistic") and one with a prospect of rewards ("Promotion"). We developed a method to track donation outcomes and associated them with impressions, click-throughs, and conversions. We compared the performance of the Altruistic and Promotion arms to a control group that was not associated with any search-ads ("Baseline").
Results: Analyzing 34,157 donations during the study period, the Promotion group, and not Altruistic, had a significant difference of first-time donors over Baseline (24% vs. 12%, p = 7e-6). We analyzed 49,305 appointments and discovered that appointments made from the Altruistic arm resulted in a significantly higher percentage of donations when compared to Baseline (57% vs. 53%, p = .009); however, the Promotion group had a higher percentage of donations from first-time donors when compared to Baseline (12% vs. 8%, p = .006).
Conclusion: We developed a method for determining the effectiveness of online search ads on donation outcomes. Rewards/promotions messaging was most effective at recruiting first-time donors. Our methodology is generalizable to different blood centers to explore messaging effectiveness among their unique communities.
Keywords: administration; blood center operations; donors.
© 2024 AABB.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Jones JM, Sapiano MRP, Savinkina AA, Haass KA, Baker ML, Henry RA, et al. Slowing decline in blood collection and transfusion in the United States – 2017. Transfusion. 2020;60(Suppl 2):S1–S9. https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.15604
-
- Pandey S, Belanger GA, Rajbhandary S, Cohn CS, Benjamin RJ, Bracey AW, et al. A survey of US hospitals on platelet inventory management, transfusion practice, and platelet availability. Transfusion. 2021;61(9):2611–2620. https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.16561
-
- Ngo A, Masel D, Cahill C, Blumberg N, Refaai MA. Blood banking and transfusion medicine challenges during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Clin Lab Med. 2020;40(4):587–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cll.2020.08.013
-
- Gehrie EA, Frank SM, Goobie SM. Balancing supply and demand for blood during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Anesthesiology. 2020;133(1):16–18. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000003341
-
- American Red Cross. Red Cross Declares First‐ever Blood Crisis amid Omicron Surge. American Red Cross Web Page. Accessed on January, 2022. https://www.redcross.org/about‐us/news‐and‐events/press‐release/2022/blo...
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
