Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 May 2;8(1):62.
doi: 10.1186/s41747-024-00452-2.

Artificial intelligence in interventional radiology: state of the art

Affiliations
Review

Artificial intelligence in interventional radiology: state of the art

Pierluigi Glielmo et al. Eur Radiol Exp. .

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has demonstrated great potential in a wide variety of applications in interventional radiology (IR). Support for decision-making and outcome prediction, new functions and improvements in fluoroscopy, ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging, specifically in the field of IR, have all been investigated. Furthermore, AI represents a significant boost for fusion imaging and simulated reality, robotics, touchless software interactions, and virtual biopsy. The procedural nature, heterogeneity, and lack of standardisation slow down the process of adoption of AI in IR. Research in AI is in its early stages as current literature is based on pilot or proof of concept studies. The full range of possibilities is yet to be explored.Relevance statement Exploring AI's transformative potential, this article assesses its current applications and challenges in IR, offering insights into decision support and outcome prediction, imaging enhancements, robotics, and touchless interactions, shaping the future of patient care.Key points• AI adoption in IR is more complex compared to diagnostic radiology.• Current literature about AI in IR is in its early stages.• AI has the potential to revolutionise every aspect of IR.

Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; Machine learning; Neural networks (computer); Radiology (interventional).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

LMS is a member of the Advisory Editorial Board for European Radiology Experimental (Musculoskeletal Radiology). They have not taken part in the selection or review process for this article. The remaining authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. von Ende E, Ryan S, Crain MA, Makary MS. Artificial intelligence, augmented reality, and virtual reality advances and applications in interventional radiology. Diagnostics. 2023;13:892. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13050892. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nalepa J, Marcinkiewicz M, Kawulok M. Data augmentation for brain-tumor segmentation: a review. Front Comput Neurosci. 2019;3:83. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2019.00083. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sinha I, Aluthge DP, Chen ES, Sarkar IN, Ahn SH. Machine learning offers exciting potential for predicting postprocedural outcomes: a framework for developing random forest models in IR. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020;31:1018–1024.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2019.11.030. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Morshid A, Elsayes KM, Khalaf AM, et al. A machine learning model to predict hepatocellular carcinoma response to transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. Radiol Artif Intell. 2019;1:e180021. doi: 10.1148/ryai.2019180021. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Peng J, Kang S, Ning Z, et al. Residual convolutional neural network for predicting response of transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma from CT imaging. Eur Radiol. 2020;30:413–424. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06318-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types