IT-Related Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of a New European eHealth Solution, the Digital Survivorship Passport (SurPass Version 2.0): Semistructured Digital Survey
- PMID: 38696248
- PMCID: PMC11099813
- DOI: 10.2196/49910
IT-Related Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of a New European eHealth Solution, the Digital Survivorship Passport (SurPass Version 2.0): Semistructured Digital Survey
Abstract
Background: To overcome knowledge gaps and optimize long-term follow-up (LTFU) care for childhood cancer survivors, the concept of the Survivorship Passport (SurPass) has been invented. Within the European PanCareSurPass project, the semiautomated and interoperable SurPass (version 2.0) will be optimized, implemented, and evaluated at 6 LTFU care centers representing 6 European countries and 3 distinct health system scenarios: (1) national electronic health information systems (EHISs) in Austria and Lithuania, (2) regional or local EHISs in Italy and Spain, and (3) cancer registries or hospital-based EHISs in Belgium and Germany.
Objective: We aimed to identify and describe barriers and facilitators for SurPass (version 2.0) implementation concerning semiautomation of data input, interoperability, data protection, privacy, and cybersecurity.
Methods: IT specialists from the 6 LTFU care centers participated in a semistructured digital survey focusing on IT-related barriers and facilitators to SurPass (version 2.0) implementation. We used the fit-viability model to assess the compatibility and feasibility of integrating SurPass into existing EHISs.
Results: In total, 13/20 (65%) invited IT specialists participated. The main barriers and facilitators in all 3 health system scenarios related to semiautomated data input and interoperability included unaligned EHIS infrastructure and the use of interoperability frameworks and international coding systems. The main barriers and facilitators related to data protection or privacy and cybersecurity included pseudonymization of personal health data and data retention. According to the fit-viability model, the first health system scenario provides the best fit for SurPass implementation, followed by the second and third scenarios.
Conclusions: This study provides essential insights into the information and IT-related influencing factors that need to be considered when implementing the SurPass (version 2.0) in clinical practice. We recommend the adoption of Health Level Seven Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources and data security measures such as encryption, pseudonymization, and multifactor authentication to protect personal health data where applicable. In sum, this study offers practical insights into integrating digital health solutions into existing EHISs.
Keywords: SurPass, eHealth; Survivorship Passport; cancer survivors; information and technology; long-term follow up care; pediatric oncology; survivorship.
©Ismay A E de Beijer, Selina R van den Oever, Eliana Charalambous, Giorgio Cangioli, Julia Balaguer, Edit Bardi, Marie Alfes, Adela Cañete Nieto, Marisa Correcher, Tiago Pinto da Costa, Alexander Degelsegger-Márquez, Vanessa Düster, Anna-Liesa Filbert, Desiree Grabow, Gerald Gredinger, Hannah Gsell, Riccardo Haupt, Maria van Helvoirt, Ruth Ladenstein, Thorsten Langer, Anja Laschkolnig, Monica Muraca, Saskia M F Pluijm, Jelena Rascon, Günter Schreier, Zuzana Tomášikova, Florian Trauner, Justas Trinkūnas, Kathrin Trunner, Anne Uyttebroeck, Leontien C M Kremer, Helena J H van der Pal, Catherine Chronaki, PanCareSurPass Consortium. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 02.05.2024.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
References
-
- Steliarova-Foucher E, Fidler MM, Colombet M, Lacour B, Kaatsch P, Piñeros M, Soerjomataram I, Bray F, Coebergh JW, Peris-Bonet R, Stiller CA. Changing geographical patterns and trends in cancer incidence in children and adolescents in Europe, 1991-2010 (automated childhood cancer information system): a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(9):1159–1169. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30423-6. http://hdl.handle.net/2318/1681592 S1470-2045(18)30423-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- The SIOPE strategic plan: a European cancer plan for children and adolescents. SIOP Europe: The European Society for Paediatric Oncology. 2015. [2024-03-29]. https://siope.eu/media/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/the-siope-strategic-pl... .
-
- van Deuren S, Penson A, van Dulmen-den Broeder E, Grootenhuis MA, van der Heiden-van der Loo M, Bronkhorst E, Blijlevens NMA, Streefkerk N, Teepen JC, Tissing WJE, van der Pal HJH, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, Versluys BAB, Bresters D, van Leeuwen FE, Ronckers CM, Kremer LCM, Knoop H, Loonen JJ. Prevalence and risk factors of cancer-related fatigue in childhood cancer survivors: a DCCSS LATER study. Cancer. 2022;128(5):1110–1121. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33993. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/34724201 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Gatta G, Botta L, Rossi S, Aareleid T, Bielska-Lasota M, Clavel J, Dimitrova N, Jakab Z, Kaatsch P, Lacour B, Mallone S, Marcos-Gragera R, Minicozzi P, Sánchez-Pérez MJ, Sant M, Santaquilani M, Stiller C, Tavilla A, Trama A, Visser O, Peris-Bonet R. Childhood cancer survival in Europe 1999-2007: results of EUROCARE-5—a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(1):35–47. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70548-5.S1470-2045(13)70548-5 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Robison LL, Hudson MM. Survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer: life-long risks and responsibilities. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14(1):61–70. doi: 10.1038/nrc3634. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/24304873 nrc3634 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
