Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan-Dec:15:21501319241240347.
doi: 10.1177/21501319241240347.

Effect of Virtual Versus In Person Interpreting on Diabetes Outcomes in Non-English Language Preference Patients: A Pilot Study

Affiliations

Effect of Virtual Versus In Person Interpreting on Diabetes Outcomes in Non-English Language Preference Patients: A Pilot Study

Marvin So et al. J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this pilot study was to explore the impact of interpreter format (virtual vs in person) on clinical outcomes in patients with non-English language preference (NELP) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in a primary care setting. We hypothesized that NELP patients utilizing in person interpreters would have improved HbA1c values, better follow-up rate, and more complex care plans compared to patients utilizing virtual interpreters.

Methods: We completed a retrospective chart review of 137 NELP patients with T2DM who required a medical interpreter (February to June 2021). We calculated univariate and bivariate statistics to characterize the sample and assess the extent to which measures of continuity (follow-up visit rate and time to follow-up visit), quality (change in HbA1c), and complexity (medication intervention complexity) were associated with interpreter type.

Results: There was no statistically significant difference in follow-up rate or average days to follow-up visit for NELP patients with in person as opposed to virtual interpreters. Patients with virtual interpreters demonstrated a non-statistically significant decrease in HbA1c compared to those with in person interpreters. Finally, there was no statistically significant association between interpreter format and intervention complexity.

Conclusions: Quality medical interpretation contributes to optimal health outcomes in NELP patients with diabetes. Our study suggests that both in person and virtual interpreters can be effective in providing care for NELP patients, especially for chronic disease management in the context of a primary care relationship. It also highlights the importance of pursuing additional qualitative and mixed method studies to better understand the benefits of various interpreter formats across different visit types.

Keywords: diabetes mellitus; interpreters; non-English language preference.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Coding scale employed to classify complexity of interventions at clinic visits among a sample of limited English proficiency patients of an outpatient clinic with Type 2 Diabetes mellitus, 2021.

Similar articles

References

    1. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. By the numbers: diabetes in America. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Updated October 25, 2022. Accessed November 12, 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/health-equity/diabetes-by-the-numbers.html
    1. Montesi L, Caletti MT, Marchesini G. Diabetes in migrants and ethnic minorities in a changing world. World J Diabetes. 2016;7(3):34. doi:10.4239/wjd.v7.i3.34 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wieland ML, Morrison T, ben, Cha SS, Rahman AS, Chaudhry R. Diabetes care among somali immigrants and refugees. J Community Health. 2012;37(3):680-684. doi:10.1007/s10900-011-9499-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lanting LC, Joung IMA, Mackenbach JP, Lamberts SWJ, Bootsma AH. Ethnic differences in mortality, end-stage complications, and quality of care among diabetic patients a review. Diabetes Care 2005;28(9):2280-2288. doi:10.2337/diacare.28.9.2280. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Njeru JW, Wieland ML, Kwete G, et al.. Diabetes mellitus management among patients with limited english proficiency: a systematic review and meta-Analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2017;33(4):524-556. doi:10.1007/s11606-017-4237-1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Substances