Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2024 May 2:30:e943630.
doi: 10.12659/MSM.943630.

Comparing Neuromuscular Blockade Measurement Between Upper Arm (TOF Cuff®) and Eyelid (TOF Scan®) Using Mivacurium during General Anesthesia

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparing Neuromuscular Blockade Measurement Between Upper Arm (TOF Cuff®) and Eyelid (TOF Scan®) Using Mivacurium during General Anesthesia

Paweł Radkowski et al. Med Sci Monit. .

Abstract

BACKGROUND Mivacurium is a non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agent. TOF-Cuff® is a device that monitors intraoperative neuromuscular blockade and blood pressure. TOF-Scan® measures muscle relaxation status of an anaesthetized patient. This study included 36 patients aged 18 to 75 years presenting for elective surgery, to compare neuromuscular blockade measured using the TOF-Cuff of the upper arm and the TOF-Scan of the facial corrugator supercilii muscle during general anesthesia and following administration of mivacurium. MATERIAL AND METHODS Train-of-four (TOF) values were obtained every 30 s before intubation and successively every 5 min until extubation. RESULTS The median onset time for TOF-Cuff was longer than for TOF-Scan (210 s vs 90 s, P<0.00001). Multiplying the time to relaxation (according to TOF-Scan) by 1 to 8, respectively, provided concordance with the TOF-Cuff result for the following cumulative percentages of patients: 5.5%, 38.9%, 58.3%, 77.8%, 83.3%, 86.1%, 88.9%, and 91.7%. Analogue values for time to recovery from the last dose were 11.1%, 63.9%, 83.3%, 86.1%, 86.1%, 88.9%, 88.9%, and 91.7%. The proportion of patients who still had TOFratio=0 in the assessment performed at min 15 did not differ significantly between these 2 methods (P=0.088). Both TOF-Scan and TOF-Cuff showed a false-negative result in patients with clinical symptoms of preterm recovery; the numerical difference favored TOF-Cuff (1.6% vs 2.1%) but without statistical significance (P=0.2235). CONCLUSIONS When measurement on the limb is not possible, TOF-Scan on the eyelid can be an alternative for TOF-Cuff on the upper arm, if the time to relaxation is multiplied by at least 8, which is enough for 90% of patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: None declared

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Placement of devices (A) TOF-Scan and (B) TOF-Cuff.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Kaplan-Meier curve presenting time to TOFratio=0 measured with both methods. (Created in: Statistica 13.3, Tibco). (B) The Bland-Altman plot (average vs difference) for onset of neuromuscular block after mivacurium 0.2 mg/kg. The solid line illustrates the mean difference and the dashed lines indicate average difference ±1.96 standard deviation of the difference. (Created in: Microsoft Excel 2019). TOF – train-of-four; TOF-Cuff – a device designed for neuromuscular monitoring on an upper arm; TOF-Scan – a device designed for neuromuscular monitoring on a facial corrugator supercilii muscle.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The Bland-Altman plot (average vs difference) for time from the last dose of mivacurium to TOFratio>90. The solid line illustrates the mean difference and the dashed lines indicate average difference ±1.96 standard deviation of the difference. TOF – train-of-four; TOF-Cuff – a device designed for neuromuscular monitoring on an upper arm; TOF-Scan – a device designed for neuromuscular monitoring on a facial corrugator supercilii muscle. (Created in: Microsoft Excel 2019).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lee W. The latest trend in neuromuscular monitoring: Return of the electromyography. Anesth Pain Med (Seoul) 2021;16(2):133–37. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Murphy GS, Szokol JW, Avram MJ, et al. Comparison of the TOFscan and the TOF-Watch SX during recovery of neuromuscular function. Anesthesiology. 2018;129(5):880–88. - PubMed
    1. Naguib M, Brull SJ, Kopman AF, et al. Consensus statement on perioperative use of neuromuscular monitoring. Anesth Analg. 2018;127(1):71–80. - PubMed
    1. Markle A, Horn K, Welter J, Dullenkopf A. An observational study comparing the performance of TOF-Cuff with TOF-Scan monitoring during anaesthetic induction in clinical routine. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2020;52(3):181–86. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hemmerling TM, Schmidt J, Hanusa C, et al. Simultaneous determination of neuromuscular block at the larynx, diaphragm, adductor pollicis, orbicularis oculi and corrugator supercilii muscles. Br J Anaesth. 2000;85(6):856–60. - PubMed

Publication types