Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 2:26:e49910.
doi: 10.2196/49910.

IT-Related Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of a New European eHealth Solution, the Digital Survivorship Passport (SurPass Version 2.0): Semistructured Digital Survey

Collaborators, Affiliations

IT-Related Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of a New European eHealth Solution, the Digital Survivorship Passport (SurPass Version 2.0): Semistructured Digital Survey

Ismay A E de Beijer et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: To overcome knowledge gaps and optimize long-term follow-up (LTFU) care for childhood cancer survivors, the concept of the Survivorship Passport (SurPass) has been invented. Within the European PanCareSurPass project, the semiautomated and interoperable SurPass (version 2.0) will be optimized, implemented, and evaluated at 6 LTFU care centers representing 6 European countries and 3 distinct health system scenarios: (1) national electronic health information systems (EHISs) in Austria and Lithuania, (2) regional or local EHISs in Italy and Spain, and (3) cancer registries or hospital-based EHISs in Belgium and Germany.

Objective: We aimed to identify and describe barriers and facilitators for SurPass (version 2.0) implementation concerning semiautomation of data input, interoperability, data protection, privacy, and cybersecurity.

Methods: IT specialists from the 6 LTFU care centers participated in a semistructured digital survey focusing on IT-related barriers and facilitators to SurPass (version 2.0) implementation. We used the fit-viability model to assess the compatibility and feasibility of integrating SurPass into existing EHISs.

Results: In total, 13/20 (65%) invited IT specialists participated. The main barriers and facilitators in all 3 health system scenarios related to semiautomated data input and interoperability included unaligned EHIS infrastructure and the use of interoperability frameworks and international coding systems. The main barriers and facilitators related to data protection or privacy and cybersecurity included pseudonymization of personal health data and data retention. According to the fit-viability model, the first health system scenario provides the best fit for SurPass implementation, followed by the second and third scenarios.

Conclusions: This study provides essential insights into the information and IT-related influencing factors that need to be considered when implementing the SurPass (version 2.0) in clinical practice. We recommend the adoption of Health Level Seven Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources and data security measures such as encryption, pseudonymization, and multifactor authentication to protect personal health data where applicable. In sum, this study offers practical insights into integrating digital health solutions into existing EHISs.

Keywords: SurPass, eHealth; Survivorship Passport; cancer survivors; information and technology; long-term follow up care; pediatric oncology; survivorship.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

References

    1. Steliarova-Foucher E, Fidler MM, Colombet M, Lacour B, Kaatsch P, Piñeros M, Soerjomataram I, Bray F, Coebergh JW, Peris-Bonet R, Stiller CA. Changing geographical patterns and trends in cancer incidence in children and adolescents in Europe, 1991-2010 (automated childhood cancer information system): a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(9):1159–1169. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30423-6. http://hdl.handle.net/2318/1681592 S1470-2045(18)30423-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. The SIOPE strategic plan: a European cancer plan for children and adolescents. SIOP Europe: The European Society for Paediatric Oncology. 2015. [2024-03-29]. https://siope.eu/media/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/the-siope-strategic-pl... .
    1. van Deuren S, Penson A, van Dulmen-den Broeder E, Grootenhuis MA, van der Heiden-van der Loo M, Bronkhorst E, Blijlevens NMA, Streefkerk N, Teepen JC, Tissing WJE, van der Pal HJH, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, Versluys BAB, Bresters D, van Leeuwen FE, Ronckers CM, Kremer LCM, Knoop H, Loonen JJ. Prevalence and risk factors of cancer-related fatigue in childhood cancer survivors: a DCCSS LATER study. Cancer. 2022;128(5):1110–1121. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33993. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/34724201 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gatta G, Botta L, Rossi S, Aareleid T, Bielska-Lasota M, Clavel J, Dimitrova N, Jakab Z, Kaatsch P, Lacour B, Mallone S, Marcos-Gragera R, Minicozzi P, Sánchez-Pérez MJ, Sant M, Santaquilani M, Stiller C, Tavilla A, Trama A, Visser O, Peris-Bonet R. Childhood cancer survival in Europe 1999-2007: results of EUROCARE-5—a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(1):35–47. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70548-5.S1470-2045(13)70548-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Robison LL, Hudson MM. Survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer: life-long risks and responsibilities. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14(1):61–70. doi: 10.1038/nrc3634. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/24304873 nrc3634 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types