Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 8;45(7):841-849.
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8181.

Perspectives from the Inaugural "Spinal CSF Leak: Bridging the Gap" Conference: A Convergence of Clinical and Patient Expertise

Affiliations

Perspectives from the Inaugural "Spinal CSF Leak: Bridging the Gap" Conference: A Convergence of Clinical and Patient Expertise

Andrew L Callen et al. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. .

Abstract

Background and purpose: The inaugural "Spinal CSF Leak: Bridging the Gap" Conference was organized to address the complexities of diagnosing and treating spinal CSF leaks. This event aimed to converge the perspectives of clinicians, researchers, and patients with a patient-centered focus to explore the intricacies of spinal CSF leaks across 3 main domains: diagnosis, treatment, and aftercare.

Materials and methods: Physician and patient speakers were invited to discuss the varied clinical presentations and diagnostic challenges of spinal CSF leaks, which often lead to misdiagnosis or delayed treatment. Patient narratives were interwoven with discussions on advanced radiologic techniques and clinical assessments. Treatment-focused sessions highlighted patient experiences with various therapeutic options, including epidural blood patches, surgical interventions, and percutaneous and endovascular therapies. The intricacies of immediate and long-term postprocedural management were explored.

Results: Key outcomes from the conference included the recognition of the need for increased access to specialized CSF leak care for patients and heightened awareness among health care providers, especially for atypical symptoms and presentations. Discussions underscored the variability in individual treatment responses and the necessity for personalized diagnostic and treatment algorithms. Postprocedural challenges such as managing incomplete symptom relief and rebound intracranial hypertension were also addressed, emphasizing the need for effective patient monitoring and follow-up care infrastructures.

Conclusions: The conference highlighted the need for adaptable diagnostic protocols, collaborative multidisciplinary care, and enhanced patient support. These elements are vital for improving the recognition, diagnosis, and management of spinal CSF leaks, thereby optimizing patient outcomes and quality of life. The event established a foundation for future advancements in spinal CSF leak management, advocating for a patient-centered model that harmonizes procedural expertise with an in-depth understanding of patient experiences.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
Normalization of MR imaging findings across time despite persistent spinal CSF leaks. A, Sagittal T1 noncontrast MR imaging in 2018 demonstrates sagging of posterior fossa structures (bracket), engorgement of the pituitary gland, and narrowed suprasellar distance (arrow). B, Axial FLAIR MR imaging in 2018 demonstrates a diffuse, thin subdural collection (arrows). Sagittal (C) and axial (D) T2 MR imaging of the cervical spine in 2018 shows a cervicothoracic ventral epidural fluid collection (arrows). The patient underwent a dorsal nontargeted epidural blood patch in 2018 with partial relief of symptoms. E, Sagittal T1 noncontrast MR imaging in 2023 demonstrates resolution of brain sag, pituitary engorgement, and narrowing of the suprasellar interval. F, Axial FLAIR MR imaging in 2023 with resolution of the subdural collection. Sagittal (G) and axial (H) T2 MR imaging of the cervical spine in 2023 shows persistence of the cervicothoracic ventral epidural fluid collection. I. Intraoperative photograph later in 2023, with a ventral dural defect identified at T2–T3 (arrows). After repair, the patient had substantial symptom improvement, with the Headache Impact Test score improving from 68 to 48 (Headache Impact Test: range, 36–78).
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
Brain MR imaging findings incorrectly reported as normal in a patient with spontaneous intracranial hypotension. A, Sagittal T1 postcontrast MR imaging demonstrates mild narrowing of the suprasellar (1 mm, dotted arrow), mamillopontine (4.8 mm, dashed arrow), and prepontine (3 mm, solid arrow) distances. B, No pachymeningeal thickening or subdural collection on axial T1 postcontrast MR imaging. C, Left-lateral decubitus dynamic CTM detected a CVF arising from the left T7–8 neural foramen (arrow).
FIG 3.
FIG 3.
The Bern score. A, Sagittal T1 noncontrast MR imaging demonstrating the suprasellar interval (solid line, normal, >4 mm), mamillopontine interval (dotted line, normal, >6.5 mm), and prepontine interval (dashed line, normal, >5 mm). B, Sagittal T1 postcontrast MR imaging illustrates a normal flat appearance of the upward margin of the transverse sinus (arrow). C, Coronal FLAIR MR imaging with bilateral subdural fluid collections (arrows). D, Sagittal T1 postcontrast image demonstrates abnormal venous engorgement evidenced by an abnormal convex upward margin (solid arrow), as well as diffuse pachymeningeal enhancement (dotted arrows). The presence of a narrowed suprasellar interval, venous engorgement, or pachymeningeal enhancement are ascribed 2 points each, while a narrowed mamillopontine interval, prepontine interval, or the presence of subdural collections are ascribed 1 point each. A combined score of ≤2 equates to low probability, a score of 3 or 4 equates to moderate probability, and a score of ≥5 equates to high probability of localizing a CSF leak or venous fistula on subsequent myelography.
FIG 4.
FIG 4.
A 35-year-old man with spontaneous intracranial hypotension who underwent 2 prior nontargeted dorsal epidural blood patches. Sagittal (A) and axial (B) T2-weighted MR imaging sequences demonstrate a ventral epidural fluid collection (arrows). C, Prone dynamic CTM detected contrast extravasating from the subarachnoid into the ventral epidural space at T1-2, consistent with a ventral dural defect (arrow). D, Procedural image from a CT-guided epidural blood and fibrin patch using a 15-cm 22-ga spinal needle via a far-lateral transforaminal approach to target the ventral epidural space adjacent to the defect (arrow). Postinjection sagittal (E) and axial (F) images demonstrate spread of injected blood and fibrin glue along the ventral epidural space (arrows). Posttreatment sagittal T2 (G) and axial 3D T2 fat-saturated MR imaging (H) with resolution of the epidural fluid collection.
FIG 5.
FIG 5.
A 49-year-old man with a history of spontaneous intracranial hypotension, with persistent symptoms after 3 epidural blood patches. A, Axial SWI with hypointense signal along the cerebellar folia (arrows), consistent with superficial siderosis, a rare complication of chronic CSF leak. B, Axial T2-weighted MR imaging demonstrates a ventral epidural fluid collection (arrows). C, Axial noncontrast CT image shows a small osteophyte (arrows) along the ventral canal at T6–7. D, Prone dynamic CTM demonstrates extravasation of contrast from the subarachnoid space into the ventral epidural space at T6–7 (arrows), consistent with a ventral dural defect. E, Intraoperative photograph during repair of the ventral dural defect (arrows) at T6–7, accessed via hemilaminectomy, posterior durotomy, and lateral mobilization of the cord after dentate ligament resection .

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Spinal CSF Leaks: The Neuroradiologist Transforming Care.
    Mamlouk MD, Callen AL, Madhavan AA, Lützen N, Carlton Jones L, Mark IT, Brinjikji W, Benson JC, Verdoorn JT, Kim DK, Amrhein TJ, Gray L, Dillon WP, Maya MM, Huynh TJ, Shah VN, Dobrocky T, Piechowiak EI, Chazen JL, Malinzak MD, Houk JL, Kranz PG. Mamlouk MD, et al. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2024 Nov 7;45(11):1613-1620. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8484. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2024. PMID: 39209484

References

    1. Schievink WI, Maya MM, Moser F, et al. Frequency of spontaneous intracranial hypotension in the emergency department. J Headache Pain 2007;8:325–28 10.1007/s10194-007-0421-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schievink WI. Misdiagnosis of spontaneous intracranial hypotension. Arch Neurol 2003;60:1713–18 10.1001/archneur.60.12.1713 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schievink WI, Maya M, Prasad RS, et al. Spinal CSF-venous fistulas in morbidly and super obese patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021;42:397–401 10.3174/ajnr.A6895 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liaw V, McCreary M, Friedman DI. Quality of life in patients with confirmed and suspected spinal CSF leaks. Neurology 2023;101:e2411–22 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207763 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amrhein TJ, McFatrich M, Ehle K, et al. Patient experience of spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH): qualitative interviews for concept elicitation. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2023;7:82 10.1186/s41687-023-00625-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources