Engaging patient and community stakeholders in the optimization of the Compassionate And Loving Mindset towards heart health risk (CALM Hearts) physical activity intervention: a description of initial work and protocol for future engagement activities
- PMID: 38693591
- PMCID: PMC11062915
- DOI: 10.1186/s40900-024-00577-z
Engaging patient and community stakeholders in the optimization of the Compassionate And Loving Mindset towards heart health risk (CALM Hearts) physical activity intervention: a description of initial work and protocol for future engagement activities
Abstract
Background: Participatory research approaches systematically integrate the perspectives of individuals, organizations, or communities that have a direct interest in a study's processes and outcomes (i.e., stakeholders) in research design and implementation. This supports interventions that are developed "by, not for" end-users, thereby increasing acceptability, uptake, and adherence. However, participatory approaches are relatively under-utilized in intervention development and behavioral change intervention research, in part, due to inadequate reporting of methodology. Therefore, to improve transparency in planning and reporting, we (a) describe how we engaged patients and community organizations (i.e., patient and community partners) in grant development for a self-compassion and physical activity behaviour change intervention for women with cardiovascular risk factors and (b) present a protocol for engaging patient and community partners in the optimization and implementation of the intervention moving forward.
Methods: Our participatory research approach was guided by the Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research patient engagement framework and our prior stakeholder engagement work. Four patients and three community partners were engaged at the level of Involve, meaning their perspectives informed directions, processes, and decisions at major project milestones. Specifically, patient and community partners engaged in three separate meetings during grant development wherein they: (a) established a Terms of Reference to guide engagement activities and expectations; (b) shaped the grant through guided conversations about research priorities, outcomes, and intervention delivery components that could be targeted for optimization and (c) co-developed a protocol that specifies how relationships will be initiated with future patient partners, proposes engagement activities across the research cycle, and includes plans for formal evaluation of engagement processes.
Conclusions: Participatory research approaches provide valuable insights into the development of behavioural interventions, especially when stakeholders can partner early and have a meaningful impact. By detailing our engagement activities to date, we hope to model an approach to engaging stakeholders in behavioral intervention development and demonstrate the impacts of doing so.
Keywords: Behaviour change; Intervention development; Optimization; Participatory design; Patient and public involvement; Patient engagement in research; Protocol; Self-compassion; Stakeholder engagement.
Plain language summary
Background: Participatory research engages individuals, organizations, or communities affected by a study’s outcomes (“stakeholders”), in its design and conduct. Participatory research approaches are not commonly used in intervention development and behavioral intervention research, in part due to a lack of studies describing ways to engage stakeholders in this work. Therefore, our study aimed to (a) describe how we engaged patients and community organizations (“patient and community partners”) in developing a grant application for a behaviour intervention for women with cardiovascular risk factors and (b) present a protocol for engaging patient and community partners in the future intervention.
Methods: Our approach was guided by the Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research patient engagement framework and our prior engagement work. Four patient and three community partners were engaged at the level of Involve, meaning their perspectives informed directions, processes, and decisions at project milestones. Across three sets of meetings, patient and community partners: (a) established a Terms of Reference to guide engagement activities and expectations; (b) shaped the grant through guided conversations about research priorities, outcomes, and intervention design; and (c) co-developed a protocol that described how relationships will be initiated with future patient partners, potential engagement activities across the research cycle, and evaluation plans.
Conclusions: Participatory research approaches provide valuable insights into the development of behavioural interventions, especially when stakeholders can partner early and have a meaningful impact. By detailing our engagement activities, we hope to model an approach to engaging stakeholders in behavioral intervention development and demonstrate the impacts of doing so.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Evaluating the impact of engaging older adults and service providers as research partners in the co-design of a community mobility-promoting program: a mixed methods developmental evaluation study.Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Dec 8;9(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00523-5. Res Involv Engagem. 2023. PMID: 38062536 Free PMC article.
-
Activities and impacts of patient engagement in CIHR SPOR funded research: a cross-sectional survey of academic researcher and patient partner experiences.Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Aug 29;8(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00376-4. Res Involv Engagem. 2022. PMID: 36038887 Free PMC article.
-
Using qualitative Health Research methods to improve patient and public involvement and engagement in research.Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Dec 13;4:49. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0129-8. eCollection 2018. Res Involv Engagem. 2018. PMID: 30564459 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing Methods to Make Research More Patient Centered [Internet].Washington (DC): Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI); 2019 Dec. Washington (DC): Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI); 2019 Dec. PMID: 39312606 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
The Bidirectional Engagement and Equity (BEE) Research Framework to Guide Community-Academic Partnerships: Developed From a Narrative Review and Diverse Stakeholder Perspectives.Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14161. doi: 10.1111/hex.14161. Health Expect. 2024. PMID: 39087753 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Establishing Effective Patient Engagement Through a Terms of Reference to Foster Inclusivity and Empowerment in Research: Example From a Healthcare Transition Quality Indicators Project.Health Expect. 2024 Dec;27(6):e70113. doi: 10.1111/hex.70113. Health Expect. 2024. PMID: 39610083 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, Abraham C, Francis J, Hardeman W, et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013;46(1):81–95. doi: 10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Minkler M, Salvatore AL, Chang C. 175Participatory Approaches for Study Design and Analysis in Dissemination and Implementation Research. In: Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK, editors. Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice: Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 0.
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources