Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 31;16(3):e57355.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.57355. eCollection 2024 Mar.

The Predictors of Perceived Barriers and Facilitators of Applying Sepsis Six Guidelines Among Critical Care Nurses

Affiliations

The Predictors of Perceived Barriers and Facilitators of Applying Sepsis Six Guidelines Among Critical Care Nurses

Dania Bani Hamad et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Background: Sepsis is a life-threatening condition that demands quick and cautious interventions from nurses, as they are the frontline caregivers, so they are essential in recognizing early signs of sepsis, initiating prompt healthcare interventions, and providing comprehensive care to improve patient outcomes. This study aimed to examine the predictors of perceived barriers and facilitators of applying evidence-based sepsis guidelines among critical care nurses.

Methods: This cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on a convenience sample of 180 nurses working in critical care settings (ICU, critical care unit, ED, burning unit, dialysis unit) at a university hospital. A valid and reliable questionnaire was used to examine the predictors of perceived barriers and facilitators of applying evidence-based sepsis guidelines among critical care nurses.

Results: This study revealed that the main barriers faced by critical care nurses are lack of sepsis recognition during observational rounds and delay in sepsis diagnosis by medical staff. For the most common facilitators of applying Sepsis Six guidelines, the participating nurses reported the presence of a written tool/protocol for sepsis identification and management.

Conclusions: The study emphasized the importance of the presence of evidence-based protocols for sepsis assessment and management and nurses' compliance with guidelines. Ongoing education training for nurses and providing step-by-step written checklists are a cornerstone to improving nurses' knowledge and the practical skills of early identification and management of sepsis.

Keywords: facilitators and barriers; nurse; perceived barriers; sepsis; sepsis six guidelines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Nurses' perceived sources of delay sources for sepsis identification.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Nurses' perceived causes of sepsis treatment delay sources.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sepsis: diagnosis and management. Gauer R, Forbes D, Boyer N. https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2020/0401/p409.html. Am Fam Physician. 2020;101:409–418. - PubMed
    1. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3) Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. JAMA. 2016;315:801–810. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Assessment of global incidence and mortality of hospital-treated sepsis. Current estimates and limitations. Fleischmann C, Scherag A, Adhikari NK, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;193:259–272. - PubMed
    1. Prevalence of sepsis among adults in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lei S, Li X, Zhao H, Xie Y, Li J. Front Public Health. 2022;10:977094. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Epidemiology, management, and outcomes of sepsis in ICUs among countries of differing national wealth across Asia. Li A, Ling L, Qin H, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022;206:1107–1116. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources