Effect of cervical paraesophageal lymph node metastasis versus supraclavicular lymph node metastasis on the overall survival of patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: an observational study
- PMID: 38694352
- PMCID: PMC11060193
- DOI: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001955
Effect of cervical paraesophageal lymph node metastasis versus supraclavicular lymph node metastasis on the overall survival of patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: an observational study
Abstract
Background: Esophageal cancer (EC) is a major global health burden, with a particularly high incidence in East Asia. The authors aimed to investigate the effect of metastasis in cervical paraesophageal lymph nodes (station 101) and supraclavicular lymph nodes (station 104) on the survival of patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).
Materials and methods: Data were obtained from the database of the authors' hospital. The authors retrospectively analyzed the patients with EC who underwent esophagectomy from January 2010 to December 2017. These patients were allocated into two groups based on the presence of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in the cervical paraesophageal or supraclavicular regions. Clinical outcomes and survival data were compared using the TNM staging system of the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC).
Results: After a median follow-up of 62.1 months, 122 patients with LNM in the supraclavicular region were included in the study. Among these patients, 53 showed cervical paraesophageal LNM and an overall survival (OS) of 19.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 16.3-23.5]. In contrast, 69 patients showed supraclavicular LNM with an OS of 34.9 months (95% CI 25.7-44.1). The OS rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 77%, 29%, and 21%, respectively, for patients with cervical paraesophageal LNM. Moreover, patients with supraclavicular LNM demonstrated OS rates of 88%, 48%, and 34%, respectively [Hazard ratio (HR): 0.634, 95% CI: 0.402-1.000, P=0.042].
Conclusions: Patients with ESCC with cervical paraesophageal LNM had significantly worse OS than those with supraclavicular LNM. This study underscores the importance of accurately identifying and managing ESCC with cervical paraesophageal LNM, as it may require more tailored and aggressive treatment strategies to prolong patient survival.
Keywords: cervical paraesophageal lymph node metastasis; esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; esophagectomy; lymphadenectomy; supraclavicular lymph node metastasis.
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.Sponsorships or competing interests that may be relevant to content are disclosed at the end of this article.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Cervical lymph node metastasis classified as regional nodal staging in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after radical esophagectomy and three-field lymph node dissection.BMC Surg. 2014 Dec 19;14:110. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-14-110. BMC Surg. 2014. PMID: 25527100 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of Metastatic Lymph Nodes on Survival of Patients with pN1-Category Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Long-Term Survival Analysis.Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Jun;31(6):3794-3802. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15019-z. Epub 2024 Feb 19. Ann Surg Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38372864 Free PMC article.
-
Supraclavicular lymph node metastasis should not be defined as regional lymph node metastasis in cervical and upper thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Oncol Lett. 2024 Jul 26;28(4):462. doi: 10.3892/ol.2024.14595. eCollection 2024 Oct. Oncol Lett. 2024. PMID: 39119233 Free PMC article.
-
Risk factors for lymph node metastasis in T1 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.World J Gastroenterol. 2021 Feb 28;27(8):737-750. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i8.737. World J Gastroenterol. 2021. PMID: 33716451 Free PMC article.
-
Pattern of relapse following three-field lymphadenectomy of esophageal carcinoma and related factors predictive of recurrence.Cancer Radiother. 2023 May;27(3):189-195. doi: 10.1016/j.canrad.2022.09.001. Epub 2023 Feb 6. Cancer Radiother. 2023. PMID: 36754752 Review.
Cited by
-
Optimizing lymph node dissection can better for accurate assessment and management of lymph node recurrence in postoperative thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Int J Surg. 2025 Jan 1;111(1):1-4. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001863. Int J Surg. 2025. PMID: 38896871 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Supraclavicular lymph node metastasis in esophageal carcinoma: a topic of ongoing controversy.Front Oncol. 2025 Jan 27;15:1527625. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1527625. eCollection 2025. Front Oncol. 2025. PMID: 39931082 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Optimization strategies for ultrasound zoning of cervical lymph nodes in esophageal cancer: a precision medicine approach.Front Oncol. 2025 Aug 6;15:1596770. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1596770. eCollection 2025. Front Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40842578 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. . Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71:209–249. - PubMed
-
- Bedenne L, Michel P, Bouché O, et al. . Chemoradiation followed by surgery compared with chemoradiation alone in squamous cancer of the esophagus: FFCD 9102. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:1160–1168. - PubMed
-
- Yan X, Duan H, Ni Y, et al. . Tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy for surgically resectable esophageal cancer: a prospective, single-arm, phase IIi study (TD-NICE). Int J Surg 2022;103:106680. - PubMed
-
- Vincent J, Mariette C, Pezet D, et al. . Early surgery for failure after chemoradiation in operable thoracic oesophageal cancer. Analysis of the non-randomised patients in FFCD 9102 phase III trial: chemoradiation followed by surgery versus chemoradiation alone. Eur J Cancer 2015;51:1683–1693. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources