Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale: a systematic review psychometrics properties using the COSMIN
- PMID: 38694299
- PMCID: PMC11060289
- DOI: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001968
Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale: a systematic review psychometrics properties using the COSMIN
Abstract
Background: Psychometrical evaluation of persons of diverse contexts and different populations, including general or clinical.
Objective: This review study aimed to evaluate the psychometrics quality of resilience scales.
Methods: International and Iranian databases were searched with MESH terms, including "psychometric", "validity", "reliability", "Connor-Davidson resilience scale", "Resilience scale", for published articles up to 1 February 2023. For each of the selected studies, the risk of bias was evaluated using the COSMIN Risk of Bias Checklist. Then the COSMIN checklist was used to evaluate the entire text of the article for methodological quality.
Results: Considering the inclusion criteria, 80 documents were evaluated. According to the COSMIN's criteria for evaluating the risk of bias, the current study findings revealed the included studies' limitations in assessing the three versions of CD-RISC cross-cultural and content validity as well as their stability (e.g. conducting test re-test), whereas the majority of psychometric studies of CD-RISC-25, and CD-RISC-2 rated as very good or adequate in terms of structural validity. In terms of quality assessment of the included studies, the current study indicated that investigating the structural validity of the CD-RISC was mainly done based on exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and confirmatory factor analysis was absent.
Conclusion: The general result indicates the acceptability of the quality of the studies. However, concerns for measurement properties such as responsiveness and criterion validity as well as the standard error of measurement have been neglected.
Keywords: COSMIN; Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale; psychometrics; resilience; systematic review.
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interests.Sponsorships or competing interests that may be relevant to content are disclosed at the end of this article.
References
-
- Yates TM, Masten AS. Fostering the Future: Resilience Theory and the Practice of Positive Psychology. Positive Psychology in Practice. John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2004:521–539.
-
- Yates TM, Tyrell FA, Masten AS. Resilience theory and the practice of positive psychology from individuals to societies. Posit Psychol Pract, 2nd ed. Wiley Online Library; 2015;44:773–788.
-
- Knipscheer J, Sleijpen M, Frank L, et al. . Prevalence of Potentially Traumatic Events, Other Life Events and Subsequent Reactions Indicative for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in the Netherlands: a General Population Study Based on the Trauma Screening Questionnaire. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17:1725. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Connor KM, Davidson JRT. Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depress Anxiety 2003;18:76–82. - PubMed