Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 18;86(5):2729-2738.
doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001944. eCollection 2024 May.

Comparative efficacy of acupuncture, venesection, and physical therapy on chronic low back pain outcomes: a randomized clinical trial

Moein Jamali Dastjerdi  1 , Mohaddeseh Azadvari  2 , Gholamreza Kordafshari  1 , Bai-Xiao Zhao  3 , Mohammad Sadegh Adel-Mehraban  1   4 , Reihane Alipour  4   5 , Mehrdad Karimi  1 , Amir Hooman Kazemi  1   6 , Arman Sourani  7 , Ali Vafaie Sefti  1
Affiliations

Comparative efficacy of acupuncture, venesection, and physical therapy on chronic low back pain outcomes: a randomized clinical trial

Moein Jamali Dastjerdi et al. Ann Med Surg (Lond). .

Abstract

Objective: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) imposes considerable financial and social burden with poor response to medical and surgical treatments. Alternatively, acupuncture and venesection(Fasd) are traditionally used to alleviate nociceptive and musculoskeletal pains. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and the safety of acupuncture and venesection on CLBP and patient functionality.

Methods: The current study was a single-blinded, randomized clinical trial with balanced allocation, conducted in the Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Medicine, in 2022. One hundred five CLBP patients who had no back pain-attributable structural or major diseases were randomly allocated into three parallel arms and received either physical therapy (PTG), acupuncture (APG), or venesection (VSG). Pain severity and functional aspects were evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) during the study. VAS and ODI scores were defined as the primary outcomes.

Results: Ninety-five patients were reviewed in the final analysis (PTG=33, APG=30, VSG=31). Demographic data showed equal group distribution. Statistical analysis showed all procedures had reduced VAS score immediately after the first session, after the last session, and after follow-up; however, APG and VSG values were significantly lower (P<0.05). Pain reduction results in follow-up period were more sustainable in APG and VSG as compared to PTG (P<0.01). ODI results revealed global improvement after the last session of the treatment in all groups, while APG had more significant results (P<0.05). During the follow-up period, ODI still tended to decrease in VSG, non-significantly increased in APG, and significantly increased in PTG. Only two patients reported fainting after receiving venesection.

Conclusion: Considering the pain and functional scores, both acupuncture and venesection can reproduce reliable results. Acupuncture and venesection both have sustained effects on pain and daily function of the patients even after treatment termination, while physical therapy had more relapse in pain and functional limitations.

Keywords: Acupuncture; chronic low back pain; oswestry disability index; physical therapy modalities; traditional chinese medicine; traditional persian medicine; venesection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.Sponsorships or competing interests that may be relevant to content are disclosed at the end of this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Steps of performing procedures.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Performance of acupuncture and venesection (informed consent has been obtained from the patient). (A) Acupuncture: (A1) acupuncture points on the back and (A2) acupuncture points on the lower limb; (B) venesection: (B1) finding the basilic vein and (B2) bloodletting.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Patients’ allocation process (CONSORT flow diagram).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Progression of outcomes: (A) visual analogue scale (VAS) score, (B) Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)%; End, after the last session of treatment; FU, after 1-month follow-up; Post, after the first session of treatment; Pre, before treatment.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Relapse of the problems: (A) visual analogue scale (VAS) score, (B) Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)%; End, after the last session of treatment; FU, after 1-month follow-up.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Suh JH, Kim H, Jung GP, et al. . The effect of lumbar stabilization and walking exercises on chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019;98:e16173. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Saper RB, Lemaster C, Delitto A, et al. . Yoga, Physical therapy, or education for chronic low back pain: a randomized noninferiority trial. Ann Intern Med 2017;167:85–94. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ohnmeiss DD, Rashbaum RF. Patient satisfaction with spinal cord stimulation for predominant complaints of chronic, intractable low back pain. Spine J 2001;1:358–363. - PubMed
    1. Godfrey E, Wileman V, Holmes MG, et al. . Physical therapy informed by acceptance and commitment therapy (PACT) versus usual care physical therapy for adults with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. J Pain 2020;21:71–81. - PubMed
    1. Sung W-S, Hong Y, Jeon S-R, et al. . Efficacy and safety of thread embedding acupuncture combined with acupuncture for chronic low back pain: a randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded, multicenter clinical trial. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020;99:e22526. - PMC - PubMed