Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 2;11(1):436.
doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-03266-4.

PSFHS: Intrapartum ultrasound image dataset for AI-based segmentation of pubic symphysis and fetal head

Affiliations

PSFHS: Intrapartum ultrasound image dataset for AI-based segmentation of pubic symphysis and fetal head

Gaowen Chen et al. Sci Data. .

Abstract

During the process of labor, the intrapartum transperineal ultrasound examination serves as a valuable tool, allowing direct observation of the relative positional relationship between the pubic symphysis and fetal head (PSFH). Accurate assessment of fetal head descent and the prediction of the most suitable mode of delivery heavily rely on this relationship. However, achieving an objective and quantitative interpretation of the ultrasound images necessitates precise PSFH segmentation (PSFHS), a task that is both time-consuming and demanding. Integrating the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in the field of medical ultrasound image segmentation, the development and evaluation of AI-based models rely significantly on access to comprehensive and meticulously annotated datasets. Unfortunately, publicly accessible datasets tailored for PSFHS are notably scarce. Bridging this critical gap, we introduce a PSFHS dataset comprising 1358 images, meticulously annotated at the pixel level. The annotation process adhered to standardized protocols and involved collaboration among medical experts. Remarkably, this dataset stands as the most expansive and comprehensive resource for PSFHS to date.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Workflow of the establishment of the proposed dataset. (a) 1358 images from 1124 pregnant women were collected. (b) The annotation team was made up of 2 physicians and 18 annotators. (c) For each ultrasound image, two annotators conducted initial annotation. These segmentations were merged and then adjusted by a physician to obtain the ground truth. (d) Based on the final ground truth of PSFH, AOP measurement consisted of ellipse fitting, line identification, and AOP calculation.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sandall J, et al. Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children. Lancet (London, England) 2018;392:1349–1357. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31930-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Seval MM, et al. Comparison of effects of digital vaginal examination with transperineal ultrasound during labor on pain and anxiety levels: a randomized controlled trial. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2016;48:695–700. doi: 10.1002/uog.15994. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ghi T, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: intrapartum ultrasound. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2018;52:128–139. doi: 10.1002/uog.19072. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ramirez Zegarra R, Ghi T. Use of artificial intelligence and deep learning in fetal ultrasound imaging. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2023;62:185–194. doi: 10.1002/uog.26130. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fiorentino MC, Villani FP, Di Cosmo M, Frontoni E, Moccia S. A review on deep-learning algorithms for fetal ultrasound-image analysis. Medical image analysis. 2023;83:102629. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2022.102629. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types