Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 May 1;22(1):413.
doi: 10.1186/s12967-024-05206-7.

The potential and promise for clinical application of adoptive T cell therapy in cancer

Affiliations
Review

The potential and promise for clinical application of adoptive T cell therapy in cancer

Yinqi Li et al. J Transl Med. .

Abstract

Adoptive cell therapy has revolutionized cancer treatment, especially for hematologic malignancies. T cells are the most extensively utilized cells in adoptive cell therapy. Currently, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, T cell receptor-transgenic T cells and chimeric antigen receptor T cells are the three main adoptive T cell therapies. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes kill tumors by reinfusing enlarged lymphocytes that naturally target tumor-specific antigens into the patient. T cell receptor-transgenic T cells have the ability to specifically destroy tumor cells via the precise recognition of exogenous T cell receptors with major histocompatibility complex. Chimeric antigen receptor T cells transfer genes with specific antigen recognition structural domains and T cell activation signals into T cells, allowing T cells to attack tumors without the assistance of major histocompatibility complex. Many barriers have been demonstrated to affect the clinical efficacy of adoptive T cell therapy, such as tumor heterogeneity and antigen loss, hard trafficking and infiltration, immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and T cell exhaustion. Several strategies to improve the efficacy of adoptive T cell therapy have been explored, including multispecific chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy, combination with immune checkpoint blockade, targeting the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, etc. In this review, we will summarize the current status and clinical application, followed by major bottlenecks in adoptive T cell therapy. In addition, we will discuss the promising strategies to improve adoptive T cell therapy. Adoptive T cell therapy will result in even more incredible advancements in solid tumors if the aforementioned problems can be handled.

Keywords: Adoptive cell therapy; Chimeric antigen receptor; Immunotherapy; T cell receptor; Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Process of TIL treatment. The tumor was excised by surgery and prepared into a single-cell suspension by mechanically cut and digestive enzymes. Different types of TILs proliferated on cell plates with high dose of IL-2, producing billions of TILs within three weeks. Any TILs that have anti-tumor effect were left as the positive TIL populations after culturing with the tumor cells of patients. TILs were then expanded to treatment levels by rapid expansion phase. Patients underwent lymphodepletion prior to receiving TILs, and then 10–150 billion TILs and high dose of IL-2 were administered into them. By Figdraw
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Differences between T cell receptor-transgenic T (TCR-T) cells and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells. A Transgenic TCRs were capable of forming functional TCR-CD3 complexes and did not differ from the standard TCR structure of an α/β chain heterodimer. Major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-presented intracellular peptide antigens were recognized by TCRs. The two intracellular CD3 domains triggered downstream TCR signaling upon antigen recognition. B CARs, unlike TCRs, were unable to assemble CD3 complexes, and the single-chain fragment variable (scFv) did not require MHC to recognize surface antigens. By Figdraw
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Summary of major barriers of Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) in solid tumors. Some of the most difficult barriers to the development of ACT in solid tumors included tumor heterogeneity, antigen loss, hard trafficking and infiltration, an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, and T cell exhaustion. By Figdraw

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. McNutt M. Cancer immunotherapy. Science. 2013;342(6165):1417. doi: 10.1126/science.1249481. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Robert C, Thomas L, Bondarenko I, O'Day S, Weber J, Garbe C, et al. Ipilimumab plus dacarbazine for previously untreated metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(26):2517–2526. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1104621. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen L, Han X. Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy of human cancer: past, present, and future. J Clin Invest. 2015;125(9):3384–3391. doi: 10.1172/JCI80011. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Morotti M, Albukhari A, Alsaadi A, Artibani M, Brenton JD, Curbishley SM, et al. Promises and challenges of adoptive T-cell therapies for solid tumours. Br J Cancer. 2021;124(11):1759–1776. doi: 10.1038/s41416-021-01353-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guedan S, Ruella M, June CH. Emerging cellular therapies for cancer. Annu Rev Immunol. 2019;37:145–171. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-042718-041407. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances