Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2024 May 1;7(5):e249531.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.9531.

Routine Vaccination During Pregnancy Among People Living With HIV in the United States

Collaborators, Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Routine Vaccination During Pregnancy Among People Living With HIV in the United States

Saba Berhie et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Pregnancy represents a window of opportunity for vaccination due to established maternal and fetal benefits of vaccination. Little is known about receipt of routinely recommended vaccines in pregnancy, specifically tetanus, diphtheria, plus acellular pertussis (Tdap) and influenza, among pregnant people living with HIV (PLHIV).

Objective: To estimate prevalence of vaccination receipt among pregnant people with HIV (PLHIV) and identify demographic and clinical characteristics associated with vaccination.

Design, setting, and participants: This multicenter cohort study included women participating in Women's Health Study (WHS) of the Surveillance Monitoring for ART Toxicities (SMARTT) Study of the Pediatric HIV/AIDS Cohort Study. The network has been enrolling pregnant PLHIV at 22 US sites since 2007. Participants for this study enrolled between December 2017 and July 2019. Data analysis was conducted from October 2021 to March 2022.

Exposure: Data on vaccination in pregnancy were collected through medical record abstraction.

Main outcomes and measures: Vaccination receipt was defined as Tdap vaccination received at less than 36 weeks' gestation and influenza vaccination at any gestational age, based on current guidelines. Log-binomial and modified Poisson regression models with generalized estimating equations were fit to identify factors associated with successful receipt of (1) Tdap, (2) influenza, and (3) both vaccinations.

Results: A total of 310 pregnancies among 278 people participating in the WHS were included (mean [SD] age, 29.5 [6.1] years; 220 [71%] Black, 77 [25%] Hispanic, and 77 [25%] race and ethnicity other than Black; 64 [21%] with perinatally acquired HIV). Less than one-third of pregnancies were vaccinated as recommended (Tdap, 32.6% [95% CI, 27.4%-38.1%]; influenza, 31.6% [95% CI, 26.5%-37.1%]; both, 22.6% [95% CI, 18.0%-27.6%]). People living with perinatally acquired HIV, those who did not identify as Black, or those who were multiparous had adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) less than 1, while older PLHIV had aRRs greater than 1, but these differences did not reach statistical significance (perinatally acquired HIV: adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 0.46; 95% CI, 0.21-1.02; race other than Black: aRR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.26-1.08; multiparous: aRR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.35-1.00; age 24-29 years: aRR, 2.03; 95% CI, 0.92-4.48).

Conclusions and relevance: In this diverse, multicenter cohort of pregnant PLHIV, receipt of recommended vaccinations was low. Identifying and addressing barriers to vaccination receipt is urgently needed for pregnant people with HIV.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Kacanek reported receiving grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) during the conduct of the study and outside the submitted work. Dr Powis reported receiving grants from National Institute of Child Health and Human Development during the conduct of the study as well as receiving grants from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases outside the submitted work. Dr Yee reported grants from NIH during the conduct of the study and outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.. Study Population Selection
SMARTT indicates Surveillance Monitoring for ART Toxicities. aOnly pregnancies and mothers who were still in the study on December 1, 2017 (when the Women’s Health Study [WHS] opened), were included in the count. bData on hypertension (a clinical covariate of interest) were collected starting in 2015. cVaccination data were collected beginning November 14, 2018. Mothers enrolled before November 14, 2018, could still have vaccination data if there was delay between the enrollment visit and when the study staff actually abstracted the information or if the mother was co-enrolled in AMP Up and had medical record abstracted data available.

References

    1. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 732: influenza vaccination during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131(4):e109-e114. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000002588 - DOI - PubMed
    1. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 718 summary: update on immunization and pregnancy: tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis vaccination. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(3):668-669. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000002293 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lindley MC, Kahn KE, Bardenheier BH, et al. . Vital Signs: Burden and Prevention of Influenza and Pertussis Among Pregnant Women and Infants - United States. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019;68(40):885-892. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6840e1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zaman K, Roy E, Arifeen SE, et al. . Effectiveness of maternal influenza immunization in mothers and infants. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(15):1555-1564. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0708630 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Louie JK, Acosta M, Jamieson DJ, Honein MA; California Pandemic (H1N1) Working Group . Severe 2009 H1N1 influenza in pregnant and postpartum women in California. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(1):27-35. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0910444 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances