Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2024 May 2;24(1):466.
doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09358-1.

Prediction of hospital-acquired influenza using machine learning algorithms: a comparative study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Prediction of hospital-acquired influenza using machine learning algorithms: a comparative study

Younghee Cho et al. BMC Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Hospital-acquired influenza (HAI) is under-recognized despite its high morbidity and poor health outcomes. The early detection of HAI is crucial for curbing its transmission in hospital settings.

Aim: This study aimed to investigate factors related to HAI, develop predictive models, and subsequently compare them to identify the best performing machine learning algorithm for predicting the occurrence of HAI.

Methods: This retrospective observational study was conducted in 2022 and included 111 HAI and 73,748 non-HAI patients from the 2011-2012 and 2019-2020 influenza seasons. General characteristics, comorbidities, vital signs, laboratory and chest X-ray results, and room information within the electronic medical record were analysed. Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) techniques were used to construct the predictive models. Employing randomized allocation, 80% of the dataset constituted the training set, and the remaining 20% comprised the test set. The performance of the developed models was assessed using metrics such as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), the count of false negatives (FN), and the determination of feature importance.

Results: Patients with HAI demonstrated notable differences in general characteristics, comorbidities, vital signs, laboratory findings, chest X-ray result, and room status compared to non-HAI patients. Among the developed models, the RF model demonstrated the best performance taking into account both the AUC (83.3%) and the occurrence of FN (four). The most influential factors for prediction were staying in double rooms, followed by vital signs and laboratory results.

Conclusion: This study revealed the characteristics of patients with HAI and emphasized the role of ventilation in reducing influenza incidence. These findings can aid hospitals in devising infection prevention strategies, and the application of machine learning-based predictive models especially RF can enable early intervention to mitigate the spread of influenza in healthcare settings.

Keywords: Cross infection; Influenza, Human; Logistic models; Machine learning; Patient’s rooms; Random forest.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study sample selection. HAI Hospital-acquired influenza, PCR Polymerase chain reaction, BMI Body mass index
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
ROC curves and AUCs. LR Logistic Regression, RF Random Forest, XGB Extreme Gradient Boosting, ANN Artificial Neural Network
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Results of the analysis on feature importance using RF. DNI Delta neutrophil index, BT Body temperature, AST Aspartate transaminase, DBP Diastolic blood pressure, Hb Haemoglobin, SBP Systolic blood pressure, HR Heart rate, RR Respiration rate, RDW Red blood cell distribution width, PLR Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, Cl Chloride

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Huzly D, Kurz S, Ebner W, Dettenkofer M, Panning M. Characterisation of nosocomial and community-acquired influenza in a large university hospital during two consecutive influenza seasons. J Clin Virol. 2015;73:47–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2015.10.016. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Godoy P, Torner N, Soldevila N, Rius C, Jane M, Martinez A, Cayla JA, Dominguez A. Working Group on the surveillance of severe influenza hospitalized cases in C: hospital-acquired influenza infections detected by a surveillance system over six seasons, from 2010/2011 to 2015/2016. BMC Infect Dis. 2020;20(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-4792-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alvarez-Lerma F, Marin-Corral J, Vila C, Masclans JR, Loeches IM, Barbadillo S, Gonzalez de Molina FJ, Rodriguez A, Group HNGSS. Characteristics of patients with hospital-acquired influenza A (H1N1)pdm09 virus admitted to the intensive care unit. J Hosp Infect. 2017;95(2):200–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2016.12.017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Macesic N, Kotsimbos TC, Kelly P, Cheng AC. Hospital-acquired influenza in an Australian sentinel surveillance system. Med J Aust. 2013;198(7):370–2. doi: 10.5694/mja12.11687. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Maltezou HC. Nosocomial influenza: new concepts and practice. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2008;21(4):337–43. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e3283013945. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types