Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2024 Jun;54(7):1137-1143.
doi: 10.1007/s00247-024-05936-2. Epub 2024 May 2.

Percutaneous cecostomy: 25-year two institution experience

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Percutaneous cecostomy: 25-year two institution experience

Charles A James et al. Pediatr Radiol. 2024 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Reports of technical success, adverse events, and long-term outcome of percutaneous cecostomy in children are limited.

Objective: To characterize technical success, 30-day severe adverse events, and long-term outcome of percutaneous cecostomy at two centers.

Materials and methods: A retrospective review of hospital course and long-term follow-up (through May 2022) of percutaneous cecostomy tubes placed May 1997 to August 2011 at two children's hospitals was used. Outcomes assessed included technical success (defined as successful tube placement into the colon allowing antegrade colonic enemas), length of stay, 30-day severe adverse events, surgery consults, surgical repair, VP shunt infection, ongoing flushes, tube removal, duration between maintenance tube exchanges, and deaths.

Results: A total of 215 procedures were performed in 208 patients (90 institution A, 125 institution B). Tubes were placed for neurogenic bowel (72.1%, n = 155) and functional constipation (27.9%, n = 60). Technical success was 98.1% (211/215) and did not differ between centers (p = 0.74). Surgical repair was required for bowel leakage in 5.1% (11/215) and VP shunt infection was managed in 2.1% (2/95). Compared to functional constipation, patients with neurogenic bowel had higher % tube remaining (65.3% [96/147] versus 25.9% [15/58], p < 0.001) and higher ongoing flushes at follow-up (42.2% [62/147] versus 12.1% [7/58], p < 0.001). Tube removal for dissatisfaction occurred in 15.6% [32/205] and did not differ between groups (p = 0.98). Eight deaths due to co-morbidity occurred after a median of 7.4 years (IQR 9.3) of tube access.

Conclusion: Percutaneous cecostomy is technically successful in the vast majority of patients and provided durable access in most. Bowel leakage and VP shunt infection are uncommon, severe adverse events.

Keywords: Constipation; Fecal incontinence; Pediatric interventional radiology; Percutaneous cecostomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Shandling B, Chait PG, Richards HF (1996) Percutaneous cecostomy: a new technique in the management of fecal incontinence. J Pediatr Surg 31:534–537 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chait PG, Shandling B, Richards HM, Connolly BL (1997) Fecal incontinence in children: treatment with percutaneous cecostomy tube placement–a prospective study. Radiology 203:621–624 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sierre S, Lipsich J, Questa H, et al (2007) Percutaneous cecostomy for management of fecal incontinence in pediatric patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol 18:982–985 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Khan WU, Satkunasingham J, Moineddin R, et al (2015) The percutaneous cecostomy tube in the management of fecal incontinence in children. J Vasc Interv Radiol 26:189–195 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Church JT, Teitelbaum DH, Jarboe MD (2015) Laparoscopic cecostomy tube placement. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 25:e180–183 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources