The deep abdominal ultrasound transducer (DAX) increases the success rate and diagnostic accuracy of shear wave elastography for liver fibrosis assessment in patients with obesity-A prospective biopsy-controlled study
- PMID: 38693718
- DOI: 10.1111/apt.18019
The deep abdominal ultrasound transducer (DAX) increases the success rate and diagnostic accuracy of shear wave elastography for liver fibrosis assessment in patients with obesity-A prospective biopsy-controlled study
Abstract
Background: Obesity impacts the diagnostic accuracy of shear wave elastography (SWE). A deep abdominal ultrasound transducer (DAX) capable of point (pSWE) and two-dimensional (2D)-SWE has recently been introduced to address this issue.
Methods: We performed a prospective study in a cohort of mostly patients with obesity undergoing liver biopsy with a high prevalence of metabolic dysfunction-associate steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) was measured using vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE), as well as pSWE and 2D SWE on the standard (5C1) and the DAX transducers.
Results: We included 129 patients with paired LSM and liver biopsy: median age 44.0 years, 82 (63.6%) women, median BMI: 43.2 kg/m2. Histologic fibrosis stages: F0: N = 55 (42.6%), F1: N = 14 (10.9%), F2: N = 50 (38.8%), F3: N = 2 (1.6%), F4: N = 8 (6.2%). VCTE-LSM failed (N = 13) or were unreliable (IQR/median ≤30% in ≥7.1 kPa, N = 14) in 20.9% of patients. The Pearson correlation of reliable VCTE-LSM with both pSWE and 2D SWE was strong (all >0.78). The diagnostic accuracy for all LSM techniques was poor for significant fibrosis (≥F2, AUC: 0.54-0.63); however, it was good to excellent for advanced fibrosis (≥F3, AUC: 0.87-0.99) and cirrhosis (F4, AUC: 0.86-1.00). In intention-to-diagnose analysis, pSWE on DAX was significantly superior to VCTE-LSM.
Conclusions: pSWE- and 2D-SWE enable the non-invasive identification of advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with obese MASLD. The use of the DAX transducer for acoustic radiation force imaging (ARFI)-LSM avoids technical failures in an obese population and subsequently offers advantages over VCTE-LSM for the evaluation of fibrosis in an obese MASLD population at risk for fibrosis.
© 2024 The Authors. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Comment in
-
Editorial: ARFI-based techniques are better than VCTE for diagnosing advanced fibrosis in severe obesity.Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2024 Jul;60(2):280-281. doi: 10.1111/apt.18036. Epub 2024 May 25. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2024. PMID: 38795369 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography for Liver Disease. A Critical Appraisal of the Many Actors on the Stage.Ultraschall Med. 2016 Feb;37(1):1-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1567037. Epub 2016 Feb 12. Ultraschall Med. 2016. PMID: 26871407
-
Liver stiffness measured with two-dimensional shear wave elastography comparable to histopathology falls dominantly on the severe liver fibrosis.Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2021;79(4):587-596. doi: 10.3233/CH-211223. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2021. PMID: 34334386
-
UDFF and Auto pSWE accurately assess liver steatosis and fibrosis risk in obese patients with MASLD.Ultraschall Med. 2025 Aug 7. doi: 10.1055/a-2592-1431. Online ahead of print. Ultraschall Med. 2025. PMID: 40774298 English.
-
Comparing FIB-4, VCTE, pSWE, 2D-SWE, and MRE Thresholds and Diagnostic Accuracies for Detecting Hepatic Fibrosis in Patients with MASLD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jun 24;15(13):1598. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15131598. Diagnostics (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40647597 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Diagnostic accuracy of elastography and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with NAFLD: A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Hepatol. 2021 Oct;75(4):770-785. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.04.044. Epub 2021 May 13. J Hepatol. 2021. PMID: 33991635
Cited by
-
Rapid improvement of hepatic steatosis and liver stiffness after metabolic/bariatric surgery: a prospective study.Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 30;14(1):17558. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67415-w. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39080285 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Riazi K, Azhari H, Charette JH, Underwood FE, King JA, Afshar EE, et al. The prevalence and incidence of NAFLD worldwide: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;7(9):851–861.
-
- Loomba R, Wong R, Fraysse J, Shreay S, Li S, Harrison S, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease progression rates to cirrhosis and progression of cirrhosis to decompensation and mortality: a real world analysis of Medicare data. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020;51(11):1149–1159.
-
- Semmler G, Datz C, Reiberger T, Trauner M. Diet and exercise in NAFLD/NASH: beyond the obvious. Liver Int. 2021;41(10):2249–2268.
-
- Verrastro O, Panunzi S, Castagneto‐Gissey L, de Gaetano A, Lembo E, Capristo E, et al. Bariatric‐metabolic surgery versus lifestyle intervention plus best medical care in non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis (BRAVES): a multicentre, open‐label, randomised trial. Lancet. 2023;401(10390):1786–1797.
-
- Lange NF, Radu P, Dufour JF. Prevention of NAFLD‐associated HCC: role of lifestyle and chemoprevention. J Hepatol. 2021;75(5):1217–1227.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous