Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep;62(9):2757-2768.
doi: 10.1007/s11517-024-03100-4. Epub 2024 May 2.

Subject-specific trunk segmental masses prediction for musculoskeletal models using artificial neural networks

Affiliations

Subject-specific trunk segmental masses prediction for musculoskeletal models using artificial neural networks

Tao Liu et al. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2024 Sep.

Abstract

Accurate determination of body segment parameters is crucial for studying human movement and joint forces using musculoskeletal (MSK) models. However, existing methods for predicting segment mass have limited generalizability and sensitivity to body shapes. With recent advancements in machine learning, this study proposed a novel artificial neural network-based method for computing subject-specific trunk segment mass and center of mass (CoM) using only anthropometric measurements. We first developed, trained, and validated two artificial neural networks that used anthropometric measurements as input to predict body shape (ANN1) and tissue mass (ANN2). Then, we calculated trunk segmental mass for two volunteers using the predicted body shape and tissue mass. The body shape model (ANN1) was tested on 279 subjects, and maximum deviation between the predicted body shape and the original was 28 mm. The tissue mass model (ANN2) was evaluated on 223 subjects, which when compared to ground truth data, had a mean error of less than 0.51% in the head, trunk, legs, and arms. We also compared the two volunteer's trunk segment mass with experimental data and found similar trend and magnitude. Our findings suggested that the proposed method could serve as an effective and convenient tool for predicting trunk mass.

Keywords: Body segment parameters; Body shape prediction; Center of mass; Tissue mass.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Rao G, Amarantini D, Berton E, Favier D (2006) Influence of body segments’ parameters estimation models on inverse dynamics solutions during gait. J Biomech 39:1531–1536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.04.014 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Narang YS, Murthy Arelekatti VN, Winter AG (2016) The effects of the inertial properties of above-knee prostheses on optimal stiffness, damping, and engagement parameters of passive prosthetic knees. J Biomech Eng 138. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4034168
    1. Pearsall DJ, Costigan PA (1999) The effect of segment parameter error on gait analysis results. Gait Posture 9:173–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0966-6362(99)00011-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Silva MPT, Ambrósio JAC (2004) Sensitivity of the results produced by the inverse dynamic analysis of a human stride to perturbed input data. Gait Posture 19:35–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6362(03)00013-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fritz J, Kröll J, Schwameder H (2019) Influence of body segment parameter estimation on calculated ground reaction forces in highly dynamic movements. J Biomech 84:11–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.12.008 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources